Two of Our Most Dangerous Idols, part 1 (Hebrews 13:4-6)

Idols, throughout the Bible they were made of stone, metal or wood or nature itself—sun, moon, rain, etc.–, but they were all used in an effort to bring some sort of blessings upon the one who sacrificed to the idol.  But on a deeper level, and one which is still in operation today, is that idolatry is “anything that we come to rely on for some blessing, or help, or guidance in the place of a wholehearted reliance on the true and living God” (John Piper)

If we come to crave, love, depend upon, and trust for a blessing people’s praise to enhance our self-exaltation, or money, or power, or sex, or family, or productivity, or anything else besides God himself for the greatest blessing, help, guidance, and satisfaction, then in essence we are doing what idolatry has always done.  Thus, the Apostle John concludes his first epistle with this clarion call, “Little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21).

If verses 1-3 were looking at how we look out for others in love, here in vv. 4-6 we are encouraged to look out for ourselves.  We must guard our own hearts in order to pursue genuine love for God and true holiness.  So our author chooses to focus in on what are likely the two most common idols that human beings struggle with: sex and money.

Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” So we can confidently say, “The Lord is my helper; I will not fear; what can man do to me?”

These directives summon Christians to seek satisfaction of their physical needs and desires through submitting to God’s will and trusting in God’s presence. Sex and money are perennial human issues, and with both the author orients our hearts toward God, who designed our sexual drives to be fulfilled in marriage and who jealously woos our anxious hearts away from an adulterous affair with silver. In doing so, God makes good his promise never to leave us (a promise that silver cannot keep: Prov. 23:4-5; Luke 12:16-21).

He starts with sex: “Let marriage be held in honor among all…”

Marriage was under attack in the first century, either through asceticism or libertinism.  Ascetics considered “virginity as necessary to Christian perfection” (Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977), p. 556).  This later developed in the second century into the Montanist movement, which later spawned celibate monasticism. To such, those who choose marriage choose inferior spirituality. 

We know that this was an issue even within the New Testament era because Paul in 1 Corinthians 7 addresses some in the church at Corinth who believed that sexual relations in marriage were spiritually defiling and that husbands and wives, though married, should refrain from all sexual contact with each other.  Paul sternly rebukes them for this.  Then again in 1 Timothy 4 Paul issues this warning:

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer” (1 Timothy 4:1-5)

But the greatest assault on marriage’s honor came from the libertines who saw marriage as irrelevant as they pursued unbridled sexual fulfillment.  In fact, it was very common for Roman men to have a wife to sire his children and a number of women on the side, including slaves, to fulfill his sexual desires.  There was no expectation in that society that men would be sexually faithful to their wives. 

So Christians were already distinctive in the way they viewed sex and marriage.  The second-century Christian writer Tertullian, for example, said, “One in mind and soul, we do not hesitate to share our earthly goods with one another.  All things are common among us but our wives (Apologetics, p. 39, italics are mine)

Wouldn’t you agree that marriage is under attack in our world today?  People no longer honor marriage like we used to.  Instead, people ridicule it, argue against it, make fun of it, and hide from it.  Divorce, adultery, cohabitation, homosexuality and transgenderism all dishonor the biblical idea of marriage.  Today radical secular wisdom claims that marriage impedes self-actualization—an unforgivable sin in the eyes of modern men and women.  We live in the wake of the “free sex” movement of the 1960s which allows any and every sexual expression.

So our author addresses both groups.  To the one he says: “Marriage is good.  Marriage is not to be forbidden or avoided.  Hold marriage in high regard.  Honor it as the divine gift from our heavenly Father.”  To the other group he says: “And when you get married, be faithful to your spouse.  Don’t defile your marriage covenant or the marriage bed by committing sexual immorality or adultery.”

So what is marriage?  What does the Bible say?  Well, first of all, marriage is God’s good idea.  We find it in Genesis 2.  Genesis proclaims, after God gave Eve to Adam, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24).   This is God’s instruction.  It is God’s good idea.

Ray Ortlund reminds us: “What every married couple needs to know is that their marriage is a remnant of Eden. This is why every marriage is worth working at, worth fighting for. A marriage filled with hope in God is nothing less than an afterglow of the garden of Eden, radiant with hope until perfection is finally restored.”

Sam Storms gives this definition of marriage: I would define marriage as the enjoyment of spiritual and physical unity between one man and one woman based on a life-long, covenant commitment, the ultimate aim of which is to display the covenant relationship between Jesus Christ and his Bride, the Church.

Marriage, from the beginning, was between one man and one woman and it was to be a permanent, heterosexual relationship.  As Jesus later said, “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Matthew 19:6).

There are no other acceptable alternatives in the Bible.  God’s clear and unmistakable revealed will is that marriage is a life-long covenant between one man and one woman that illustrates or displays the covenant love between Christ and his Church.  Same-sex marriage does not exist as far as the Bible is concerned.  It is not what God calls “marriage.”

Our author says that marriage should be “held in honor.”  “Held in honor” reflects the adjective timios (Acts 5:34), which can often mean “precious” in the sense of having great value, such as “precious stones” (1 Kings 10:2, 10-11; 1 Cor. 3:12).  Our author focuses, therefore, on the priceless gem of sexual intimacy, to be protected by the covenant of exclusive fidelity between one man and one woman. 

Charles Swindoll notices that our author places the adjective “honored” at the front of the sentence in a position of emphasis.  In contrast to the triad of asceticism, immorality, and indifference, Christian marriage should be honored.  (Charles R. Swindoll, Swindoll’s Living Insights: Hebrews, 215)

Our author here in Hebrews is telling us that marriage is not simply an institution or arrangement or even merely a covenant.  It is not to be looked at as a negative thing, an imprisonment.  Rather, it is something of immeasurable value: it is precious in the sight of God and we must treat it accordingly.  Treasure it.  Respect it.  Esteem it.  Prize it.  And therefore protect it.

Honoring marriage is so vitally important partly because it is a picture of something bigger and greater and more mysterious.  The Holy Spirit honors it in Ephesians 5 by using it to portray the relationship between Christ and his church (Ephesians 5:23–32).  So if you dishonor marriage, you dishonor God’s picture of redemptive love.  That’s a big deal!

John Piper writes:

What this implies is that when God engaged to create man and woman and to ordain the union of marriage, he didn’t roll the dice or draw straws or flip a coin as to how they might be related to each other.  He patterned marriage very purposefully after the relationship between his Son and the church, which he had planned from all eternity…Those of us who are married need to ponder again and again how mysterious and wonderful it is that God grants us in marriage the privilege to image forth stupendous divine realities infinitely bigger and greater than ourselves. (https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/the-mystery-of-marriage).

Two sins seem to be represented here, “sexual immorality” and “adultery.”  The difference, basically, is whether one is married or not.  Sexual immorality, from the Greek πόρνους, from which we get our word pornography, stands for any kind of sex outside of marriage.  This would include premarital sex, pornography, masturbation, polyamory and homosexuality.  It is the broad sweeping term.  In contrast, adultery (μοιχοὺς), can only be committed by a married person who is being unfaithful to their marriage vows and engaging in sex with someone other than their spouse.

F. F. Bruce confirms:  “Fornication and adultery are not synonymous in the New Testament: adultery implies unfaithfulness by either party to the marriage vow, while the word translated ‘fornication’ covers a wide range of sexual irregularities.”

Unfortunately, sexual immorality and adultery are not confined to unbelievers in the world around us.  Far too many pastors, not to mention other Christians, have fallen into sexual sins lately.  That’s why this counsel from our author is so needed today!

Christopher Ash provides six reasons to take adultery very seriously in his book Marriage for God.  First, adultery is turning away from a promise made to the person we married.  At the wedding we turned towards them and made promises, but adultery is turning away from them and breaking those promises. 

Second, adultery leads the adulterer from security to chaos.  Because the adulterer has turned away, he or she enters into a life of torn loyalties.  “Once the promise is broken, the barrier is breached, the secure wall of marriage is torn down, all hell breaks loose.  And an adulterer finds he or she has not after all exchanged one secure place (his marriage) for another secure place (the new home with the new partner).  That is the illusion, but the reality is much different.

Third, adultery is secretive and dishonest.  Adultery is inherently secretive, inherently dishonest.  It has to be because no one wants to trumpet that they are breaking a promise.  Adultery loves the darkness and flees the light and for as long as it can it tries to remain a secret.  “Whereas news of a marriage is broadcast by joyful announcement and invitations, news of adultery leaks out by rumor and under pressure.”  Ouch.  That alone should tell us what is at the heart of adultery, for sin loves to remain in the darkness while righteousness loves the light.

Fourth, adultery destroys the adulterer.  Adultery does no favors to the adulterer.  To the contrary, it undermines and erodes character and integrity.  “Like all secret sin, it eats away like some noxious chemical at the integrity of the one who commits it.  The moment any of us drive a wedge between what we say we are publicly and what we actually are privately, we injure ourselves at the deepest possible level.”

Fifth, adultery damages society.  We can widen the scope from the individual to the society around him and see that the damage continues there, too.  Adultery does harm to the very fabric of society.  “Each act of adultery is like a wrecker’s ball taking a swing at the secure walls of the social fabric of society. It stirs up hatred and enmity.  It encourages a culture which reckons marriage boundaries needn’t really be quite so rigid.”  We love to think our sins are our own, that they concern only us.  But no, our sin goes far beyond ourselves and impacts others, tragically so.

And that leads us to the sixth serious consequence of adultery, adultery hurts children. Adultery does grievous harm to an innocent party—children.  “Because children are right in the thick of it, in the intimacy of the family home broken by cheating on promises, darkened by secrecy and lies, riven with conflict and hatreds.”  Children thrive when there is structure, when there is stability, when there is peace and order.  Children are harmed when adultery brings chaos and conflict and disunity.  Children are innocent parties who are terribly harmed when adultery separates their parents.

But there is an even greater consequence that our text forewarns: God’s judgment.  The reason marriage should “be held in honor among all” “the marriage bed be undefiled” is because “God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.”

God’s judgment will follow the sexually impure (cf. 12:29).  Under the Old Covenant the Israelites were to punish fornicators and adulterers, but under the New Covenant, God Himselfhas promised to do it. 

“It is because of immorality and impurity, says Paul, that ‘the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience’ (Eph. 5:5f; cf. Rom. 1:26ff.), cutting them off from the divine blessing, as our author has warned by citing the example of Esau (12:16f.).  Similarly, again, Paul admonishes the members of the Thessalonian church: ‘This is the will of God, your sanctification, that you abstain from sexual immorality…because the Lord is an avenger of all these things, as we solemnly forewarned you.  For God has not called us for uncleanness, but in holiness’ (1 Thess. 4:4-7)” (Philip Edgecombe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, pp. 566-567).

Proverbs tells us “Can a man carry fire next to his chest and his clothes not be burned? Or can one walk on hot coals and his feet not be scorched?  So is he who goes in to his neighbor’s wife; none who touches her will go unpunished” (Proverbs 6:27-29) and “He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who does it destroys himself” (Proverbs 6:32).

“How does God judge fornicators and adulterers?  Sometimes they are judged in their own bodies (Rom. 1:24-27) as God “gives them over” to their idolatrous desires.  Certainly they will be judged at the final judgment (Rev. 21:8; 22:15).  Believers who commit these sins certainly may be forgiven, but they will lose rewards in heaven (Eph. 5:5ff).  David was forgiven, but he suffered the consequences of his adultery for years to come; and he suffered in the hardest way: through his own children” (Warren Wiersbe, The Wiersbe Bible Commentary: New Testament, p. 842).

When our author is saying, “Let marriage be held in honor among all…” he is not saying that marriage IS held in honor by all, but is exhorting all of them to hold marriage in high honor.  As Christians we should celebrate biblical marriage, we should celebrate anniversaries.  Holding marriage in honor also means that we reject any marriage that does not follow the biblical example.  We don’t have to be ugly about it, but we don’t honor marriage as God presented it by countenancing any other type of marriage pattern.  Marriage is God’s good gift.  He ordained it and defines it.

Indispensable, of course, to the honor of marriage is purity, and thus the text adds, “and let the marriage bed be undefiled” (v. 4b).  “Bed” is used here as a euphemism for sexual intercourse, and in demanding that it be kept “undefiled” “our author is referring in sacrificial terms to married chastity” (Hugh Montefiore, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1964), p. 240).  The marriage “bed” is an altar, so to speak where a pure offering of a couple’s lives is made to each other and to God.

The Bible celebrates sex between one man and one woman united in marriage, such as we see in that book that was off-limits to young Jewish men, the Song of Solomon.  There we see passionate sex which God applauds between a man and woman who were now married.  Before that, he says three times, “Do not arouse or awaken love until it pleases,” or, as paraphrased by Eugene Peterson in The Message, “Don’t excite love, don’t stir it up, until the time is ripe — and you’re ready.”  And that time is within the boundaries of a marriage between one man and one woman.  Marriage, as an ordinance and gift from God, is neither defiling nor to be defiled.

Sex between a man and woman who have committed themselves to one another through marriage is precious and sacred and life-giving.  Paul says in 1 Corinthians 7:6-7 that sexual desire is not, in itself, sin.  However, if someone has those desires, the answer is to get married.  Marriage is the place to legitimately satisfy our sexual desires.

This was radical stuff in the pagan context—and Christians lived it out.  When Pliny was sent by the Roman Emperor Trajan to govern the province of Bithynia and looked for charges against the Christians, he had to report back that on the Lord’s Day, “They bound themselves by oath, not for any criminal end, but to avoid theft or adultery, never to break their word. . . .” (William Barclay, The Letter to the Hebrews (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1957), p. 221).  Christian sexual morality was unique in the pagan world and a source of wonder. 

Today it is more a subject of ridicule.  And it has become increasingly so today in a world that considers adultery irrelevant, purity abnormal, and sex a “right” (however and with whomever one may get it) and that has invented the egregious term “recreational sex.”

Sex is not just for reproduction, nor is it merely for pleasure, although both of those are good results.  Sex is primarily to build together a one-flesh intimacy, a deepening knowledge and appreciation of one another as we meet one another’s sexual needs.

Talk-show host Dennis Prager wrote about an ad he read for a sex therapist in Los Angeles: “If you’re not completely satisfied with your sex life, give us a call.”  The more he thought about it, the more he was struck by the brilliance on the ad, all because of two words: “completely satisfied.”  Who is ever completely satisfied with anything?

Imagine these ads:

If you’re not completely satisfied with your spouse, give us a call.

If you’re not completely satisfied with your body, give us a call.

If you’re not completely satisfied with your church, give us a call.

We are completely satisfied with nothing.

Why are we completely satisfied by nothing on earth?  Maybe it’s because we are too demanding.  Maybe the answer is to bank our desires, settle for what life gives, and try to keep ourselves from wanting.

Or maybe it’s because we were made for something earth does not have to offer and we’re playing life’s game in a way it wasn’t designed to be played.  (John Ortberg, When the Game is Over It All Goes Back in the Box, 193).  Maybe we were made for something greater, something more satisfying.  As C. S. Lewis said in his wonderful book Mere Christianity, ““If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only logical explanation is that I was made for another world.”  We were made to find our deepest desires and needs met in God Himself, not in anything He has created, even our spouses.

Can sex become an idol?  Sure it can!

So John Piper reminds us…

It is astonishing that in this Psalm (51), David never prays directly about sex.  His corruption all started with sex, leading to deceit, leading to murder…or did it?   I don’t think so.  Why isn’t he crying out for sexual restraint?  Why isn’t he praying for men to hold him accountable?   Why isn’t he praying for protected eyes and lust-free thoughts?  The reason is that David knows that sexual sin is a symptom, not the disease.  People give way to sexual sin because they don’t have fullness of joy and gladness in Jesus.  Their spirits are not steadfast and firm and established.  They waver.  They are enticed, and they give way because God does not have the proper place in their feelings and thoughts. (John Piper, Shaped By God, 37)

Hosea and Gomer (Hosea 1:1-3)

Derek Kidner begins his comments on the first chapter of Hosea by saying:

“It is the people you love who can hurt you most.  One can almost trace the degree of potential pain along a scale—from the rebuff you hardly notice from a stranger, to the rather upsetting clash you may have with a friend, right on to the stinging hurt of a jilting, the ache of a parent-child estrangement, or, most wounding of all, the betrayal of a marriage.”

And that is exactly what we see here in the opening words of the book of Hosea—a tragic betrayal in the life of Hosea, which mirrors the treacherous betrayal by Israel to their God.

This morning we want to talk about Hosea and Gomer and God’s initial command to Hosea, found in vv. 1-3 of Hosea 1:

1 The word of the LORD that came to Hosea, the son of Beeri, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, and Hezekiah, kings of Judah, and in the days of Jeroboam the son of Joash, king of Israel. 2 When the LORD first spoke through Hosea, the LORD said to Hosea, “Go, take to yourself a wife of whoredom and have children of whoredom, for the land commits great whoredom by forsaking the LORD.”  3 So he went and took Gomer, the daughter of Diblaim, and she conceived and bore him a son.

We talked last week about the time frame of Hosea’s ministry, that it occurred in the decades immediately preceding the fall of Samaria and Assyria dispersing the people of Israel into foreign countries.  It was a time that initially experienced great prosperity and political stability, but in the 20 years leading up to the fall of Samaria in 722 B.C. it was a time filled with political intrigue and instability, moral decay and idolatry.

One might notice that Hosea mentioned only one king of Israel, Jeroboam II, while mentioning four kings of Judah, the southern kingdom.  Why did he skip over Zechariah, Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, Pekahiah and Hoshea?

Kings of Israel during the Ministry of Hosea, 760 to 720 B.C.

Dynasty of Jehu
Jeroboam II 793-752 B.C. Gave throne to his son
Zechariah 753-752 B.C. Assassinated
Dynasty of Shallum
Shallum 752 B.C. (one month) Assassinated
Dynasty of Menahem
Menahem 752-742 B.C. Gave throne to his son
Pekahiah 724-740 B.C. Overthrown in coup d’état
Dynasty of Pekah
Pekah 752-732 B.C. Assassinated
Dynasty of Hoshea
Hoshea 732-722 B.C. Died in exile

Well, it is probably because he regarded Jeroboam II as the last legitimate king of Israel.  Those who followed him were a batch of assassins and ambitious political climbers who had no right to the title “king.”  Also, it may be that Hosea hoped for better things from Judah.  Although he sometimes criticizes them, he prays that they would not follow Israel’s lead (4:15).

By the way, we know nothing of Beeri, Hosea’s father, but the inclusion of his name here keeps us from mistaking him and the last king of Israel, Hoshea.  These are variations of the same name, which also includes Joshua and Jesus.  The meaning of Hosea’s name is “Yahweh has saved.”

While Hoshea’s policies would lead to Israel’s collapse, listening to Hosea’s prophecies could be their salvation.  But would they listen?

In the midst of this period in Israel’s history, the “word of the Lord came to Hosea.”  This forms the beginning of Hosea’s ministry.  He was likely a young man at the time, possibly in his late teens to early 20’s.

It was not unusual for God to require his prophets to do some strange things as practical object lessons for stirring up the imagination or heart of His people.  God asked Isaiah to walk about naked and barefoot for three years as a sign of the coming exile of Egypt and Cush (Isaiah 20:3-5).  Ezekiel lay on his side for over a year near a small model of Jerusalem under siege (Ezekiel 4-5).  He was also forbidden to mourn when his wife died (24:15-18).

A prophet’s call could be agonizing.  Almost anything could be asked of him.  It would be difficult to find a more shattering demand than the one given to Hosea.

Here God says to Hosea

“Go, take to yourself a wife of whoredom and have children of whoredom, for the land commits great whoredom by forsaking the LORD.”

The NIV says…

“Go, marry a promiscuous woman and have children with her, for like an adulterous wife this land is guilty of unfaithfulness to the LORD.”

What both of these versions miss is the plurals, “wife of whoredoms” and “children of whoredoms.”  Like “men of bloods” (Psalm 5:6) and “man of sorrows” (Isa. 53:3) the plural indicates the frequency (even constancy) of the act, which shows that she was characterized as a whore already.

Obviously this seems very strange, even immoral, for God to ask Hosea to marry an adulterous woman.

Did God actually ask Hosea to marry a sexually promiscuous woman and why did he command Hosea to do this?  Also, is there just one woman presented here, or two women between chapter 1 and chapter 3?

Scholars throughout the centuries have tried to deal with this sticky moral issue.

Some say that Hosea’s words here are a mere parable or allegory with no basis in history.  But that seems unlikely, since he says she was the daughter of Diblaim in verse 3.  She is a real person with a real name and a real father.

Others say Hosea’s real-life wife was faithful, but chapter 1 is a metaphor and chapter 3 is a prophetic symbol of God’s compassion.  But it is difficult to imagine that Hosea’s preaching would have much impact if people knew that none of it was true, just a story to prove a point.  To have made up this story about her would have been cruel.

Others say chapters 1 and 3 are historical but two different women.  Hosea married two different prostitutes.  But the context helps us understand that Gomer is also the woman of chapter 3.  Notice that Hosea is told to “again” go and love her.

Some say that Hosea married Gomer, who was already an immoral woman.  She was faithful in the birth of the first child, but returned to harlotry and the two additional children are of doubtful paternity.  Or, she was possibly faithful in the births of all three, but then returned to harlotry.

That God would call Hosea to marry a sexually immoral woman does not violate the prohibition in Leviticus 21:14, for that applies only to those in the priesthood.

I believe that the language of verse 2 indicates that she was already a “promiscuous woman,” one given to sexual immorality.  After marrying her, she remained faithful for awhile—through the birth of the first child, or possibly all three.

She then abandoned Hosea for other lovers.  She became a prostitute, receiving fees for her favors (2:5b) and wearing the ornaments of a prostitute (2:2b).  In the process, she fell into destitution, went from lover to lover, and ultimately ended up as a slave.

Certainly Hosea’s action of marrying a woman known to be sexually immoral and then remarrying her pushes the envelope.  It is the very offense of Hosea’s action that strongly confirms that this is the correct interpretation.

“God has divorced Israel just as Hosea has divorced Gomer, but in both cases grace triumphs over righteous jealousy and the demands of the law.  Like the cross itself, Hosea’s action is a stumbling block.  A man does not normally take back a woman who has behaved the way Gomer did.” (Duane Garrett, p. 49).

Hosea’s tragic marriage doesn’t disqualify him from ministry, but serves as his credentials for speaking for Yahweh.  The fact that God’s word came to Hosea and told him to do this is the foundation of his ministry and his qualification for speaking for God.

The NIV translates the reason for Hosea’s marriage as “for like an adulterous wife this land is guilty of unfaithfulness to the LORD.”  So Hosea was to be bound to this woman as his wife in covenant union.  For better or for worse, the path of his life would be linked to hers.

Hosea would be like Yahweh, who also bound himself to a willful and wayward people (Deut 9:6).

Whereas the ESV has “children of whoredom,” the NIV more helpfully translates simply “have children with her.”  Now, it is possible that one or more of the children were the result of illicit love affairs by Gomer, and not really Hosea’s children.

Another possibly is that Hosea also took in children from Gomer’s previous sexual alliances.  In other words, he adopted her illegitimate children.

But it is more likely that God is talking about Hosea’s own progeny, but that they, being born of a promiscuous woman, would bear the disgrace of their mother’s behavior.  Of course, these children also represent Israel, and they would follow in the footsteps of their mother and be idolatrous as well.  In this sense Gomer may stand for the nation and her children the individual Isrealites.

“The reason for God’s astonishing command to Hosea is that ‘the land is guilty of the vilest adultery in departing from the Lord.’  In other words, God specifically tells Hosea to enter into the same kind of marriage that Yahweh himself is in.  Hosea is to experience the sorrows of God and thus speak in God’s place to the nation.  The Hebrew also implies that Israel’s acts of adultery against God have taken the people progressively further away from him.  Every act of apostasy and immorality has driven a wedge deeply between them and their God.” (Duane Garrett, p. 54)

For centuries Israel’s relationship with God had been cast in the form of treaties.  Hosea introduces the idea that Israel is married to God in a covenant relationship, the very closest relationships we experience.

Just as it is shocking that Gomer pursues other lovers against the backdrop of Hosea’s undying love, so it is to shock Israel that they were betraying Yahweh’s undying love by playing the harlot with the Baals.

In our culture, where prostitution as a profession has achieved respect in many circles, and where promiscuity is widely celebrated as a legitimate life style, it is difficult to hear the depth of the offense that would have been generated in Hosea’s time by this divine command. Perhaps the closest we can come is to consider a command to “marry a sexual addict.”

In Hosea, Gomer’s irrepressible unfaithfulness mirrors the headlong rush of Israel “looking for love in all the wrong places,” thus endangering its very existence as God’s people.

God says that “this land is guilty.”  This is likely a reference to the nation itself, but it serves to recall the promises that God had made to Abraham (Genesis 12, 15, 17), as well as the exodus and conquest under Moses, Joshua and the Judges.  “It pricks the consciences of Israel with the reminder that their land was a gift from God, to be used in celebration of his covenant, and to be retained only by total loyalty to him.” (David Alan Hubbard, p. 67)

Yet, that land and its people were involved in “great harlotry”—engrossed in spiritual adultery.

These three short verses help us to see two things which stand out.  First, Hosea is obedient to this command.  Verse 3 says “so he went and took Gomer,” normal Old Testament language for getting married.

Whether Hosea knew the depth of pain he would come to feel from Gomer’s infidelities and rejection, he certainly knew that he was in for a significant amount of pain.  She was, after all, a woman given to sexual immorality.

Sometimes being obedient to God results in more pain, not a happy life.  Hosea enters into the worst sort of marriage, something none of us would wish on our own worst enemies.

Hosea’s intimate insight into the heart of God led precisely to his involvement with the anguish of God, that is, that anguish in which love is itself in the center of the pain, crushed and yet still alive.  Hosea’s willingness to bear the pain becomes the possibility of divine revelation, as he takes it on both in the passion of his preaching and in the very fabric of his daily life. (Elizabeth Achtemeier, Minor Prophets, p. 5).

Like Gomer, Israel had become unfaithful to God soon after their “wedding” at Mt. Sinai.  God did, in fact, predict that Israel would prostitute themselves with Canaanite gods (Deuteronomy 31:16).

The most direct example of Israel’s spiritual harlotry in the wilderness is Aaron’s initiative to construct and worship the golden calf (Exodus 32:1-35).  Interestingly, this event took place at Mount Sinai immediately before God entered into covenant with Israel as a people…The people asked Aaron to shape an idol for them to worship because they lost faith in God in the absence of Moses’ presence. This loss of faith is not exceptional in the Exodus narrative; it is symptomatic of Israel’s relationship with God during the first few months following their departure from Egypt (Exodus 16:1-8, 17:1-7).

Jeremiah, however, does say this:

“Go and proclaim in the hearing of Jerusalem, Thus says the Lord,

“I remember the devotion of your youth,
your love as a bride,
how you followed me in the wilderness,
in a land not sown.

There is a similar expression in Hosea 2:14-15.

The Lord recalled how His people used to love (Heb. hesed) Him devotedly when they were following Him through the wilderness from Egypt to the Promised Land. Those were the days of Israel’s betrothal as a youth, before she settled down with the Lord in the land (cf. Hos. 1—3). Even though the Israelites were not completely faithful to the Lord in the wilderness, their commitment to Him then was much stronger than it was in the days of the prophets.

Why then, did God choose to redeem Israel if not because they were a people faithful to Him?  Ezekiel repeatedly claims that God stuck by Israel because the reputation of His word was at stake (Ezekiel 20:5-6, 20:9, 20:14, 20:22).  These texts explicitly state that God brought Israel out of Egypt because of His promise to their forefathers (Exodus 2:23-24).

In Deuteronomy 7 God explains to Israel why they are receiving the land then possessed by the  Canaanites:

6 “For you are a people holy to the LORD your God. The LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for his treasured possession, out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. 7 It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the LORD set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, 8 but it is because the LORD loves you and is keeping the oath that he swore to your fathers, that the LORD has brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.

This is not to say that there were no Israelites who remained faithful to YHWH, merely that the reasons the Bible gives for God’s deliverance of Israel are the covenant promises God made to Abraham (Genesis 15:12-21), Isaac (Genesis 26:2-5), and Jacob (Genesis 35:9-15), not the righteousness or greatness of the people (Exodus 7:7-8).  Ezekiel later writes that God stayed faithful to Israel because of His reputation, despite their rejection of Him.  The prophet is pointing out that being faithful to His promises is a fundamental part of God’s nature; the Bible is riddled with expressions that verify this (Numbers 23:19, Titus 1:2, James 1:17), the most explicit being Hebrews 6:18 which states that “it is impossible for God to lie.”

And aren’t we glad that this is true?  God chose us and chose to love us not because we were good or obedient or faithful to Him.  Precisely the opposite.  God loved us and Christ died for us “while we were still sinners” (Romans 5:8).  God justifies “the ungodly” (Romans 4:5).

Throughout the Bible, especially in the prophets, God is depicted as being torn between his hatred of sin, and his love for sinners.  The prophets Hosea and Jeremiah demonstrate God’s love for His people, and his reluctance to give up hope that they will return to Him.  In His love for humanity, the Creator humbles Himself before the universe as He takes on the role of a lover spurned, a lover who refuses to give in even when the object of His love turns around and spits Him in the face through public prostitution.

“The prophecy of Hosea is a tapestry of grace.  As the prophet loved a woman whose crudeness and brazenness must have hurt him deeply, so God’s grace comes to his people in their unloveliness.  Our spiritual condition is never so low that God cannot woo and receive us back to himself as Hosea received Gomer.” (McComiskey, The Minor Prophets, p. 17)

Let me close with words from John H. Johansen:

So Hosea became the first prophet of repentance, anticipating the Prodigal Son in his appeal to the Prodigal Nation.  This is the greatest thing about his message—the persistence of God’s love.  Unfaithful as Israel had been, and certain as was her down, this fact did not obscure the divine love.  God’s love is constant; it is not canceled by human sin.  No wonder Hosea stands as the greatest Old Testament exponent of the redeeming love of God. (John H. Johansen, “The Prophet Hosea: His Marriage and Message, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, p. 179)

It speaks of the love of election and Calvary.  Thus, A. W. Pink wrote

Christ died not in order to make God love us, but because He did love His people. Calvary is the supreme demonstration of Divine love.  Whenever you are tempted to doubt the love of God, Christian reader, go back to Calvary. (Attributes of God, p. 81).

You can listen to Grace Still Amazes on KENA at 7:45 a.m. on Sundays and Saturday at 7 a.m., Sunday at 8 a.m., and starting Sunday January 6, 2018 will also air at 11:45am on Sundays on KAWX.  Often this posting will be longer and include more material than the radio broadcast, which is 15 minutes.

Duane Garrett’s commentary in the New American Commentary series, has the best discussion of the issue of whether Hosea actually married a sexually promiscuous woman (Hosea, Joel, pp. 43-49).  Also, click on the metaphor marriage of hosea, leif fredheim (journal of interdisciplanary undergraduate research)