M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 25

Today’s Bible readings are from Exodus 36, John 15, Proverbs 12 and Ephesians 5.

For the construction of the tabernacle there was a cadre of skilled workmen (Exodus 36:1-2) and plenty of resources (36:3-7).  In fact, the people had such generous willingness to give that there was “more than enough” (v. 5) and Moses asked them to stop giving (vv. 6-7), every building manager’s dream!

This follows the pattern of God’s giving to us.  God gives us much more than we ever need, and our giving is simply a response to His. (David Guzik)

They then built the curtains (vv. 8-19), boards and bars (vv. 20-34) and veil and screen (vv. 35-38)–all the boundaries–from the materials provided by the people.

Dutch theologian Herman Witsius (1636 – 1708) notes that it took God six days to create the universe and it took the craftsmen of Israel six days to build the tabernacle.

In John 15 Jesus speaks of the intimate relationship we can have with God through the image of the vineyard.  In this image, the Father is the vinedresser, Jesus is the vine and we are the branches.  Abiding in Jesus, like a branch is connected to the vine–drawing life from it–is the way that we bear fruit.

The expectation is that we would bear fruit, even “more fruit” (v.2) and “much fruit” (v. 8).  We cannot bear fruit unless we stay attached to Jesus.

When branches (believers) don’t bear fruit they are “taken away.”   Is this parallel to v. 6 where they are “thrown away” and “thrown into the fire,” or something different.

James Montgomery Boice (among others) believes that the ancient Greek verb airo, translated, takes away is more accurately translated lifts up.  The idea is that the Father lifts up unproductive vines off of the ground (as was common in the ancient practices of vineyard care).  Those caring for ancient grape vines made sure to lift them up off the ground that they might get more sun and bear fruit better.

A branch lifted up

Also, according to Derrickson, “the viticulture process that Jesus described in verse 6 took place in the fall, whereas the process He mentioned in verse 2 happened in the spring” (Viticulture and John 15:1-6, Bibliotheca Sacra 153:609 (January-March 1996, p. 50-51).

But what about verse 6?  Is it referring to unfruitful believers or unbelievers being cast into hell, or does it refer to unfruitful believers who are now considered useless (not pressing the fire image too far)?

The image is dropped in vv. 12-17, but Jesus continues in the theme of a close relationship with him (as “friend”).  Here the emphasis is on loving one another, the prime fruit of an abiding disciple.

Jesus then talks about their relationship with the world (vv. 18-27), that the world will hate them, but the Spirit will be with them.  They shouldn’t expect anything but persecution from the world, because it hated (hates) Jesus as well.

Proverbs 12 speaks of the value of righteousness (12:1-12) and avoiding trouble (12:13-28).

In Proverbs, one who is right (or wise) in his own eyes sees no need to seek instruction or counsel from others and is thus also unwilling to listen to reproof.  Proverbs strongly warns against this (see 3:5-7), because no one is immune to self-deception (see 16:2; 21:2), which can lead to the nearly hopeless state of having a hard heart (see 26:12). (ESV Study Bible)

“Anxiety in a man’s heart weighs him down, but a good word makes him glad.” (12:25)

What good word can you speak into an anxious person’s life today?

Ephesians 5 continues the theme of progressive sanctification.  We are to “walk in love” (5:1-2) and “walk in the light” (5:3-20).  This will then affect all our relationships, beginning with marriage (5:21-33).

“All God’s gifts, including sex, are subjects for thanksgiving, rather than for joking.  To joke about them is bound to degrade them; to thank God for them is the way to preserve their worth as the blessings of a loving Creator.” (John Stott, Ephesians, p. 193)

Because we are light (new nature), we should walk in the light.  Part of that is continually discerning God’s will (5:10), making the most of every opportunity (5:16) and being filled with the Spirit (5:18).

“Be filled with the Spirit” (5:18) is a present, passive command.  This means that it is not optional, that it must be continuous (present tense) and that it happens to us.  A more precise translation is “be being kept filled with the Spirit.”

How are we filled with the Spirit?  There are no instructions here but we would assume that we must first confess our sins, then offer our bodies as living sacrifices, then ask the Spirit to take control of us.

Having explained the basic admonition to be filled with the Spirit (vv. 15-21), Paul next applied the implication of this exhortation to various groups of Christians.

He addressed six groups: wives and husbands (5:22-33), children and parents (6:1-4), and slaves and masters (6:5-9). In each of the three pairings, the first partner is responsible to be submissive or obedient (5:22; 6:1, 5).  However, the second partner is also to show a submissive spirit.  All are to relate to one another “as unto the Lord” (5:21).

The command to wives is to submit to their husbands, which I believe is the joyful disposition to support and respond to her husband’s leadership.

The command to husbands is to sacrifice themselves for their wives.  Husbands must take the responsibility to lead their wives, which is neither tyranny nor milquetoast.  If he loves her, he will lead her for her good.

This reflects the relationship between Christ and the church.  The church submits to Christ, Christ gave up His life for His bride.

Jesus also exhibits both submission (the way we show love to those above us in the hierarchy of life) and sacrifice (the way to show love to those equal to or below you in the hierarchy of life).  He submitted to His Father in the garden and died on the cross for us.

M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 24

Today’s Bible readings are from Exodus 35, John 14, Proverbs 11 and Ephesians 4.

Exodus 35-40 is the actual building of the tabernacle.  The plans had been given (25-31) so now they take up an offering to build it and the money pours in (35:1-29).  Moses prefaces his appeal for the materials to build the tabernacle with “Whoever is of a generous heart…” (v. 5).  They were willing to give, they gave what they could and gave it to the LORD.  Everything that was needed was provided because of willing, generous hearts.

Moses again recognized “Bezalel” and “Oholiab” as unusually skillful artisans, whom God had gifted and appointed to lead the construction work (35:30—36:2).

In John 14 Jesus seeks to comfort them at the news of His departure.  First, he tells them they will not be separated forever, that He is going to His Father’s house to prepare a place for them (just like what happened in the engagement period between Jewish groom and bride) and would return to take them there (vv. 1-4).

Then, he promises them the Holy Spirit (vv. 16-17), to be their comforter.  Jesus had been their comforter, now they would have someone just like Him but with two distinct differences: (1) he would never leave them and (2) he would live in them.  What a blessing, to never be without the Comforter!

Third, he promises them that like Him, though they might die, they would live (v. 19).  Death wasn’t the end, but a new beginning.  They would see Him risen from the dead and that should comfort them that they will rise from the dead.

Dwight L. Moody once told his friends

“Some day you will read in the papers, ‘D. L. Moody of East Northfield is dead.’  Don’t you believe a word of it!  At that moment I shall be more alive than I am now…”

And C. S. Lewis said of the children who had been the main characters in the Chronicles of Narnia series, that they had now grown to adulthood and died in a train accident:

“All their life in this world and all their adventures had only been the cover and the title page: now at last they were beginning Chapter One of the Great Story which no one on earth has read: which goes on for ever: in which every chapter is better than the one before.”

Finally, Jesus promises His disciples peace.  They would really need peace because Jesus would warn them that persecution was heading their way.  It would be God’s peace, not the world’s peace that was offered to them.  The world’s peace is shallow and short-lived.

I cannot imagine God pacing back and forth, wringing his hands, saying, “What now?  What am I going to do?”  He is always calm precisely because He is God and has everything, and I mean everything, under control.

It is that peace He gives us and we can experience it when we trust that God is with us and that He is working all things out for our good.

See Jack Dawson’s Peace in the Midst of the Storm for a visual demonstration of this kind of peace.  There is a video that explains some of the hidden imagery.

And Ron Hutchcraft tells this story (I don’t know if it is true)

Years ago a major art gallery sponsored a competition for painters.  They were offering prizes for the best painting on the subject of “Peace.”  As attenders browsed through the entries, most had decided that a one certain painting was almost sure to win.  It portrayed this lush green pasture under a vivid blue sky, with the cows grazing lazily and a little boy walking through the grass with his fishing pole over his shoulder.  It really made you feel peaceful.

But it came in second.  The painting that won was a real surprise.  The scene was the ocean in a violent storm.  The sky was ominous, the lightning was cutting across the sky, and the waves were crashing into the rock walls of the cliffs by the shore.  No peace.  But you had to look twice to understand what was going on.  There, about halfway up the cliff, was a birds’ nest, tucked into a tiny hollow in the rock.  A mother bird was sitting on that nest – with her little babies, tucked underneath her, sleeping soundly.  That was peace!

Anybody can have “peace” when the conditions are perfect, but we need the kind of peace that can weather the storms…and that is the peace that God gives.

Proverbs 11:1-8 focuses on matters of financial and personal security.  The riches of the wicked that will not save them (v. 4) and the false balance whereby a wicked man increases his income (v. 1) are contrasted with the just weight (v. 1) and righteousness (v. 4). Similarly, the pride (v. 2) and crookedness (v. 3) that lead people to ruin are contrasted with the humble attitude (v. 2) and integrity (v. 3) that guides people through the troubles of life.

11:5-6 parallel each other (The righteousness of the blameless/upright) and emphasize a common theme of the section: the faithfulness of the righteous guides (vv. 3a, 5a) and delivers them (see vv. 4a, 6a, 8a, 9b) from the fate of the wicked.

Wise investments are also the dominant theme of 11:16-31.  In 11:18 the wicked sows wickedness and reaps what he does not expect (“deceptive wages,” cf. Rom. 6:23): divine punishment rather than blessing.  The righteous, on the other hand, “sows righteousness” and reaps what he sows: blessing (cf. Gal. 6:7).  The former reward is often deceptive and disappointing, but the latter is truly satisfying.  Haman reaped a bitter harvest for his wicked sowing, whereas Jesus received nothing but glory for His sowing.

11:24-26 speaks of giving which is not loss, but gain.

If God rewards the righteous with blessings in this life (11:31, and He does, “how much more” will He repay wicked sinners before they die!  No one sins with impunity.  We reap what we sow.  God will judge every sin.

While ungodly people may appear to prosper and live carefree lives, they do not experience the blessing of fellowship with God, which is the greatest blessing human beings can enjoy in this life (cf. Phil. 3:7-11).  Job is an example of a righteous man who experienced great reward before he died, as did Abraham, David, Paul, and a host of others.  Several of the wicked kings of Israel and Judah illustrate the alternative.  Peter quoted this proverb (1 Pet. 4:18).

Ephesians 4 begins the practical portion of this epistle.  In chapters 1-3 Paul described what God has done for us and we might say that our position is in view and that we are seated in the heavenlies.  The dominant theme of Ephesians 4-5 is our walk, our practice, while Ephesians 6:10-20 calls us to stand.  The “therefore” at the beginning of 4:1 shows that our practice is based on our position, our character on our calling, imperatives are built on indicatives.

Ephesians 4:1-16 is organized in a large parallel known as a chiasm. The first part of this parallel (verses 1-6) deals with the unity of the church. The second part of this parallel (verses 7-16) deals with the diversity of the church.

Practical Unity (4:1-3)

Practical Diversity (4:12-16)
 
Doctrinal Unity (4:5-6) ————

Doctrinal Diversity (4:7-11)

Because the Trinity is united and everything God has done for us unites us, we are to be united.  The attitudes of humility, gentleness, patience and forbearance in love is our part.

But that unity is not uniformity.  We are all given different gifts and those gifts enable us to build up the body.  Spiritual leaders are given (v. 11) to equip the saints for ministry, not to do all the work themselves.

The goal is maturity and unity (diversity is not divisiveness) so that we are not carried away by every “wind of doctrine.”

So we are called to walk according to our calling–in unity and diversity, but we are also called to walk differently than the Gentiles (unsaved).  Having “learned Christ” (4:20) we are to (1) put off the old self, (2) be renewed in our minds, and (3) put on the new self.  This threefold pattern is carried through chapter 4 into chapter 5.

The Old Self

The New Self

Your former manner of life The new life in Christ
On its way to destruction Created anew
Rotting under the power of lust Increasing under the power of God
Controlled by lust Controlled by truth

Some have called Ephesians 4:25-32 Four Rules for Fighting Fair:

  1. Speak the truth to one another (v. 25)
  2. Reconcile quickly (vv. 26-27)
  3. Use edifying language (v. 29)
  4. Be willing to forgive (vv. 30-32)

In each case Paul tells them what to put off and what to put on, and usually gives a reason (renewing of the mind, understanding why).

For example, in Ephesians 4:25 Paul tells them to put away speaking falsehood (lying, deception) and put on telling the truth and then tells them “for we are members of one another.”  Since we are members of one another, lying rips the fabric of that relationship.

See if you can pick out each of the three steps in the remaining verses.

 

M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 23

Today’s readings are from Exodus 34, John 13, Proverbs 10 and Ephesians 3.

Exodus 34:6 is the first of many (Num. 14:18; Psa. 86:15; 103:8; 145:8; Joel 2:13) brief revelations of God’s character, what we might call the “softer side” of God.  The Lord “passed before him” as in 33:19, 22.  We don’t know what he saw, but he heard these wonderful words: “”The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness” (Exodus 34:6).

This revelation of the character of God to Moses forever puts away the idea that there is a bad God of the Old Testament which is in contrast to the good God of the New Testament.  God’s character of love and mercy and grace is present in the Old Testament as well as in the New Testament. (David Guzik)

Moses’ immediate response was to bow low and worship (v. 8) and again appealed for God’s presence to go with them (v. 9).  So Yahweh renewed the covenant with Israel, promising to bring them victoriously into the land but commanding them neither to make covenants with the Canaanites nor worship their gods.  They were to keep the festivals (v. 18, 22-24) and sabbath (v. 21), dedicate the firstborn animal (vv. 19-20) and firstfruits (v. 26) to Yahweh.

Moses spent 40 days and nights (fasting!) with Yahweh (v. 28), and when he came down, his face was shining with God’s glory (v. 29).  Moses relayed God’s commands, then put a veil over his face (cf. 2 Cor. 3:7-18).

The blessing of God’s people rests on the faithful lovingkindness of God and the intercession of their leaders: Jesus Christ and human leaders. We cannot stress too much the importance of the kind of intercession that Moses modeled on this occasion. If God has given you a ministry of leadership, your intercession for those you lead, or your lack of it, will directly affect their welfare. (Thomas Constable)

John 13 begins the Upper Room Discourse (John 13-17).  Jesus is alone with His disciples (without Judas, the betrayer most of the time).  He wants to prepare them for living and ministering without Him.

First, Jesus shares the “last supper” with His disciples.  At the “first supper,” the feeding of the 5,000, the Jews wanted to exalt Jesus as King; at this supper, He identifies Himself as sacrifice.

John’s description of the time of the Last Supper seems to conflict with that of the Synoptics.  They present it as happening on Thursday evening, but many students of the fourth Gospel have interpreted John as locating it on Wednesday evening (13:1, 27; 18:28; 19:14, 31, 36, 42).  The Last Supper was a Passover meal that took place on Thursday evening.

Jesus begins by washing their feet, something a servant, or one of the disciples, should have done.  Jesus didn’t serve them because He felt inferior to them.  He knew (1) “that his hour had come to depart out of this world to the Father” (v. 1); (2) “that the Father had given all things into his hands, and (3) that he had come from God and (4) was going back to God” (v. 3).

Although He was the supreme and exalted Son of God, he “rose from supper. He laid aside his outer garments, and taking a towel, tied it around his waist” and began to wash the disciples’ feet.

Of course, we see here two people that are hard to serve: (1) someone who doesn’t want to be served, like Peter, and (2) someone who has (or will) hurt us, like Judas.  If I would have had foreknowledge that someone was going to betray me, I would have twisted their ankle.  But Jesus did not.

Jesus did this because “he loved them to the end” (to the uttermost) and he wanted to teach them a lesson of serving.  “Do like I have done to you.”

Jesus’ Ministry in the Upper Room is a… Picture of Jesus’ Humiliation and Exaltation
Jesus rose from supper, a place of comfort and rest Jesus rose from his throne in heaven, a place of comfort and rest
Jesus laid aside his garments Jesus laid aside his glory
Jesus took a towel and girded himself, ready to work Jesus took the form of a servant, ready to work
Jesus poured water in the basin, ready to cleanse Jesus poured out his blood to cleanse us from guilt and the penalty of sin
Jesus sat down against after washing their feet Jesus sat down at the right hand of God the father after cleansing us

Jesus then sends Judas away (vv. 18-20) and Judas departed (vv. 27-30).  I would assume that Jesus celebrated the “Lord’s Supper” after Judas departed.

Jesus gives them a “new commandment” (vv. 31-35).  The old commandment had to do with love as well, but it was “love your neighbor as yourself.”  This one aims higher–“love one another as I have loved you.”  In particular, serve one another like I just served you.

This chapter ends with the prediction of Peter’s denial (vv. 36-38).  Peter intended to die for Christ and wanted to, but in the end his will failed him.

We might say that Judas’ denial of Jesus was deliberate and planned; Peter’s denial of Jesus was accidental and spontaneous.  Peter’s denial was terrible, but it wasn’t the same as what Judas did. (David Guzik)

Before Peter could die for Jesus, Jesus must die for Peter.

Most of us don’t understand the weakness, the darkness, that resides within us.  Mark Sayer’s book on leadership, Facing Leviathan shows how neither the hero model of leadership nor the bohemian model of leadership really works, but rather this servant leadership expressed by Jesus.

Proverbs 10

The purpose of Proverbs 10:1-5 is to encourage the pursuit of one’s labors in righteousness, which excludes acquiring gain by unjust means (v. 2a) or squandering it by sloth (vv. 4-5).  At the center of these verses is the reason: The LORD does not let the righteous go hungry.  It is the Lord who provides (v. 3), and through righteousness he delivers not only from hunger but also from death(v. 2b).  The encouragement of the whole section to walk in righteousness is framed by the appeal to be a son who is wise (v. 1a) or prudent (v. 5a) rather than foolish (v. 1b) or shameful (v. 5b).

Although set in clusters, vv. 6-32 as a whole act to contrast the righteous and the wicked in order to illustrate that “righteousness” (v. 2) is the path for a wise son.

Proverbs 10:4 says “the hand of the diligent makes rich.”  While Proverbs 10:22 says “the blessing of the LORD makes rich.”  “The one notes the primary source of wealth; the other points to the instrumental source of wealth.  Neither can be effective without the other.  The sluggard looks for prosperity without diligence; the atheist looks for prosperity only from being diligent.” (Charles Bridges)

If you want to explore the Proverbs in more depth, you can receive Daily Proverb in your inbox each day.

Anybody up for a good mystery?  The New Testament has plenty.  This chart is from Thomas Constable…

NEW TESTAMENT REFERENCES TO “MYSTERIES”

(THINGS PREVIOUSLY UNKNOWN BUT NOW REVEALED)

Matt. 13:11 The secrets of the kingdom of heaven
Luke 8:10 The secrets (mysteries) of the kingdom of God
Rom. 11:25 Israel experiencing a hardening of heart
Rom. 16:25-26 The plan of salvation through Jesus Christ.
1 Cor. 4:1 New Testament revelation
1 Cor. 15:51 The Rapture
Eph. 1:9 God’s will
Eph. 3:2-3 The administration of God’s grace
Eph. 3:4 Christ
Eph. 3:9 The church
Eph. 5:32 Christ and the church
Col. 1:26 Christ in us, the hope of glory
Col. 1:27 Christ in us
Col. 2:2 Christ
Col. 4:3 Christ
2 Thess. 2:7 The secret power of lawlessness already at work
1 Tim. 3:9 The deep truths of the faith
1 Tim. 3:16 Godliness
Rev. 1:20 The seven stars (angels)
Rev. 10:7 The details of the Tribulation
Rev. 17:5 Babylon the great

Ephesians 3 is about the mystery which is the church.  Paul had introduced this subject in 2:11-22, talking about the “one new man” which God had created out of believing Jews and believing Gentiles.  A biblical “mystery” is something made known which had been unknown in the past (v. 5).

6 This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel.

This had not been revealed in the Old Testament.  Jesus referred to the church in Matthew 16:18, “I will build my church” and Matthew 18:17 “tell it to the church” but does not explain what He is referring to.  It was inaugurated on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2) when the Holy Spirit baptized believers into Jesus.

This mystery is not only significant for the church itself, but was an amazing spectacle to the “rulers and authorities in the heavenly places” (v. 10).

Paul’s prayer for the Ephesians is that their inner man, their spirit, might be strengthened to be able to comprehend the incomprehensible–the height, depth, length and breadth of Christ’s love for us.

These verses and other verses about God’s passionate love for us are vitally important for God to reveal to our hearts so that we “know and rely upon the love of God” (1 John 4:16) each moment.  When we are grabbed by God’s love, when we truly know it and feel it and rely upon it, then our love for Him will grow deeper and stronger, enabling us to say “no” to temptations and “yes” to God’s will.

And God is able to do this, if we ask

20 Now to him who is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think, according to the power at work within us, 21 to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, forever and ever.  Amen.

Take that by faith and pray for it.  Ask others to pray Paul’s prayer for you as well.

 

M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 22

Today’s readings are from Exodus 33, John 12, Proverbs 9 and Ephesians 2.

Exodus 33 consists of the people’s repentance (vv. 1-11); Moses’ intercession (vv. 12-16) and God’s agreement to go with Israel and reveal His glory to Moses (vv. 17-23).

Moses has just been informed that God would send Israel to Canaan with the promise of safe passage, with the Lord’s angel going before them, but without YHWH in their midst (Exodus 33:1-3).  Israel was overwhelmed with grief by this news (33:4-6).  God’s dwelling in their midst was what made them distinct, and now because of their stiff-necked sin, God was pulling back.

Are you disturbed at the prospect, however remote, that God’s presence might be withdrawn from your life because of your sin?

This separation is confirmed in 33:7-11, when Moses describes the kind of distant access Israel would be subjected to, now that the tabernacle plans had been destroyed (Exod 32:19).

When Moses intercedes, he prays for God’s presence, which is the most important thing (as we will see again in Numbers 13).  He prays according to God’s promises.  This is always important, that we link our prayers not to our merits or even our needs, but to God’s promises.  Moses also prays to learn more about God.

13 Now therefore, if I have found favor in your sight, please show me now your ways, that I may know you in order to find favor in your sight. Consider too that this nation is your people.”

Moses won a “yes” answer from God when he asked for the special presence of God to remain with Israel on the way to the Promised Land (Exodus 33:12-17).  He also won a confirmation of the promise from God and an affirmation of close relationship.  Yet he was still not satisfied. He wanted more in his personal relationship with God. (David Guzik)

This hunger for more is the true mark of revival.

A. W. Tozer, in his book The Pursuit of God has this prayer:

O God, I have tasted Your goodness, and it has both satisfied me and made me thirsty for more.  I am painfully conscious of my need of further grace.  I am ashamed of my lack of desire.  O God, the Triune God, I want to want You; I long to be filled with longing; I thirst to be made more thirsty still.  Show me Your glory, I pray, so I may know You indeed.  Begin in mercy a new work of love within me…  Give me grace to rise and follow You up from this misty lowland where I have wandered so long. In Jesus’ name.  Amen.

When Moses asks to see God’s glory (v. 18), God tells Moses that he will make His goodness pass before Moses (v. 19), but he cannot see God’s face or else die (v. 20).  Moses was placed in the cleft of the rock (v. 21) and saw Yahweh’s backside (v. 23).

Paul, in Philippians 3, wanted to be “found in Christ,” for that is the only place where we find protection from the wrath of God against our sins.

John 12 begins with Mary anointing Jesus’ feet with costly perfume and wiping them with her hair.

Love’s extravagance!

Let’s look at each part:

“Costly perfume” — According to the Archaeological Study Bible, one pint of nard would have cost about a year’s wage for a day-laborer.  Cheaper by far is one of the most expensive perfumes in the world today — Joy, by Jean Patou.  Henri Alméras designed and brewed the perfume in 1929.  He mixed jasmine odor and rose in the perfume.  Each 30 ml perfume in the bottle includes the extraction of 10,000 jasmine flowers combined with 28 dozen roses. It sells for only (!) $800 per ounce.

“anointed Jesus’ feet” — This was unusual.  Usually the head was anointed.

“wiped them with her hair” — This is almost scandalous.  A proper woman would not show her hair in a public setting.

Of course, Judas objected.  He began by stealing from the “common purse” and ultimately betrayed Jesus for thirty pieces of silver.

Every time we see Mary, she is down at Jesus’ feet (Luke 10:38-42 learning; John 11, praying; John 12 worshiping).  Barclay mentions three significant things communicated by Mary’s worship–it was extravagant; it was humble; it was unself-conscious.

John 12:12-36 is John’s record of the triumphal entry.  Jesus rode in on a donkey, a symbol of peace, when he could have ridden in on a horse, symbolizing war.

John is the only gospel writer to tell us that Greeks sought out Jesus.  They wanted to see Jesus.

“We would see Jesus.”  What a wonderful thought for pastors as they step into their pulpits.  And what a wonderful thought for each of us as we live our lives in front of our families, our neighbors, our co-workers.

Philip and Andrew presented them to Jesus.  His first response is that “the hour has come for the Son of Man to be glorified.”  Apparently this appearance of Gentiles before this Jewish Messiah was the tipping point.  Up until now it had not been his hear (John 2:4; 7:6, 30; 8:20).

Then Jesus said…

24 Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. 25 Whoever loves his life loses it, and whoever hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life.

In order to bear spiritual fruit, we must die.  We cannot protect our life and experience growth in our life.  We must “hate” our life by putting ourselves at risk.

This chapter ends by showing the unbelief of the people (John 12:37-50).  So many signs had been performed, but they did not believe, so Jesus pronounces the Isaiah “curse” on them, which merely explains why they did not believe.

Part of the reason for their unbelief was the fear of man, that they would be unpopular if they did believe in Jesus (12:42-44).

David Guzik then summarizes the last verses:

These are the last words in John’s gospel from Jesus to the public.  In this last speech to the multitude, Jesus emphasized the themes of all His previous preaching in John.

He who sees Me sees Him who sent Me: Jesus stressed His unity with God the Father.

I have come as light into the world: Jesus stressed His own truthfulness, and the need man has to follow Jesus.

I do not judge Him: Jesus stressed His love and acceptance for the sinner; yet the word that I have spoken will judge Him — there are inescapable consequences for rejecting Jesus.

I have not spoken on My own authority: Jesus stressed His own submission to God the Father. His authority flowed from His submission to God the Father.

Proverbs 9

Proverbs 9 contrasts wisdom and folly in a very symmetrical structure.  Verses 1-6 correspond to verses 13-18 remarkably.  This chiastic form of presentation sets off the central verses (vv. 7-12) as the most important in the chapter.  Both Wisdom and Folly invite the youth to seek them.

The purpose of the similarity is to highlight the differences, which present Lady Wisdom as clearly desirable in all respects.  The description of Lady Wisdom is given more space (12 out of 18 verses), contains a summary of her teaching (vv. 6-10), and has her narrating the consequences of her way (vv. 11-12).  Notice her preparation in vv. 1-2.  She offers her own preparations (reality), whereas folly offers stolen goods (v. 17, illusion).

The description of Lady Folly, by contrast, while emphasizing the emptiness of her character (v. 13), lacks any of her crooked instruction (i.e., nothing follows the address and appeal in vv. 16-17), and has her end narrated about her rather than by her (v. 18).  (ESV Study Bible)

Unlike gracious Wisdom, who sends out her servants with invitations (v. 3), pompous Folly sits there like the queen of the town and expects us to be impressed (v. 14). She does have an undeniable appeal: “Stolen water is sweet” (v.17).  Our foolish hearts relish sin as exciting and glamorous.  But the truth is this: folly’s menu is water and bread (v. 17), sweetened only by “the fleeting pleasures of sin” (Heb. 11:25), while Wisdom’s feast is wine and meat (v. 2), leading to eternal life (v. 6).  (ESV Gospel Transformation Student Bible)

These two rival invitations bring this section of Proverbs to a climax.  The youth (reader) must now make a decision: Which one will he or she follow?

Wisdom has a starting place–the fear of the Lord.  G. Campbell Morgan wrote:

“We are ever beginning; every morning we start afresh; every task we take up is a new start; every venture in joy or in effort, must have its commencement.  Then let every beginning be in the fear of Jehovah.  That is Wisdom, and it leads in the way of Wisdom.”

And…

“In every city, on every street, by every door of opportunity, these two voices of wisdom and folly are appealing to men.  To obey the call of wisdom is to live.  To yield to the clamor of folly is to die.  How shall we discern between the voices?  By making the fear of Jehovah the central inspiration of life.  By yielding the being at its deepest to Him for correction and guidance.”

Ephesians 2 begins with the bad news (2:1-3)–before God’s grace presented Christ to us and enabled faith in us, we were dead (v. 1), disobedient (v. 2), depraved (v. 3) and doomed (v. 3).  BUT GOD–the most beautiful words on earth!

But God reversed all that…the good news is that now we made alive (v. 5a), seated in the heavenlies (v. 6) and will experience “immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness” throughout eternity (v. 7).

According to vv. 8-9 the basis of our salvation is God’s “grace” (unmerited favor and divine enablement; cf. Rom. 3:22, 25; Gal. 2:16; 1 Pet. 1:5).  The instrument by which we receive salvation is “faith” (i.e., trust in Christ).  Faith is not an act or work that earns merit with God, which He rewards with salvation.

What is the gift of God?  What does “that” or “this” refer back to?  Gift if neuter, but “grace” and “faith” are both feminine.  Probably it refers to the whole preceding clause that describes salvation (cf. 1:15; 3:1).

E. K. Simpson says…

“If we breathe, it is because life has been breathed into us; if we exercise the hearing of faith it is because our ears have been unstopped.  We are born from above.  Spiritual life is not of the nature of a subsidy supplementing dogged exertion or ruthless self-flagellation, but a largess from the overflowing well-spring of divine compassion, lavished on a set of spiritual incapables.”

Another truth to remember is that because we have not been saved by our good works, neither can we be lost by our bad works.

Verse 10 gives another reason salvation is not from man or by works.  Rather than salvation being a masterpiece that we have produced, regenerated believers are a masterpiece that God has produced.

“Good works” are not the roots from which salvation grows, but the fruit that God intends it to bear.  God has not saved us because of our works (vv. 8-9), but He has saved us to do good works (v. 10).  God saves us by faith for good works.  Good works are what God intended for us to practice, with His divine enablement.  He intended that we “would walk in them,” as a pedestrian walks along a path, even before He saved us (cf. 1:4).  This verse reveals that God is ultimately responsible for our good works (cf. Rom. 9:23; Phil. 2:13). (Thomas Constable)

I’ve quoted G. Campbell Morgan twice already today.  Here is another quote that expands on Ephesians 2:10…

“God has foreordained the works to which He has called you.  He has been ahead of you preparing the place to which you are coming and manipulating all the resources of the universe in order that the work you do may be a part of His whole great and gracious work.” (AZ Quotes)

Doesn’t that make you want to say “Yes” to all God has for you?

The remainder of Ephesians 2 shows that salvation is not merely about individual regeneration.  It is also about corporate reconciliation.  We are brought into a relationship not only with God, but with other believers.

Of course, the great dividing wall in the first century Mediterranean world was between Jews and Gentiles.  Of course, we talking about Gentile believers here.  However, the Jews were very ethnocentric (or racist).  It took a lot of convincing (Acts 10-11, 15) for Jewish Christians to believe that even Gentiles, if they believed, could be considered part of the same body, the body of Christ.

So Paul talks about the reality of that union of all believers, no matter what race, in Christ (vv. 11-13), then explained exactly what that involves (vv. 14-18) and ends with the consequences (vv. 19-22).

Prior to the cross, Gentiles were “separated from Christ, alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world” (2:12).

BUT NOW another wonderful intervention of God has occurred–“in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ” (2:13).  Everything that once divided them had been abolished.

The “dividing wall” had been brought down just like the Berlin Wall in 1989.  The “dividing wall” (soreg) was the low-standing wall in the temple area that barred the Gentiles from getting too close to the temple.

This is the best image I could find of the temple mount.  It is from JW.org

During excavations of Jerusalem in 1871, two archaeologists, Clermont and Ganneau, discovered what is known as the Soreg Inscription. Written in Greek, the sign warns non-Jews to keep out of the temple area. It states:
 
“No foreigner is to enter the barriers surrounding the sanctuary. He who is caught will have himself to blame for his death which will follow.”

Image result for soreg

On the cross, Christ put to death the hostility between Israel and the other nations.

Thomas Constable writes:

Jesus Christ had two purposes in ending Jewish Gentile hostility.  First, He wanted to “create” one new man, the church (v. 6), out of the two former groups, Jews and Gentiles (v. 11).  Here the “new man” is not the individual believer but the church, the body of Christ (cf. 1:22-23; 1 Cor. 12:12-13; Col. 3:10-11; Heb. 12:23).  In the church, God does not deal with Gentiles as He did with Jews, nor does He deal with Jews as He did Gentiles.  Jews do not become Gentiles, nor do Gentiles become Jews.  Rather, God has created a whole new (Gr. kainon, fresh) entity: the church.

Jesus Christ’s second purpose for ending Jewish Gentile hostility was to bring (“reconcile”) Jewish and Gentile believers to Himself in “one body”: the church.  The Old Testament never spoke of Jewish and Gentile believers as being in “one body.”  Ironically, the Cross in one sense terminated Jesus, but Jesus terminated the enmity between Jews and Gentiles “with (through) the Cross.”  Not only have Jews and Gentiles experienced reconciliation with one another (vv. 14-15), but they have also experienced reconciliation with God by the Cross (v. 16).  The Cross satisfied God’s justice; it propitiated Him (cf. 1 John 2:2).

God’s plan for believers included the building of a new entity after Jesus Christ’s death, resurrection, and ascension (cf. Matt. 16:18).  It was to be the church.  The church is not just a continuation and modernization of Israel under a new name but a new creation (v. 15).  In the church, Jewish and Gentile believers stand with equal rights and privileges before God.  Membership in this new body is one of the great blessings of believers in the present age, along with individual blessings (vv. 1-10).  Paul glorified God for that blessing in this section of Ephesians.

John Stott enjoins us:

“I wonder if anything is more urgent today, for the honour of Christ and for the spread of the gospel, than that the church should be, and should be seen to be, what by God’s purpose and Christ’s achievement it already is—a single new humanity, a model of human community, a family of reconciled brothers and sisters who love their Father and love each other, the evident dwelling place of God by his Spirit.  Only then will the world believe in Christ as Peacemaker.  Only then will God receive the glory due to his name.

God’s Indictment of Israel (Hosea 4:1-3)

[Remember that this is a transcript for a radio broadcast, but longer than the actual broadcast.]

Thank you for joining me again in our study of the book of Hosea.  We have studied the first three chapters, which were more biographical in nature—using the marriage of Hosea and Gomer as a picture of God’s relationship with Israel.

Derek Kidner reminds us that…

[The book of Hosea] has begun to do what no other Old Testament book does quite so vividly: to speak of God and His people not primarily in terms of master and servant, or king and subjects (indispensable as these categories are), but as man and wife, with all that this implies of personal delight and potential hurt.

This approach is far from sentimental.  It sharpens guilt immeasurably by making it the betrayal of love; it shows the true motive of God’s persistence, so easily thought to be mere doggedness; and it deepens our understanding of repentance and renewal—for sins against love damage the very roots of a relationship, and are not healed by brisk apologies and hasty resolutions (The Message of Hosea, p. 45).

John Maxwell, a pastor and consultant who has written a number of books on leadership, has said, “Everything rises and falls on leadership.”  In this passage Hosea says it like this: “like people, like priest” in verse 9.  Much of the charges God lays out against Israel in Hosea 4 is directed against the priests, those who were given charge of educating Israel in God’s law.

Nothing is quite as revealing about a society, nor nearly so determinate, as the character of its leadership.  Israel, though God’s elect nation, was no exception.  The men in responsible positions of religious leadership—had failed to provide the caliber of leadership necessary to assure the national well-being.  The failure contributed to the nation’s religious and moral decline, and ultimately, to their devastation at the hands of Assyria.

But before God indicts the leaders, the priests in particular, lays a charge against the people of Israel.

Hosea 4:1-3 says…

1 Hear the word of the LORD, O children of Israel, for the LORD has a controversy with the inhabitants of the land. There is no faithfulness or steadfast love, and no knowledge of God in the land; 2 there is swearing, lying, murder, stealing, and committing adultery; they break all bounds, and bloodshed follows bloodshed. 3 Therefore the land mourns, and all who dwell in it languish, and also the beasts of the field and the birds of the heavens, and even the fish of the sea are taken away.

Any complacency which the happy ending of the first three chapters may have induced on the reader (if he has begun to picture God as the ever-accomodating husband), is now abruptly shattered.

Chapter 1 began with the words “the word of the Lord came to Hosea” and here in chapter 4, verse 1 we read “Hear the word of the Lord.”  This marks the beginning of a new section of the book.  Chapters 4—14 contain speeches that Hosea probably gave at various times in his long prophetic career.

Thomas McComiskey writes:

“At this point we leave the account of Hosea’s marriage and begin a new section, which extends to the end of the book and contains oracles of doom and hope.  Even in this section, however, we are never far from Hosea’s marriage, for it is always in the background and is the catalyst for his message to his people.  We see it in the references to the nation as mother and children, as well as in the numerous allusions to spiritual harlotry and adultery.”

Ronald Vandermay sees three attributes of God exhibited here: His holiness in chaps. 4-7; His justice in chaps. 8-10 and His love in chaps. 11-14.  “As God’s holiness demands that the nation of Israel receive an indictment for her sin, so also His justice requires that Israel should be punished.  But in the midst of these two great attributes a third is at work: the love of God, which has as its chief goal the restoration of God’s people to himself.

In this nearer context, Duane Garrett sees a threefold pattern in this structure indicating that Hosea’s three children continue to dominate the pattern of his prophecy.  So he sees the chapter 4, vv. 1-3 organized around Jezreel, due to the presence of murder in Israel.  The Lo-Ammi section is vv. 4-14, which address three groups and show the alienation between Israel and Yahweh.  Finally, there is Lo-Ruhamah, with three warnings for Judah and Israel.

This chapter may be divided into the charge of divine indignation (vv. 1-2) and its consequences (v. 3), charges particularly against the priests (vv. 4-11) and their followers because of gross idolatrous practices (vv. 12-14), capped off by a solemn warning to Judah not to follow in her sister’s footsteps (vv. 15-19).

Here Yahweh brings a legal charge against the Israelites for breaking the Mosaic covenant.  The offenses are stated in the negative in verse 1 and positively in verse 2.  This indictment is all the more telling because they are precisely what God pre-eminently looks for in our relationship with Him and one another.

Although not exactly a court case against Israel, this is the language being used here.  Thus, David Hubbard notes:

“Since a number of ingredients are lacking—a summons to witnesses (cf. Mi. 6:3-5), questions and answers about divine requirements (cf. Mi. 6:6-8)—it is more likely that the literary form compresses an argument or quarrel between Yahweh and the people rather than a scene of formal legal charges.”

Nevertheless, what charges God is bringing against Israel signal that they have broken covenant with God.  This is especially the language of verse 1…

There is no faithfulness or steadfast love, and no knowledge of God in the land

Essentially, Yahweh is saying, “I can’t trust you.”  How sad that sounds.

We know how vital trust is in any relationship, but especially in a marriage.  When that trust is broken, it may take a long time, and hard work, to win it back.  It doesn’t happen overnight.

First of all, there was no “faithfulness” in the land.  The word here is emeth, which can mean truthfulness in word or action.  Here is likely has the idea of integrity or faithfulness to the relationship  and the sanctity of it.

The Israelites might make promises, but they would be empty.  They might act, but their hearts were devious.

Second, there was no “steadfast love” in the land.  This is the word chesed, in Hebrew, the word often used to define the motivation behind making and keeping covenant.  With faithfulness gone, there was no steadfast love, and vice versa.

Covenant love will once again be operative when God draws the whole house of Israel back to Himself (2:19; 10:12; 12:6; Jeremiah 31:1-3; cf. Psalm 17:7; 25:6; 69:16; 103:4; Isaiah 63:7; Jeremiah 9:24; 16:5; 32:18).  Covenant love, or loyalty, is not simply a matter of fulfilling one’s duties to a covenant obligation; it is going beyond legal obligations to give kindness freely those with whom one relates.

Duane Garrett illustrates how this word is used.  He says…

When Lot proclaimed that the angels had shown him great chesed, in saving his life, he meant that they had given him mercy that he did not deserve, not that merely fulfilled some kind of duty to him (Gen. 19:19).  When Ruth offered herself in marriage to Boaz, he called it a great act of chesed, not meaning that she had fulfilled an obligation to him or to Naomi, but that she had gone far beyond what was required (Ruth 3:10).

The common thread here is that people are in relationship with one another, but that the person who shows chesed goes beyond basic requirements and freely gives kindness to the other.  Thus, chesed exists in a marriage when the husband goes beyond the minimal requirements of a husband’s obligations and shows real kindness to his wife. (Hosea, Joel, p. 119).

But more damning and more primary than these two deficits was that there was “no knowledge of God in the land.”  Any claim to it was already denied by the absence of the first two qualities.

Knowing God in the context of Hosea is deeply personal.  It is not knowing about God, although objective facts are involved, but knowing God in a deep, personal, intimate, experiential sense.  It is a personal relationship in which a person can honestly say, “You are my God” (Hosea 2:23).

It is also vitally important.  It was already mentioned in Hosea 2:8, 13 and 20; now here in Hosea 4:1, 6, 11, 14; in 5:4 and 15; Hosea 6:3 and 6; Hosea 8:2 and 13:6 and alluded to in several other places.

Not knowing God was Israel’s basic problem at this time, as indicated by Hosea 4:6:

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

This is not knowledge of the law, or math or science, but specifically a knowledge of God.  A. W. Tozer said, “What comes into our minds when we think about God is the most important thing about us” and I would encourage you to read his little book The Knowledge of the Holy.

If you are more ambitious, I would encourage you to read J. I. Packer’s influential book, Knowing God.

When I was preaching through the attributes of God at Grace Bible Church a number of years ago, I made the distinction that we need to think both accurately and adequately about God.  Obviously, we need to think accurately about God.  We need to think of Him as the Bible presents Him, not as we would wish Him to be.  This is why God forbade making idols, because they could never capture the fullness of God’s perfections; instead caricaturing God by making one or a few attributes stand out to the exclusion of others.

But we also need to think adequately about God.  This is what I think increases our love for Him, our amazement and wonder of God.  For example, God is not just holy, but He is “holy, holy, holy.”  He is “rich in mercy,” “abounds in love” and “lavishes us with His grace.”  When we realize how over-the-top God is about us, our hearts are warmed and we experience that love that draws us into a deeper relationship with Him.

Unfortunately, that was not only missing in ancient Israel, but also our churches as well.

Derek Kidner comments:

“He is weighing Israel in the balance against faithfulness, kindness and the knowledge of God, only to find her wanting at every point: utterly light on all things that matter.  These three things lead us from the outskirts of goodness to its heart and centre, and at each point God finds in His people this fatal lack” (The Message of Hosea, p. 46).

As long as the knowledge of God was not found in the people of Israel, there would be no faithfulness and steadfast love in the life and activity of Israel.  Nor can there be in any other society, be it ancient or modern, because no society can possess “faithfulness” and “steadfast love” in the final analysis without a genuine knowledge of God.

Essentially the deficit of the heart attitudes in verse 1 reveal that Israel was breaking  the first table of the Ten Commandments, those directed towards Yahweh.

It is no wonder, then, that Israel was breaking the second table of the law as well.  Now put in the positive, Yahweh charges…

2 there is swearing, lying, murder, stealing, and committing adultery; they break all bounds, and bloodshed follows bloodshed.

We are accountable to both sins of omission (v. 1) and sins of commission (v. 2).

Did you notice that these have to do with the breaking of the sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth commandments?  The order differs from the two passages which lay out the Ten Commandments—Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5—and there is no clear indication why.

It may be to indicate the order of frequency, from greater to lesser.  On the other hand, it may have been put in this order for the purpose of showing, in ascending order, the danger to the community or for the provocation of the wrath of Yahweh.

In any case, the breaking of the commandments reflected the people’s attitude towards their covenantal responsibilities to one another.  Because they had no knowledge of God, they had no respect for one another.

All of these listed offenses are infinites in Hebrew, and E. B. Pusey explains what this signifies:

“The Hebrew form is very vivid and solemn.  It is far more forcible than if he had said, ‘They swear, lie, kill, and steal.’  It expresses that these sins were continual, that nothing else (so to speak) was going on; that it was all one scene of such sins, one course of them, and of nothing besides; as we say more familiarly, ‘It was all, swearing, lying, killing, stealing, committing adultery.'” (The Minor Prophets, 1:46).

This list makes us realize that God doesn’t distinguish, as we often do, between serious and light offenses.  We would likely shrug our shoulders at someone swearing, but think murder and adultery are especially wrong.  But God doesn’t distinguish the way we do.

Also, it is important to realize that these sins are reaching to the point of no return.  We never know where that is, but there is a point where God’s patience runs out.  Patience is, you realize, the only attribute of God that is not infinite.

When virtues are lacking, vices are present, each of which is represented by terms plucked verbatim from Israel’s law code.

Doesn’t this sound so much like the United States?  Having forbidden prayer and Bible reading from public schools, our schools have become dangerous places, with murders and sexual abuse.

Education expert William Jeynes spoke at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. on Aug. 13, 2014 and said…

“One can argue, and some have, that the decision by the Supreme Court – in a series of three decisions back in 1962 and 1963 – to remove Bible and prayer from our public schools, may be the most spiritually significant event in our nation’s history over the course of the last 55 years.”

On June 25, 1962, the United States Supreme Court decided in Engel v. Vitale that a prayer approved by the New York Board of Regents for use in schools violated the First Amendment because it represented establishment of religion. In 1963, in Abington School District v. Schempp, the court decided against Bible readings in public schools along the same lines.

Since 1963, Jeynes said there have been five negative developments in the nation’s public schools:

  • Academic achievement has plummeted, including SAT scores.
  • Increased rate of out-of-wedlock births
  • Increase in illegal drug use
  • Increase in juvenile crime
  • Deterioration of school behavior

Other facts included a comparison between the top five complaints of teachers from 1940-1962 — talking, chewing gum, making noise, running in the halls and getting out of turn in line – to rape, robbery, assault, burglary and arson from 1963 to present.

That last sentence sounds like it was taken right out of Hosea 4:2!  That is the consequence of removing the knowledge of God from our cultural life.

The first charge is “swearing,” which likely took the form of a curse, an imprecatory prayer or a man calling on Yahweh to support a falsehood.  It had the effect of denying faithfulness (v. 1) to one’s word.  It reflected a contempt for others.  It made real community an impossible dream.

Next, and likely occurring along with “swearing,” is “lying.”  This, too, deprives others of faithfulness.  It takes the form of dishonesty and deception.  It denies a person the right to fairness and justice in the market place, a court of law, or in any relationship.

If these first two, “swearing and lying” are a hendiadyes, then it refers to lying under oath.  But it is more likely that “swearing” breaks the third commandment and “lying” the ninth.

Paul shows us the importance of truthfulness in Ephesians 4:25 when he says…

25 Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another.

Paul’s reasoning for this “put off—put on” is the reality that lying rips the fabric of our relationships with one another.  There is no real community without truthfulness.

The third charge is “killing.”  Though the Old Testament allowed for divinely authorized killing of guilty persons, it denied a man the right to kill a fellow human being out of jealousy, hatred, revenge or lust.

But this was obviously happening in Israel.

This reflected a lack of steadfast love for their fellow countrymen and a lack of respect for human life and dignity.

The next thing with which they were charged was “stealing.”  Stealing denied a person’s right to material possessions that were entrusted to them by Yahweh, the ultimate owner of everything.

Finally, the people of Israel were charged with “adultery.”  This denied a person’s right to faithfulness and steadfast love within his own home.  Attacking the family in such a way, endangered the whole of society.

The verb in verse 2 is the term “break out,” so it is indicating that all these sins against one another run rampant, like an uncontrollable flood.  This is emphasized by “bloodshed follows bloodshed” as if it were an unstoppable force cascading down the mountain.  It is what Garrett believes signifies that this section is more closely related to Jezreel, because back in 1:4 Yahweh had declared, “I will bring the bloodshed of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu.”

Even though the primary blame will soon be placed in the lap of the religious leaders of Israel, the moral decline within the nation had become so widespread that the controversy was referred to as being “with the inhabitants of the land.”

There’s a movement going on within the realm of Christianity today where people are saying, “I don’t want to be known for what I am against, but what I am for.”  While that sounds good and noble, Eric Davis at Cripplegate, challenges that reasoning.  He says things like…

We don’t usually approach life that way, at least not wisely.  We teach our children what to avoid for their own good.  We hope our doctor is against things that are not good for us.

Also, to construct and conduct a good, stable society, we must be known for being against things.  We need to be against rape, pedophilia, sexual abuse.  We can’t just be for everything.

Actually, even the person who wants to be known for what they are for are also known for what they are against.  If you are for homosexuality, you are against heterosexuality.

Whatever the case may be, the person who wants to be known for what they are for cannot escape that they are known for what they are also against. The difference could simply be that it is more socially fashionable in certain sub-cultures to be known for being against the particular things that they are against. So, the real issue is not that they want to be known for what they are for, so much as it is that they want to be known for being for a particular subset of currently trendy ideologies.

More importantly, there are things that God wants us to be known for being against.  The Ten Commandments, for example, give us a list of ten things God is against.  The New Testament also has its lists of fleshly expressions it is against.  God is against false teaching as well.

Frankly, the ministries of men like Hosea, and all the Old Testament prophets as well as John the Baptist, were known primarily for what they were against.

Most emphatically, Jesus was known (and hated) for what he was against.  He was especially against the attitudes of self-promotion, self-actualization and self-glorifying among the religious leaders (Matthew 23:5-6).

Much of the content of the New Testament is against some sin or false teaching.  And finally, the desire to be known for what we are for rather than known for what we are against is primarily motivated by culture more than Scripture.

So, like God, we should be ready to rebuke these expressions of sin which break both the first and the second tables of God’s law.

These thoroughgoing violations of the terms of the royal covenant call for a commensurate judgment.  The word “therefore” at the beginning of verse 3 steels them to hear it, but hardly prepares them for its scope.

The judgment seems to be in the form of a drought, a sentence appropriate to their reliance upon Baal for rain and growth and harvest.  It will be so severe that “all who dwell in it languish.”  This was predicted by God in His covenant warnings back in Leviticus 26:13 and Deuteronomy 28:23-24.  This judgment extends to the animal kingdom as well, affecting all three domains (land, air and sea).  In Genesis 1, these are created in the reverse order.  That is also true in the dominion text in Genesis 1:28.

David Hubbard notes:

The annihilation of the animal kingdom is picture in language that outstrips the flood story, where at least representatives of each species were preserved (Gen. 6:18-22).  Hosea’s holocaust resembles closely Zephaniah’s (12:2-3) and echoes Genesis 1:30 in such a way that the appointed judgment for Israel’s sin is nothing less than the “reversal of creation.  Thus, Yahweh’s restoration, promised in 2:15-23, must include a covenant renewal with the entire animal kingdom (v. 18).

We know from Genesis 3 and Romans 8 that the destiny of all of God’s creation is tied to ours.  When we sinned, death and decay and all kinds of judgment fell upon the creation.  But when we are “brought in the glorious freedom of the children of God” (Romans 8:20), all creation will be made new.  Prior to that, there will be a time when man and animal and all creation will live together in peace and prosperity, according to Isaiah.

It is put vividly in Leviticus 18, where a catalogue of perversions culminates in a warning “lest the land vomit you out when you make it unclean, as it vomited out the nation that was before you” (18:28).  When man has no knowledge of God and no restraints in his violence against one another, we sacrifice the whole future for the cravings of a moment.

Anderson and Freedman summarize this portion by saying…

Yahweh’s ultimate passion is for chesed.  He has an unswerving commitment to covenant obligations.  The curses and blessings of the covenant work out in two contradictory directions–destruction and recreation.  The crisis in the mind of Yahweh is forced by fact, heartbreaking for him, that Israel’s chesed is so ephemeral–like morning mist, like clouds, insubstantial and speedily dissipated.  In contrast to this, Yahweh’s declaration is as certain as the daybreak.  In his chesed Yahweh is unalterably committed to two things: he will have a people of his own; and he will relentlessly punish the covenant violater.  These commitments collide and the collision leads to an impossible situation because the drive to punish and the drive to accept his people unconditionally are equally manifestations of his chesed, his determination to keep the promises he has made in both these areas.  He looked above all for a chesed in relation to match His own (6:6), but Israel’s chesed was like vapor (6:4a).  Hence Yahweh’s question to himself, “What shall I do?” (6:4)

For hundreds of years this question had grown in intensity.  The answer had been put off.  Yahweh was “slow to anger.”  He often relented and restrained Himself.  According to the analysis of Israel’s prophetic historians, toward the middle of the eighth century even the patience of Yahweh was exhausted.  At last the will for justice overcame the compassion which had hitherto restrained the divine anger.  The covenant curses are to be put into operation.  The punishment is describe in passages of unexampled horror.  They are made the more frightening because all secondary agents disappear, and the acts are ascribed to Yahweh himself.  He will rip, injure, hack and kill (5:14; 6:1, 5; cf. 11:9).

In Hosea we meet for the first time the clear statement of an astounding solution to this problem–Yahweh’s problem.  This solution satisfied both sides of his chesed.  Guilty Israel will be executed; that will satisfy covenant justice.  Then the people of Yahweh will be reconstituted through resurrection.  (Hosea, 328-329)

But that awaits full expression in Hosea 6.

 

M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 21

Today’s readings are from Exodus 32, John 11, Proverbs 8 and Ephesians 1.

Exodus 32 reveals Israel breaking covenant with Yahweh.  They had pledged their obedience, saying, “All that the LORD has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient” (Exodus 24:7) but here they reveal that, like us, our faithfulness is like the morning dew.

With Moses delayed upon the mountain, they impatiently desire a god to lead them onward.  Aaron plays along, offering to make an idol, a golden calf.

This ancient bronze bull figurine may have been covered in gold leaf

This ancient bronze bull figurine may have been covered in gold leaf.

Image result for golden calf mold

Dr. Curtis Ward thinks this may have been the mold used to make the calf idol.

The “calf” provided a visible symbol that the Israelites could and did identify as their “deliverer” (“This is your god, O Israel, who brought you up from the land of Egypt”).

“Throughout the remainder of the Pentateuch, the incident of the worship of the golden calf cast a dark shadow across Israel’s relationship with God, much the same way as the account of the Fall in Genesis 3 marked a major turning point in God’s dealing with humankind” (John Sailhammer, The Pentateuch, p. 310).

This is a serious offense against Yahweh, a betrayal of His redemption and covenant (cf. Acts 7:38-42).  He offered to destroy the Israelites and start over again with Moses (v. 10).  But Moses interceded (vv. 11-13) between Yahweh and the Israelites.  He reminded Yahweh of His actions for Israel in delivering them, how it would smear His name among the nations to destroy Israel now, and of His promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

So “the LORD relented.”  Some versions have “changed His mind.”  Does this deny God’s immutability or foreknowledge?  One way of looking at this is that it is an anthropopathism, a way of explaining God’s ways in terms of human emotions.  Another way of explaining it is that God didn’t really “change” His mind, but took a different path to reaching His foreordained conclusion.

Thomas Constable explains that approach…

Within the plan of God, however, He has incorporated enough flexibility so that, in most situations, there are a number of options that are acceptable to Him.  In view of Moses’ intercession, God proceeded to take a different course of action than He had previously intended.

Ephesians 1:11 says that God causes everything to work out the way He wants it to (cf. Rom. 8:28).  He foreordains what comes to pass, but Scripture doesn’t say that He foreordains how everything will come to pass, or when it will come to pass, or by whom it will come to pass.  Prayer and evangelism are two of the means that God has ordained, that is, human activity, whereby what He has foreordained comes to pass.  In these activities, people become partners with God in bringing His will to happen in the world.

Occasionally, my wife has called me at work and asked me to pick up a gallon on milk on my way home.  When this happens, I take a different route than I would normally, but I end up at home nonetheless.  Perhaps this is similar to how our praying affects God as He carries out His will.

That may not be satisfying to everyone, because the text does say, “God relented” or “changed his mind.”

See John Munro, “Prayer to a Sovereign God,” Interest 56:2 (February 1990):20-21; Thomas L. Constable, “What Prayer Will and Will Not Change,” in Essays in Honor of J. Dwight Pentecost, pp. 99-113; and Robert B. Chisholm Jr., “Does God ‘Change His Mind’?” Bibliotheca Sacra 152:608 (October-December 1995):387-99.

“In only two of the thirty-eight instances in the OT is this word used of men repenting. God’s repentance or ‘relenting’ is an anthropomorphism (a description of God in human forms [sic form]) that aims at showing us that he can and does change in his actions and emotions to men when given proper grounds for doing so, and thereby he does not change in his basic integrity or character (cf. Pss 99:6; 106:45; Jer 18:8; Amos 7:3, 6; Jonah 3:10; James 5:16). The grounds for the Lord’s repenting are three: (1) intercession (cf. Amos 7:1-6); (2) repentance of the people (Jer 18:3-11; Jonah 3:9-10); and (3) compassion (Deut 32:36; Judg 2:18; 2 Sam 24:16[; 1 Chron. 21:15])” (Walter Kaiser, Exodus, p. 479).

And Cole says…

“We are not to think of Moses as altering God’s purpose towards Israel by this prayer, but as carrying it out: Moses was never more like God than in such moments, for he shared God’s mind and loving purpose.”

So Moses confronts Aaron and Aaron makes excuses (32:21-24).  Moses offered the challenge, “Who is on the LORD’s side?” and the Levites responded.  They then went through the camp and killed 3,000 people.  Moses confronted the people with their “great sin,” offered to make atonement for them and went back to intercede with Yahweh (32:30-32).  God’s response is that He would deal with the sinners, but Moses was to lead them to the place they had been promised (32:33-35).

John 11

Although his close friend Lazarus was seriously ill (v. 2), Jesus did not immediately go to help him even though he dearly loved Lazarus and his sisters (vv. 3-5).

What does Jesus mean by “This sickness does not lead to death”?  If Lazarus was already dead (which is quite possible), this is still a weird way to say it.  Given the fact that Jesus will later promise a life that overcomes death (v. 26), He may have meant the “second death” (Rev. 20:6), eternal death.  Again, this is not a normal way to communicate this idea.

Spurgeon says that the Lord “speaks of things, not as they seem to be, nor even as they are in the present moment, but as they shall be in the long run.”

Jesus stayed another couple of days, so that Lazarus would be in the grave four days and this miracle would glorify God and the Son.

Why 4 days?  There was a Jewish custom that the spirit hovered around the body for three days, but left on the fourth.  In other words, Lazarus was REALLY DEAD.

When Jesus spoke of returning to Judea, His disciples thought it was a crazy idea (v. 8).  Jesus responded that He had time to do what needed to be done (v. 9) and that Lazarus would rise again (v. 10).  In this conversation, Jesus affirmed that Lazarus was dead.

“So we may learn that He often permits us to pass into profounder darkness, and deeper mysteries of pain, in order that we may prove more perfectly His power.” (G. Campbell Morgan)

So Jesus traveled to Bethany near Jerusalem.

When Jesus arrived, Martha expressed her faith that Jesus could have healed Lazarus, if he had gotten there sooner (vv. 21-22).  Jesus simply said…

23 Jesus said to her, “Your brother will rise again.”

Martha thought he meant the resurrection of the dead for all believers, but Jesus meant she would see him again in this life.  Jesus does, however, give the promise that all believers will rise.

“Death comes to the ungodly man as a penal infliction, but to the righteous as a summons to his Father’s palace: to the sinner it is an execution, to the saint an undressing.  Death to the wicked is the King of terrors: death to the saint is the end of terrors, the commencement of glory.” (Spurgeon)

When Mary came to meet Jesus, she was weeping and expressed her own faith that Jesus could have healed Lazarus (vv. 32-33).  When Jesus came to the tomb of Lazarus, he wept (11:35).

Photo from Gospel Devotions

This would be a typical tomb in the first century.  This would be inside a cave and bodies of family members would be wrapped and placed in one of the three burial chambers you see here.  After one year when the flesh has gone away, they would gather the bones in burial boxes (ossuaries) and put them on a “shelf” inside the family tomb.

In v. 33 we read that Jesus “was deeply moved in his spirit and greatly troubled.”  Both words have the idea of a guttural but vocal response of deep emotion.

It means that Jesus wasn’t so much sad at the scene surrounding the tomb of Lazarus. It’s more accurate to say that Jesus was angry.  Jesus was angry and troubled at the destruction and power of the great enemy of humanity: death.  Jesus would soon break the dominating power of death.

Jesus was angry, but at what?  The context provides some help in identifying the cause of His anger.  Evidently as Jesus viewed the misery that death inflicts on humanity and the loved ones of those who die, He thought of its cause: sin.  Many of “the Jews” present had come from Jerusalem, where Jesus had encountered stubborn unbelief.  The sin of unbelief resulted in spiritual death, the source of eternal grief and mourning.  Probably Jesus felt angry because He was face to face with the consequences of sin, and particularly unbelief. (Thomas Constable)

But He did weep as well.

His weeping doubtless expressed outwardly the sorrow that contemplation of sin and its consequences produced in His heart.  Jesus’ “tears” are proof of His compassion for fallen humanity (cf. Luke 19:41).

He could not have been weeping over the loss of His friend Lazarus, since He was about to restore him to life.  Likewise it is unlikely that He was just weeping compassionately with Martha and Mary, since He was about to turn their grief into rejoicing.  Nevertheless empathy undoubtedly played some part in Jesus’ weeping.

In the resurrection of Lazarus we see the supreme power of Jesus Christ over death, the final stronghold of Satan.

This miracle illustrated Jesus’ ability to empower people with new life (cf. 14:6).  He had previously raised the widow of Nain’s son (Luke 7:15), and brought Jairus’ daughter (Matt. 9:25; Mark 5:42; Luke 8:55) back to life, but Lazarus had been dead four days!

Some note that Lazarus’ resurrection is similar to our regeneration, while needed to be loosed from the grave clothes approximates our sanctification.

The chapter ends with two responses to this astounding miracle–belief and unbelief.  It’s just not true that miracles definitely produce faith.

Proverbs 8 is a defense of wisdom. The sage returned to the figure of Wisdom that he used at the beginning of this part of Proverbs (1:20).

The argument of this section develops as follows. Wisdom would be every person’s guide (vv. 1-5; cf. Gal 5:18, 22-23).  She is morality’s partner (vv. 6-13), the key to success (vv. 14-21), the principle of creation (vv. 22-31), and the one essential necessity of life (vv. 32-36).  Chapter 8 contains the longest sustained personification in the Bible.

Though described as with God, wisdom is not asserted to be God.  Such a presentation is consistent with personification, a literary metaphor in which a thing or an abstraction is represented as a person. (Common examples of personification in our ordinary lives include Mr. Clean, Aunt Jemima, the Jolly Green Giant, etc.)  So “Lady Wisdom”  is not the female side of God, nor is she a feminine deity in her own right. Instead she praises God; she calls people to heed her teachings and so to find life.  Wisdom shows the character of God, and God will give wisdom to all who learn from the Proverbs.

Some believe that vv. 30-31 describes the co-creative work of the Father and the Son, delighting in the creation.  Although it represents what actually happened, it is best not to equate wisdom with the Son, because in v. 22 it was created.

Ephesians 1 begins with an amazing description of our spiritual blessings in Christ (1:1-14), followed by a prayer that our eyes might be opened to these benefits (1:15-23).

2nd and 3rd Missionary Journeys

Ephesus is in the center of the map, on the western coast (Aegean Sea) of Asia Minor.  Ephesus was a wealthy port city in the Roman province of Asia.  It was a center of learning and was near several key land routes.

Paul’s first visit to Ephesus was on his second missionary journey (Acts 18:18-21).  It was a short visit around 52 A.D.  On his third missionary journey he spent nearly three years in Ephesus (Acts 19), then later returned to say farewell to the elders of the church (Acts 20:17-38.  He had great fondness for the Ephesian church.

The apostle Paul wrote this letter to the churches in Ephesus and the surrounding region c. A.D.62 while imprisoned in Rome (Acts 28). During this time he also wrote Colossians and Philemon.  All three letters were sent with Tychicus and Onesimus.  He would later write 1 and 2 Timothy to Timothy, the pastor of the Ephesian church.  And John writes to them in Revelation 2:1-7.

Book Chart, Swindoll

Paul tells us that those “in Christ” (a key phrase) receive these spiritual blessings: being chosen (v. 4), being predestined to adoption (v. 5), redeemed and forgiven (v. 7), given an inheritance (v. 11), sealed by the Spirit (v. 13) and He is the pledge of our inheritance (v. 14).

Note both the presence of the Trinity–the Father (vv. 3-6), the Son (vv. 7-12) and the Spirit (vv. 13-14) as well as the repeated “to the praise of his glorious grace/to the praise of his glory” (vv. 6, 12, 14).

Ephesians and Colossians, as well as 2 Peter, all communicate the completeness of what we already have in Christ:

  • Ephesians 1:3, “who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places” (ESV)
  • Colossians 2:10, “you are complete in Him” (NKJV)
  • 2 Peter 1:3, “His divine power has given us everything we need for a godly life” (NIV)

Paul’s prayer in 1:15-23 reveals that we don’t need to ask for more, just ask that our blinders might come off in order to really see and experience all He has done for us.

What I Read in March 2019

Apologetics at the Cross: An Introduction to Christian Witness by Joshua D. Chatrow and Mark D. Allen is designed as a classroom textbook.

The first four chapters establish a foundation for apologetics at the cross by tracing the theme of apologetics through the Scriptures and then showing how it was used in Christian history.

The object of the book is to do apologetics differently.  Instead of being argumentative, be gentle; instead of coming in with all the answers, listen; instead of one approach, tailor it to the person.

How to Think: A Survival Guide for a World at Odds by Alan Jacobs

This book talks about how we think, and how we often think poorly and don’t often realize it.  It teaches us about thinking and how to think so as to rescue us from the divisiveness we see all around us today.

Othello

Is a story about jealousy and manipulation.  Iago, passed over for a promotion, first tries to set up Cassio for revenge, but also helps his friend Roderigo win back Desdemona.  So Iago manipulates through shrewd conversations to discredit Cassio and to make it look like Desdemona (Othello’s wife) has been unfaithful with Cassio.  As typical in Shakespeare, somebody dies.  Actually, almost everyone dies.  All because of jealousy, “the green-eyed monster.”

Gilead by Marilynne Robinson

I have to confess, I did not see what made this a Pulitzer Prize winning novel.  It is a story about fathers and sons and the impact of the Civil War.

Gay Girl, Good God by Jackie Hill Perry

This book describes Jackie’s same-sex attraction to girls and her struggle with giving that up.  It is a good book describing those struggles and how to please God with your sexual life.  It is also a good book describing the impact of the gospel and the struggles of sanctification.

Working the Angles by Eugene Peterson

Peterson identifies three practices which are missing from most pastor’s schedules but are vital for real pastoring–prayer, Bible reading and spiritual direction.

M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 20

Today’s readings are from Exodus 31, John 10, Proverbs 7 and Galatians 6.

Exodus 31 (31:1-11) begins by summarizing what God required for His people to approach Him: the tabernacle altars, furniture, regulations, and worship procedures; functions of the priests and their strict following of sacrifices and worship, including their holy garments, holy anointing with holy oil, and continual burning of holy incense; and the strict observance of the Sabbath by all Israelites.  God appointed two specific and specially-gifted men who would be responsible over “all [the] skillful men,” for interpreting Moses’ instructions about the tabernacle, as well as constructing it.  He also “filled” them with His “Spirit,” so that they would make choices consistent with His will (v. 3). (T. Constable)

Like Oholiab and Bezalel, we need to offer our talents to God.  Their work was artistic craftsmanship, not particularly “sacred,” yet they did it for God’s glory.

Yahweh also reinforces the Sabbath (31:12-18), reminding them that they had entered into a measure of rest.  Observance of the Sabbath was unique to Israel. It distinguished Israel from all other nations. So important was its observance that any Israelite, who failed to observe it (“whoever does any work on it”) died (v. 15). This “sign” was to continue “throughout all (your) generations” (v. 13), as long as God continued to work through Israel as His primary instrument (cf. Rom. 10:4; Heb. 9:10).

This chapter concludes with…

18 And he gave to Moses, when he had finished speaking with him on Mount Sinai, the two tablets of the testimony, tablets of stone, written with the finger of God.

Were the two tablets the two tables of the law, or two copies of the 10 words?  Being a treaty between Yahweh and Israel, two copies (of the 10) fits the normal procedures for suzerainty treaties–one record for each party.

John 10 is where Jesus teaches about the sheep and shepherd.  We are the sheep, Jesus is the true shepherd.  There are false shepherds who are really thieves.  But the sheep know the voice of their master.

10 12, Shepherds

David Guzik writes:

In the common sheepfolds of ancient times, the shepherd merely gave his distinctive call and his sheep came out from the others, following him out of the sheepfold.  Sheep are experts at discerning their shepherd’s voice.

During World War I, the story goes, some Turkish soldiers tried to steal a flock of sheep from a hillside near Jerusalem.  The shepherd, who had been sleeping, awoke to find his flock being driven off.  He couldn’t recapture them by force, so he called out to his flock with his distinctive call.  The sheep listened, and returned to their rightful owner.  The soldiers couldn’t stop the sheep from returning to their shepherd’s voice.

Adam Clarke described six marks of the true and legitimate minister of God in these first six verses of John 10:

· He has a proper entrance into the ministry.

· He sees the Holy Spirit open his way as a doorkeeper to God’s sheep.

· He sees that the sheep respond to his voice in teaching and leadership.

· He is well acquainted with his flock.

· He leads the flock and does not drive them or lord it over them.

· He goes before the sheep as an example.

Jesus is not only the shepherd, but the gate (vv. 7-10).

Sheepfold in Jordan Valley, Ferrell Jenkins

Jesus is encouraging them to listen to His voice rather than the voice of false teachers.  They are like Satan, come to “kill, steal and destroy” but Jesus comes to give “life to the full” (John 10:10).

Jesus identifies Himself as the “good shepherd.”  He, unlike a hireling, laid down His life for His sheep.  Jesus knows those who are His (v. 14) and seeks to bring others in (v. 16).  It is important to remember that Jesus laid down His life of His own initiative and had the power to raise it again (v. 17).

It doesn’t surprise us that Jehovah’s Witnesses deny that Jesus could take His own life up again.  Yet many others (such as Kenneth Copeland, Kenneth Hagin, Fred Price and others) teach that Jesus was a helpless victim in hell, saved only by the intervention of God the Father (David Guzik).

John 10:22-42 presents Jesus at the Feast of Dedication (also called Hanukkah, the Feast of Lights)

The present section of the fourth Gospel is strongly Christological and focuses on Jesus’ identity.  In this subdivision of the text, Jesus presented Himself as the Messiah (vv. 22-30) and as the Son of God (vv. 31-39). This resulted in the climax of hostility against Him.

Jerusalem at winter

Solomon’s Colonnade was a place used for public gatherings.  It is on the east side of the Temple grounds.

They accused Jesus of being demon possessed.  It began with a request for Jesus to clarify His Messianic identity.  But they had Jesus’ teachings and miracles (v. 25).  Failing to believe that proved they were not Jesus’ sheep.

True sheep are doubly secured in the strong hands of Jesus (v. 28) and the Father (v. 29).

Image result for John 10:28-29

Of course, this led to the charge of blasphemy (v. 33).

Thomas Constable explains…

Jesus’ statement affirms the unity, authority, and inerrancy of Scripture.  Jesus held a very high view of Scripture.  His point was that it was inconsistent for the Jews to claim the Old Testament as their authority (v. 34), and then to disregard something that it said because they did not agree with it.  It was inconsistent for them, specifically, to stone Jesus for claiming to be God and the “Son of God,” when the Old Testament spoke of humans as “gods” and as “God’s sons.”

Jesus had told them over and over again who He was.  The problem wasn’t that Jesus was unclear about who He was and where He came from.  The problem was that the religious leaders had hearts of unbelief that they wanted to blame on Jesus.

Jesus finally withdraws from Jerusalem because of the official rejection from the religious elite.

The event had symbolic significance that the evangelist probably intended. Jesus withdrew the opportunity for salvation from the people there because they refused to accept His gracious offer of salvation.  Evidently Jesus went from Jerusalem back to Bethany in Perea, on the east side of “the Jordan” River, where the Jewish rulers had no authority to pursue Him (cf. 1:28).

Jesus knows his time is drawing close.  So he returns to the place where it all started, the place where he was baptized and the Holy Spirit dove descended upon him.  And there he prepares himself for what is to come.

Proverbs 7 focuses again on the adulterous woman are her seductive traps.  Listen to instruction; that is vital.  Sometimes we learn best through stories, so Solomon paints a picture of a foolish young man falling headlong for an adulterous woman.  He neither looks for, nor takes, an escape path.  He is walking too close to the fire.

The adulterous woman is smooth and seductive (not always quiet) in her invitation.  She made him feel desired (v. 15), describes her love nest (vv. 16-17) and practically guarantees they will not get caught (vv. 18-20).  As we almost suspected, she succeeds (v. 21), but the promised pleasure is simply an illusion and he has painful consequences to show for it (vv. 22-27)

Although free from the law, we have responsibilities towards one another (Gal. 6:1).  We are to restore sinning brothers.  The Greek word for “restore” here is katartizo.  Elsewhere the Greek word, katartizo, refers to mending nets (Matt. 4:21; Mark 1:19) and setting a fractured or dislocated bone.  This may involve confrontation (cf. Matt. 18:15-17). However, the “spiritual” Christian is the one that should do this, namely, one whose life bears the fruit of the Spirit because he or she habitually walks by the Spirit (5:16, 25). The more spiritually mature he or she is, having walked by the Spirit for some time, the better (cf. 1 Cor. 2:15; Heb. 5:13-14).  This allows us to do this gently and circumspectly–watching out for similar sins in our own lives.

Regarding this care we give others, David Guzik explains…

There is no contradiction between bear one another’s burdens (in verse 2) and each one shall bear his own load (verse 5).  In the latter, Paul speaks of our final accountability before God.  In the former, he speaks of our need to care for others in the body of Christ.

There is also a difference in the wording Paul uses.   The word for load in verse 5 is a common term for a man’s backpack.   The word for burdens in verse 2 is a different word meaning “heavy burdens” — those that are more than a man should carry.   In the end, we will are all responsible for our own work, but we can help bear the burdens of others.

An important life principle is given in Galatians 6:7-9…

7 Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. 8 For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life. 9 And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up.

When you sow to the Spirit, don’t despair that you don’t see immediate results.  Keep going.  And when you sow to the flesh, don’t become arrogant and complacent when you don’t get punished immediately, your day will come.

We must sow to the Spirit day after day.  What is sown, is sown in secret, but it will be revealed.

I’m not sure who came up with them (possibly John Lawrence), but I’ve seen the 7 laws of the harvest in several places:

  • We Reap Only What Has Been Sown
  • We Reap the Same In Kind As We Sow
  • We Reap in a Different Season than We Sow
  • We Reap More Than We Sow
  • We Reap In Proportion to What We Sow
  • We Reap the Full Harvest Of the Good Only if We Persevere
  • We Can’t do Anything About Last Year’s Harvest, But We Can About This Year’s

Verse 14 is Paul’s desire, and should be ours, to boast in nothing but the cross.  In John Piper’s sermon, Boasting Only in the Cross, he reminds us not to waste our lives, recounting this story he told at Passion OneDay 2000.  Here is a shortened account:

Three weeks ago we got word at our church that Ruby Eliason and Laura Edwards had both been killed in Cameroon. Ruby was over eighty. Single all her life, she poured it out for one great thing: to make Jesus Christ known among the unreached, the poor, and the sick. Laura was a widow, a medical doctor, pushing eighty years old, and serving at Ruby’s side in Cameroon.

The brakes failed, the car went over the cliff, and they were both killed instantly.  And I asked my people:  Was that a tragedy?  Two lives, driven by one great vision, spent in unheralded service to the perishing poor for the glory of Jesus Christ — two decades after almost all their American counterparts have retired to throw their lives away on trifles in Florida or New Mexico.  No.  That is not a tragedy.  That is a glory.

I tell you what a tragedy is. I’ll read to you from Reader’s Digest (Feb. 2000, 98) what a tragedy is: “Bob and Penny . . . took early retirement from their jobs in the Northeast five years ago when he was 59 and she was 51.  Now they live in Punta Gorda, Florida, where they cruise on their 30-foot trawler, play softball and collect shells.”

The American Dream: come to the end of your life — your one and only life — and let the last great work before you give an account to your Creator be, “I collected shells.  See my shells.”  That is a tragedy.  And people today are spending billions of dollars to persuade you to embrace that tragic dream.  And I get forty minutes to plead with you: don’t buy it.

Don’t waste your life. It is so short and so precious.

While the tone if Paul throughout Galatians is somewhat stern, he ends by wishing them peace.

“After the storm and stress and intensity of the letter comes the peace of the benediction. Paul has argued and rebuked and cajoled but his last word is GRACE, for him the only word that really mattered.” (William Barclay)

Thomas Constable ends the book of Galatians with this chart distinguishing grace and law in the book of Galatians:

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN GRACE AND LAW

“Grace . . .

Law . . .

•         is based on faith (2:16). •         is based on works (2:16).
•         justifies sinful men (2:16, 17). •         is incapable of resulting in justification 2:16; 3:11).
•         begins and ends with Christ (2:20). •         makes Christ nothing (5:2-4).
•         is the way of the Spirit (3:2, 3, 14). •         is the way of the flesh (3:3).
•         is a ‘blessing’ (3:14). •         is a ‘curse’ (3:13).
•         is God’s desired end for His people (3:23-25). •         was intended to be only a means to an end (3:23-25).
•         results in intimacy with Christ (3:27). •         results in estrangement from Christ (5:4).
•         makes one a son of God and an heir of Christ (4:6, 7). •         keeps one a slave (4:7).
•         brings liberty (5:1). •         results in bondage (5:1).
•         depends on the power of the Holy Spirit (5:16-18, 22, 23). •         depends on human effort (5:19-21).
•         is motivated by love (5:13, 14). •         is motivated by pride (6:3, 13, 14).
•         centers on the cross of Christ (6:12-14). •         centered on circumcision (5:11; 6:12-15).”

M’Cheyne Bible Reading Plan, March 19

Today’s readings are from Exodus 30, John 9, Proverbs 6 and Galatians 5.

Exodus 30 gives specifications for the altar of incense and the laver.  The construction of the altar of incense occurs in vv. 1-10.  Jesus ever intercedes for us (Hebrews 7:24-25).  The atonement money is described in vv. 11-16.

Altar of Incense

The specifications for the laver is given in vv. 17-21.  Christ washes us through his blood (1 John 1:7, 9) and his word (Ephesians 5:26).

Brazen Laver

The Laver of Water

Moses also describes the anointing oil (30:22-33) and the incense (30:34-38).

John 9 is Jesus’ encounter with a man born blind.  The exact time of this miracle and Jesus’ resultant discourse is unclear.  Evidently these events transpired sometime between the Feast of Tabernacles (7:2, 10; September 10-17, A.D. 32.) and the Feast of Dedication (10:22-39; December 18, A.D. 32.).  It is the sixth of seven signs.

His disciples wanted to know whom to blame his blindness upon–himself or his parents.  That is one possible answer to tragedy in this world–that we do it to ourselves or someone else is responsible.  But Jesus answered…

3 Jesus answered, “It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be displayed in him.

Sometimes our tragedies are simply opportunities for God to display His glory, in this case by healing the man.  Jesus anointed the man’s eyes with saliva and told him to wash in the pool of Siloam.

The water for the pool of Siloam came through Hezekiah’s tunnel, a remarkable engineering feat built in Old Testament times.  “It was called Siloam, which, it was said, meant sent, because the water in it had been sent through the conduit into the city.” (Barclay)

“It was from the Siloam stream that was drawn the water which was poured over the great altar at the Feast of Tabernacles just past, which pouring out was regarded by the Rabbis (and is still) as typical of the pouring out of The Spirit in the ‘latter days’.” (Trench)

Pool of Siloam, Ferrell Jenkins

Pool of Siloam In Jerusalem - public domain map

Image result for pool of siloam

Not many people would appreciate having mud made with spit rubbed in their eyes!  Some would look at how Jesus did this miracle and object, saying that it was offensive, inadequate, or even harmful to rub mud made with spit in a man’s eyes.

In the same way, some feel that the gospel is offensive. It is true that it offends man’s pride and human wisdom, but it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. (1 Corinthians 1:21)

In the same way, some feel that the gospel is inadequate. But have all the psychiatric and political and social programs in the world done more good than the life-changing gospel of Jesus Christ?

In the same way, some feel that the gospel is harmful, that the free offer of grace in Jesus will cause people to sin that grace may abound. But the gospel changes our life for the good and the pure, not unto wickedness.

–David Guzik

Of course, the Pharisees object to this because–guess what–Jesus did it on the Sabbath.  Some of them struggled with the deeper issue–that Jesus could heal this man born blind, but others shrugged it off because he had violated the Sabbath.  The begin to investigate.  This man kept testifying that Jesus had completely healed him.  But ultimately, they would not “see” (believe the truth).

Opening the eyes of the blind was prophesied to be a work of the Messiah: The eyes of the blind shall be opened.  (Isaiah 35:5)

Jesus revealed Himself to the former blind man and he believed.  He concluded…

39 Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world, that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind.” 40 Some of the Pharisees near him heard these things, and said to him, “Are we also blind?” 41 Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no guilt; but now that you say, ‘We see,’ your guilt remains.

Paul tells us in 2 Corinthians 4

3 And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing. 4 In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

This chapter advances the revelation of Jesus’ true identity, which was one of John’s primary objectives in this Gospel.  It also shows that as the light of this revelation became clearer, so did the darkness—because some people prefer the darkness to the light (3:19).

One may say that this entire chapter paints a picture of how Jesus heals blind souls.

· We are all spiritually blind from birth.

· Jesus takes the initiative in healing us from blindness.

· Jesus does a work of creation in us, not reformation.

· In this work, we must be obedient to what Jesus commands.

· Jesus commands us to be washed in the water of baptism.

· We become a mystery to our former associates, not even seeming to be the same person.

· We display loyalty to Jesus when we are persecuted, boldly and plainly testifying of His work in our lives and confounding others.

· We pass from little knowledge to greater knowledge, and this brings us to greater worship and adoration.

David Guzik

Proverbs 6 starts by warning against signing surety for someone else’s loan.  Just don’t do it (6:1-5).  Then Solomon warns against laziness, observing the ant (6:6-11).  There are six things, no seven, that God hates (6:12-19).  Once again, there is a call to listen to instruction, in order to gain wisdom (6:20-23), especially protecting you from the charms of the adulterous woman (6:24-35).

In verses 27-29 we have a series of physical analogies designed to illustrate spiritual cause and effect. Adultery brings inescapable punishment. One may contain the fire (v. 27) at first, but others will discover it if it continues to burn. “His clothes” (v. 27) may imply outward reputation, namely, what others see, as often in Scripture.

Men and women who decide to flirt with adultery just once can become enmeshed in misery and unhappiness for themselves and their precious families. (Joseph B. Wirthlin)

In Galatians 5  Paul moves from doctrinal teaching to practical application.  Having ruled out the Mosaic Law as a regulatory standard for Christian behavior, Paul proceeded to explain how God does lead us.  He did this by first discussing two opposite extremes (legalism and license), and then the proper middle (or higher) road. The indwelling Holy Spirit now leads us, but we must be careful to follow His leading.

1 For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.

James Montgomery Boice has said:

“Before plunging into this third section of his letter, Paul interjects a verse that is at once a summary of all that has gone before and a transition to what follows.  It is, in fact, the key verse of the entire Epistle.  Because of the nature of the true gospel and of the work of Christ on his behalf, the believer is now to turn away from anything that smacks of legalism and instead rest in Christ’s triumphant work for him and live in the power of Christ’s Spirit. . . . The appeal is for an obstinate perseverance in freedom as the only proper response to an attempt to bring Christians once more under legalism.”

Likewise, John Piper has written:

This is the will of God for you: your freedom.  Uncompromising, unrelenting, indomitable freedom.  For this Christ died.  For this he rose.  For this he sent his Spirit.  There is nothing he wills with more intensity under the glory of his own name than this: your freedom.

David Guzik shares this clarifying story:

The great evangelist D. L. Moody illustrated this point by quoting an old former slave woman in the South following the Civil War.  Being a former slave, she was confused about her status and asked: Now is I free, or been I not?  When I go to my old master he says I ain’t free, and when I go to my own people they say I is, and I don’t know whether I’m free or not.  Some people told me that Abraham Lincoln signed a proclamation, but master says he didn’t; he didn’t have any right to.

Many Christians are confused on the same point.  Jesus Christ has given them an “Emancipation Proclamation,” but their “old master” tells them they are still slaves to a legal relationship with God.  They live in bondage because their “old master” has deceived them.

God did away with the Mosaic Law completely: the civil, the ceremonial, and the moral parts.  He terminated it as a code and has replaced it with a new code: “the Law of Christ” (Gal. 6:2).  Some commandments in the Law of Christ are the same as those in the Law of Moses (e.g., nine of the Ten Commandments, excluding the command to observe the Sabbath day).

Paul then began to attack the Judaizer’s promotion of circumcision (v. 2) and tells the Galatians that if they submitted to circumcision, then they would be obligated to keep the whole law.

When Paul says, in v. 4…

you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace.

He is not saying that a believer in Jesus Christ has lost their salvation, but rather, if you depend upon the law  to save you (in even the least bit) then you are not saved at all and you have removed yourself from the working of grace.

This is the exact opposite of what Paul says in Romans 5:1-2…

1 Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. 2 Through him we have also obtained access by faith into this grace in which we stand, 

When justified by faith (not “by the law,” Gal. 5:4), we have (1) peace with God and (2) access into grace “in which we stand.”  When we try to be justified by the law, we remove ourselves from grace, by definition.

As Tom Constable says…

The Galatians’ confidence in circumcision would reveal a confidence in their own ability to earn salvation by obeying the Law.  This legal approach to salvation would separate them from Christ, since what He did was provide salvation as a gift.  They would fall away from the grace method of salvation if they chose the law method.

What really matters is not circumcision, but “faith working through love” (5:6).  Real faith will result in love.

Bornkamm warns:

“We must guard against the misunderstanding current especially in Catholic theology (though Protestantism is far from exempt) that only faith made perfect in love leads to justification.  This represents a serious distortion of the relationship between faith, love, and justification.  In speaking of justification Paul never talks of faith and love, but only of faith as receiving.  Love is not therefore an additional prerequisite for receiving salvation, nor is it properly an essential trait of faith; on the contrary, faith animates the love in which it works.”

False teachers were hindering the Galatian believers in their “race.”

Zola Budd and Mary Decker ran close together in the pack of 1,000-meter runners in the 1984 Los Angeles, California, Olympic Games.  Unexpectedly, Zola Budd bumped into Mary Decker, and Mary went sprawling into the infield.  She was out of the race.  Just so, the false teachers in Galatia had interrupted the Galatian believers’ good progress toward their goal.

Some implied (v. 11) that Paul supported circumcision.  Paul’s point here was that if he was teaching that circumcision was necessary for salvation, the Judaizers would not have “persecuted” him.  If people need circumcision, they do not need the cross of Christ.  The legalists opposed Paul’s preaching of the Cross, because it pointed out that people are unable to please God themselves.

John Stott comments:

“‘Circumcision’ stands for a religion of human achievement, of what man can do by his own good works; ‘Christ’ stands for a religion of divine achievement, of what God has done through the finished work of Christ.  ‘Circumcision” means law, works, and bondage; ‘Christ’ means grace, faith and freedom.  Every person must choose.”

David Guzik notes:

Legalism can’t handle the offense of the cross.   The whole point of Jesus dying on the cross was to say, “You can’t save yourself.  I must die in your place or you have absolutely no hope at all.”  When we trust in legalism, we believe that we can, at least in part, save ourselves.  This takes away the offense of the cross, which should always offend the nature of fallen man.  In this sense, the offense of the cross is really the glory of the cross, and legalism takes this glory away.

Paul then argues against license in vv. 13-25.  Instead of using our liberty to fulfill our own selfish desires, we should use it to love others (vv. 13-15), which fulfills the law–it grows out of the command to love God with all that we are, and expresses what the law means in the second table.

We should walk in the Spirit and not fulfill the desires of our flesh (vv. 16-18).  Realize that the flesh, whether doing good or doing bad, is opposed to the Spirit.  Even righteousness done in the flesh is not what God desires.  There is a constant battle between flesh and spirit.  We can win only by being filled with God’s Holy Spirit.

Paul gives examples of what it means to walk in the flesh (doing bad) in vv. 19-21 and then examples of what it looks like to walk in the Spirit (vv. 22-23).  Thus, the way to live between the poles of legalism and license is to walk by the Spirit (vv. 24-26).

Redeeming Love (Hosea 3)

Note:  this is the transcript (with additions) for my radio broadcasts on the weekend of March 30-31.  You can listen on KENA and KAWX.

Throughout chapter 2, Yahweh has been trying to get Israel to repent and return to Him.  Because of her stubborn pursuit of other lovers—both false gods and national allies—Yahweh would bring judgment upon Israel—exiling them from their land and turning it into a wilderness.

We noticed how many times Yahweh says “I will” in chapter 2.  Ultimately, there is nothing in Israel, just as there is nothing in us, which moves us to God, but it is His own initiative and love which makes it possible for us to turn to Him.

At the end of chapter 2 we see Yahweh wooing, then betrothing, then entering into the marriage covenant with Israel again.  This will occur “in that day,” Yahweh says, a future time when Israel will again be God’s bride.

But for now, in Hosea 3, we return to the present reality.  Israel was still an adulterous nation; Gomer was still an adulterous wife.  To illustrate God’s intention to love Israel back into a marriage relationship with Him, He calls Hosea to “go again” to love and redeem his wife.  Let me read Hosea 3.  It’s just five verses long.

1 And the LORD said to me, “Go again, love a woman who is loved by another man and is an adulteress, even as the LORD loves the children of Israel, though they turn to other gods and love cakes of raisins.” 2 So I bought her for fifteen shekels of silver and a homer and a lethech of barley. 3 And I said to her, “You must dwell as mine for many days.  You shall not play the whore, or belong to another man; so will I also be to you.” 4 For the children of Israel shall dwell many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or pillar, without ephod or household gods. 5 Afterward the children of Israel shall return and seek the LORD their God, and David their king, and they shall come in fear to the LORD and to his goodness in the latter days.

This chapter is a fitting conclusion to the pains Yahweh takes in chapter 2 to restore Israel and is a fitting prelude to the impassioned chapters which follow, where Yahweh is still reaching out to Israel.

Here Yahweh makes known His plan to redeem wayward Israel through the reunited marriage of Hosea and Gomer.  Although this chapter is short, its prophecies survey Israel’s past (in v. 1), her present (vv. 2-4) and her future (in v. 5).

Hosea could have legitimately divorced his wife and forgotten all about her.  Deuteronomy 24:1 and Matthew 19:7-8 permit divorce when adultery breaks the marriage union, but it by no means commands it.

Just as the prophet Hosea had been commissioned to share, with God, the pain of betrayal by a faithless bride, so he is now commissioned to participate with God in the experience of bringing redemption to that faithless bride.

Derek Kidner points out…

“It would have been impressive enough had Hosea found that in spite of everything he still loved his truant wife, and had then perceived that God’s love must be like that too.  But in fact it was the other way around.  It was God’s love that rekindled Hosea’s when the Lord said, ‘Go again, love her,’ and gave him the pattern to reproduce” (Hosea, p. 40).

An appropriate emphasis on the phrase, “even as the Lord loves the people of Israel” (v. 1) suggests that Hosea’s redemptive action originates from God’s exemplary love.  Not only do we love Him because He first loved us; we also love others as we do because he first loved us.  God’s love begets love in us.

The love of God is not “natural,”; nor is human love.  It is unreasonable.

It is obvious that, although unnamed, this is Gomer, the woman Hosea had been called to marry back in chapter 1.  The fact that she is unnamed leads to this conclusion, as does the word “again” and the fact that she is called “an adulteress.”  The only reason Hosea would be called to “show love” to an adulteress would be is she had been his wife.

So why does she go unnamed?  Perhaps to suggest that, like Hosea, she had lost her identity.  Just as Israel was no longer “my people,” so Gomer had lost her identity.  By analogy, adultery never enhances a person’s identity, but destroys it.

While there is discussion over whether the adverb “again” should go with “said” or “love” or possibly both, it is clear that love had been there in the beginning and it was being rekindled here.  As Fleming James says, “There is always an ‘again’ with love.”

There is no glossing over the unpleasant truth.  The “again” in God’s command faced the fact that old wounds would have to be reopened and that what had happened in the past might happen yet again.  Her adultery was still in progress, just as God demonstrated His love for us in that “while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”  While we are in the very act of sinning, God acts in love.

The love asked of Hosea would be heroic, but still only a small glimpse of the magnitude of God’s love.

Gomer and Israel had both forfeited love because of their adulteries, but Hosea is called to love Gomer again, just as Yahweh intended to love Israel again.

Few passages tell us more about the love of God than this.  It is constant in all circumstances, present even while people (probably both Israel and Judah are intended; cf. 1:6-7, 11) are enmeshed in their idolatries (4:12, 19; 5:3-4 for the expressions of the degree to which Israel’s perversion held her captive); (2) it contrasts utterly with the triviality of human affections, especially when these affections are diverted to unworthy objects—while Yahweh is loving the Israelites, what are they loving?  Raisin cakes! (3) it can be illustrated through human love when that human love has grasped something of the power and pathos of the divine—the command to Hosea assumes a corresponded between the divine and the human; what Hosea has learned about the forgiving, restoring love of Yahweh…he is to teach others by his love for an adulteress; (4) it is a commitment and action (v. 2), commanded with a divine imperative; and (5) it is strong as well as tender and has the courage and integrity to exercise discipline when that is necessary (vv. 3-4).

Four times in verse 1 the word “love” is used.  Here we see the range of meaning that it occupies in our English language¨(1) it can mean “to gain pleasure from”—as did Gomer’s paramour from her company (3:1) and Israel from her “raisin cakes” (3:1); (2) it can describe a misguided relationship like Israel’s with the Baals (2:7, 12, 15; 9:10) or with Assyria to whom she paid tribute as a lover’s hire (8:9); (3) it can connote loyal and costly love like that of Hosea’s which God commanded for Gomer, despite her infidelity (3:1) and (4) it can illuminate the many facets of Yahweh’s commitment to Israel from the exodus call to his people (11:1), through guidance, training and care he offered in their youth (11:4), and the forbearance he showed in the midst of her infidelity (3:1) to the forgiveness that turns aside divine anger and heals their inconstancy (14:4).  The divine imperative that commands true love is a lesson never lost on those who truly know their God (1 John 4:8).

So we can see in this chapter a love that controls (v. 1), a love that redeems (v. 2), a love that disciplines (v. 3) and a love that triumphs (vv. 4-5).

David Garland points out that it is noteworthy that Hosea is commanded to “love.”  It goes against the modern notion that love is a feeling which cannot be commanded at will.  However, the Scriptures speak of a kind of love that is an act of the will, a decision that is made to act a certain way towards another.  Yahweh didn’t tell Hosea to “fall in love” with Gomer, but to “love” her, to do what is best for her, no matter how unworthy, even at great personal cost.

It would have been very difficult for Hosea to “fall in love” with Gomer again.  But he could decide to love her and follow through with loving kindness.

This, by the way, is why “I’m not in love anymore” is no excuse for getting a divorce.  The fact is, we can choose to love and choose to commit ourselves to loving actions.  We can act our way into feeling.

It is clear that Gomer (and Israel) was an adulteress, one who had broken the marriage covenant by engaging sexually with another man.

That there was no change in her behavior, and nothing in her to love, is brought out in the fact that she still “turn[s] to other gods and love[s] cakes of raisins” (3:1c).  What are these raisin cakes?  It seems almost comical to mention them.  Indeed, they seem such trivial things to love.  But then, don’t we love things that are really quite trivial, so unimportant in the grand scheme of things?

It likely has nothing to do with their choice in desserts, but in their choice of gods.  They were likely used in the pagan worship rituals of Hosea’s day (Jer. 7:18; 44:19).

Screwtape, as we may suppose, would have hailed this as an unusually satisfying victory, even if he had had to throw in the whole world as bait (cf. Mark 8:36).  He told Wormwood, “an ever increasing craving for an ever diminishing pleasure is the formula.  It is more certain; and it’s better style.  To get the man’s soul and give him nothing in return—that is what really gladdens our Father’s heart.” (C. S. Lewis, The Screwtape Letters, IX)

What trivialities pull us back from full on commitment to God?

Hosea’s response in v. 2 illustrates both how costly love can be and how degraded Gomer’s condition had become.

Genuine love leads to action, and so Hosea “bought” Gomer.  Apparently she had been sold into slavery or sold herself into slavery, or possibly just into prostitution.  That was quite a fall from being a wife with family.

Genuine love is also a costly action.

Hosea bought her for 15 shekels of silver, which was about half the price for a dead slave (Exodus 21:32)!  Selling the barley probably made up the other half.  Poor Gomer, she was now not worth as much as a dead slave!

The fact that he had to sell his barley, estimated at around 300 liters, suggests that 15 shekels was not enough.  We don’t know for sure, but if Hosea had come into town to buy and sell, it is possible that he gave everything away to purchase Gomer back.

Vernon McGee reminds us, “Gomer wasn’t worth it, and we are not worth the redemption price which was paid for us. . . . (1 Pet. 1:18-19)

18 knowing that you were ransomed from the futile ways inherited from your forefathers, not with perishable things such as silver or gold,19 but with the precious blood of Christ, like that of a lamb without blemish or spot.

In paying the redemption price for Gomer, Hosea demonstrated the redeeming, reconciling nature of godly love.

Hosea was ready and willing to do whatever was necessary—to pay any price, to overcome any obstacle—to reestablish the former relationship.

The ultimate reestablishment of the former relationship, however, was not to be immediate, as may first appear to be the case.  The hurt had been too deep, the offense too serious.  Though in love with Gomer—perhaps all the while—he probably wanted sufficient time to elapse to encourage the true return of her affection and loyalty to him.

Therefore, he shut her away from all who might tempt her (3:3), while he himself refused to rush the resumption of their relationship.  Time would be allowed for the dissipation of old infatuations and the rekindling of dissipated or dormant love.  In due time normal relations would be resumed, but with caution and after assurance.

With Gomer isolated from all temptations to revert to a life of harlotry, Hosea was permitted to devote all his efforts to wooing back his bride (2:14).  The results of his efforts are not stated, but one can confidently speculate that at the end of that period of isolation Gomer responded to her husband’s love.

Israel can also be assured that during this time Yahweh will enter into no covenantal relationship with any other nation other than Israel.

I don’t think it is pressing the situation too far to identify this time period prophetically as the church age, when God is wooing Israel by making her jealous of Gentiles enjoying a relationship with God, as we read in Romans 11.

The final two verses of Hosea 3 point to the future restoration of Israel, to Yahweh and to one another.

4 For the children of Israel shall dwell many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or pillar, without ephod or household gods. 5 Afterward the children of Israel shall return and seek the LORD their God, and David their king, and they shall come in fear to the LORD and to his goodness in the latter days.

Those “many days” would be throughout the present church age and the tribulation period, to the time when Christ returns and establishes His kingdom, sitting upon the throne of David in Jersualem.

Kidner says…

“What is striking about this prophecy is first that it threatens the very pillars of life as Israel knew it, and then that it interprets the withdrawal of these cherished things–good, bad and indifferent alike–as ultimate gain.”

Let that sink in for a moment.  God can take things away from us.  He gives and takes away.  But how often do we interpret Him taking something away as “ultimate gain.”

Listen to the words of Martha Snell Nickerson’s poem Treasures:

One by one He took them from me,
All the things I valued most,
Until I was empty-handed;
Every glittering toy was lost.

And I walked earth’s highways, grieving.
In my rags and poverty.
Till I heard His voice inviting,
“Lift your empty hands to Me!”

So I held my hands toward heaven,
And He filled them with a store
Of His own transcendent riches,
Till they could contain no more.

And at last I comprehended
With my stupid mind and dull,
That God COULD not pour His riches
Into hands already full!

Until the glory days here predicted, Israel would be without king or prince.  This effectively shows that they will not be a nation, since they have no political or military leaders.

Israel will also be without sacrifice or pillar.  The destruction of the temple, in both 586 B.C. and 70 A.D. caused Israel’s religious infrastructure to fall apart.

And Israel will be without ephod or household gods (lit. teraphim).  In other words, there would be no guidance from God.

Image result for teraphim

Teraphim

Any of the above “gifts” can be either good or bad., but more especially the “pillar” and “household gods” (lit. teraphim) are almost always bad, leading Israel astray.

Again, it shows that Israel, like Gomer, will be shut off from those things which aided them in the worship of false gods.  When her probation ends, idolatry will never return, but a purified monarchy and true worship will return (Ezekiel 37:24; Malachi 3:3).

But at the end of that time, Israel “shall return and seek the LORD their God.”  Like the prodigal, she will return in fear, but be received in love.  Yahweh’s purpose in redeeming Israel was not to exact revenge, but to restore to a place of love and honor.

How will this return occur?  Is it found in the hearts of the people, or does it come because God gives them new hearts (Ezekiel 36:24-31)?  More likely the latter.

The prophecy that they would seek “David their king” is clearly Messianic.  The phrase does not mean that current Israel would again submit to the Davidic monarchy and so undo Jeroboam’s rebellion.  Had that been the point, one would expect the text to say that they would return “to the house of David.”

Instead, we see “David the King” set alongside Yahweh as the one to whom Israel will return in godly fear.  It is not literally David, but the Messianic king, Jesus Christ, who will establish His kingdom in Jerusalem for the good of Israel.

So Robert Chisholm explains:

“The reference to ‘David their king’ should not be understood in an overly literalistic manner.  The prophets view the ideal Davidic ruler of the future as the second coming of David (see Isa. 11:1-10; Mic. 5:2) and even call him ‘David’ on occasion (see Jer. 30:9; Ezek. 34:23-24; 37:24-25).  This ‘David’ carries out royal functions that cannot be distinguished from those assigned to the messianic king.

Other texts make it clear that this ‘David’ is actually a descendant of David (see Jer. 23:5-6; 33:15-16) who comes in his ancestor’s spirit and power, much like John the Baptist came in the spirit and power of Elijah and thus fulfilled the prophecy of Malachi 4:5 (see Matt. 11:10-14; 17:11-12; Mark 1:2-4; Luke 1:17, 76; 7:27).”

The mention of David their king conveys a number of thoughts in the context of Hosea: (1) the reunion of the two kingdoms under one head (cf. 1:11); (2) the reversal of Israel’s pattern of dynastic instability (7:3-7; 8:4; 10:3); (3) the rejection of foreign alliances which served as a buffer against their own political weakness (7:8-9, 11, 16); and (4) the covenantal continuity promised to David by Yahweh and violated by Jeroboam I and all his successors (cf. on 8:4).  Like Amos (9:11) and the great prophets who followed him (Micah 5:2; Isaiah 11:1-5; Jeremiah 23:5-6; Ezekiel 37:24-28; Zechariah 12:7), Hosea connected Yahweh’s future victory to the renascence of Davidic rule.  For Hosea, the return to Yahweh carried with it the reveal of all that Jeroboam’s splitting of the kingdom had wrought.  The spiritual return and the national reunion were of a piece–a reminder that the Old Testament sees Israel as a flesh and blood entity whose loaylty to Yahweh is lived not in an otherworldly realm but in the real economics, politics and geography of history. (David Hubbard, Hosea, p. 103).

The many centuries of suffering experienced by the people of Israel throughout the world will be culminated in the Great Tribulation, the event that will bring the Lord out of heaven to save His people Israel (see Zechariah 14; Revelation 6-19).  Israel’s return to God in the last days will truly be a return to His goodness, that special place of blessing, where they will join in all the privileges of Christ’s millennial reign (see Isaiah 52:7; Jeremiah 33:9; Zechariah 9:17).

Warren Wiersbe summarizes chapters 1-3

“God is gracious, and no matter what ‘name’ our birth has given to us, He can change it and give us a new beginning.  Even the ‘valley of trouble’ can become a ‘door of hope.’

“God is holy and He must deal with sin.  The essence of idolatry is enjoying the gifts but not honoring the Giver.  To live for the world is to break God’s heart and commit ‘spiritual adultery.’

“God is love and promises to forgive and restore all who repent and return to Him.  He promises to bless all who trust him [sic Him].”

This remains the continuing hope of man and the abiding message of the Hosea-Gomer experience: love, conceived in the heart of God and expressed through redemption, triumphs over judgment.

If you want to read a moving story related to Hosea and Gomer, this is a book Becky and I read about 20 years ago.