They Keep Watch Over Your Souls, part 2 (Hebrews 13:18-19)

Last week we talked about the obedience and submission that congregations owe to their spiritual leaders: “Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you” (Heb. 13:17).

But that is not all we owe our leaders. Verses 18-19

18 Pray for us, for we are sure that we have a clear conscience, desiring to act honorably in all things. 19 I urge you the more earnestly to do this in order that I may be restored to you the sooner.
If we don’t pray for our leaders, they will certainly be preyed upon. Satan would like nothing more than to destroy the lives and testimonies of our spiritual leaders and he seems to be having a field day lately.

Jesus told Peter, “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” (Luke 22:31-32).

Peter didn’t know how vulnerable he was to Satan’s attacks and most of us are not vigilant enough to successfully avoid his deceptions and temptations. The only way that Peter survived this ordeal and didn’t end his life like Judas did, is because Jesus prayed for him. That same thing may be true for any pastor today: Unless people are praying for you, you will fall and fail. The situation is that precarious. If you don’t want to see your pastor fall, then be praying for him.

Fortunately, we know that both the Son (Romans 8:34) and the Holy Spirit (Romans 8:26) are constantly interceding for us—that is one of our assurances that we will persevere to the end and be saved. But we need the intercession of other believers to help us from falling into particular sins or making grievous mistakes in ministry. We need others praying for us and to know that they are praying for us.

If Apostles needed the prayers of the churches, how much more ordinary ministers! “Brethren, pray for us.” (John Brown, Geneva Series Commentaries: Hebrews, 713) Charles Spurgeon indicated that the success of his ministry was not really due to his own giftedness or earnestness, but the prayers of his congregation.

Spurgeon was a19th-century English preacher and pastor of the New Park Street Chapel in London, England, later named the Metropolitan Tabernacle.\

The church held 5,000 people. With no sound system, it was said that his voice could be heard by all.

A group of young ministers called on him one day to see the large preaching place. After showing them his massive sanctuary, Spurgeon offered to show then his “boiler room.” The guests declined but the pastor insisted.

Spurgeon led them to the basement. They found about 100 people in prayer. “This,” Spurgeon said with a smile, “is my boiler room.” Whenever Spurgeon was asked the secret of his ministry he always replied, “My people pray for me.”

The thought occurred to me: “Wouldn’t it be wonderful if every church had a boiler room; an asking place in the building where people would seek the will of God.

Nothing warms a preacher’s heart more than to have a faithful member say, “Reverend, I want you to know that I pray for you.”

Thus, Mark Labberton says, “I’m convinced that the dynamic life of the congregation I serve is explained by God’s grace answering the humble prayers of ordinary believers who seek God’s blessing for all we do. That is the story of power and prayer. I am utterly dependent on the way the prayers of such saints have changed my life and ministry. I think the same is true of our whole church. We are what we are by the grace of God at work through the prayers of these saints who lean on God for our sake and for the sake of all we long to see happen in our ministry, both locally and globally” (Mark Labberton, The Dangerous Act of Worship, 129).

So our author asks his hearers to pray for him, as Paul often does as well (Rom. 15:30-32; Eph. 6:19-20; Col. 4:3-4; 1 Thess. 5:25; cf. Phil. 1:19). Paul knew that if he was not prayed for, he would be preyed upon. The world, the flesh and the devil are our constant enemies, seeking to bring us down. Again, seeing how many pastors have fallen just in the past five years is a warning to us to keep our pastors in our prayers.

The reason that our writer wanted his readers to pray for him is because “we are sure that we have a clear conscience, desiring to act honorably in all things.” Previously the “cleansing” (katharizō) of our consciences by the blood of Christ referred to the objective result of forgiveness, which immediately removes defilement and disqualification to approach God’s presence. Now, however, a (lit.) “good [kalos] conscience” reflects the subjective transformation God’s grace produces in believers’ motivations and desires over time.

I think this first of all points back to all that he has communicated to these Hebrew Christians, saying that his conscience is clear in all that he has written—it was done with honorable intentions and for their good.

The writer’s conscience is clear because he has performed well in his spiritual duties toward his friends. His conscience has made him confident toward both men and God. Similarly, Paul could write, “For our boast is this, the testimony of our conscience, that we behaved in the world with simplicity and godly sincerity, not by earthly wisdom but by the grace of God, and supremely so toward you” (2 Corinthians 1:12). And, “By the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God” (2 Corinthians 4:2). What a blessing a clear conscience is! When the conscience is clear, one can ask wholeheartedly for the prayers of all the saints.

Likely this refers to the warnings that he has given his readers. Like Ezekiel, who was a watchman for old covenant Israel, the author of Hebrews was tasked with encouraging his audience away from apostasy and with telling them what would happen if they abandoned the Lord (see Ezek. 3:16-21). Having fulfilled that role with this letter, the author and his fellow workers could rest, knowing that they had done their duty.

But I also think he is wanting their prayers so that he could continue to live with a good conscience. It not only points back to previous ministry but forward to potential ministry. He doesn’t just want to preach the gospel to them; he wants a life that’s lived in line with the gospel. He knows how important it is to practice what he preaches. He knows that he needs the gospel preached to himself every day and asks that they would pray that he could live in line with that gospel.

Paul David Tripp has written a book entitled Dangerous Calling, which is written to pastors with the realization that we can go through the routines of ministry without having a genuine, deep relationship with the God we proclaim. In other words, in the words of John Piper, we have become “professionals.” In that book Brothers, We are Not Professionals, Piper writes:

We pastors are being killed by the professionalizing of the pastoral ministry … Professionalism has nothing to do with the essence and heart of the Christian ministry. The more professional we long to be, the more spiritual death we will leave in our wake. For there is no professional childlikeness (Matt. 18:3); there is no professional tenderheartedness (Eph. 4:32); there is no professional panting after God (Ps. 42:1).

Professionals can stand apart from a congregation and speak dispassionately. A true pastor cannot. A true pastor gets personal. A true pastor is real before his congregation. A true pastor practices what he preaches. A true pastor knows that the most important thing he can give to his congregation is a holy life. A true pastor knows that he deeply needs the prayers of his congregation in order to live faithfully before them.

God’s leaders face temptations that most other believers do not face to the same degree, because Satan knows that, if he can undermine the leaders, many others will go down with them. If he can get them to compromise, to weaken their stand, to lessen their efforts, to become dejected and hopeless, he has caused the work of Christ great damage.

Paul did not hesitate to ask for prayer. “Pray on my behalf, that utterance may be given to me in the opening of my mouth, to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel” (Eph. 6:19). How much more do God’s ordinary ministers need the prayer of their people. (John MacArthur Jr., The MacArthur NT Commentary: Hebrews, 448). If the apostle Paul was that aware of his need for prayer, how much more the rest of us who attempt to serve the Lord! As Paul exclaimed, “Who is adequate for these things?” (2 Cor. 2:16).

Our author’s request honors his hearers, implying that they have the priestly privilege of access to God’s throne of grace (Heb. 4:14-16). He wants them to realize how vital this is for his success in ministry and in life. Maintaining a good conscience means that he can confidently stand before the judgment seat knowing that he will be rewarded for the “gold, silver and precious stones” with which he has built his ministry.

The verb “pray” is present tense, showing that our writer recognizes his need for their prayers constantly, not just occasionally. It also graciously indicates that he knew that they had already been praying for him. Notice also that he asks pray for “us.” Up until now Paul has sometimes placed himself in the same status as his readers, but he is probably referring to Timothy, who may be able to come with him when he next visits (Heb. 13:23).

Also, the fact that he asks them to pray for him indicates that not all of them had apostatized. He hardly would have asked for prayer from them if he knew that all of them were unbelievers. No, he was confident that at least some of his readers would persevere, so he turned to them for spiritual assistance. His readers, in turn, were to pray for him and his fellow workers, believing that God just might allow the author to visit them sooner. After all, we know that prayers do much in the purposes of God, and through our prayers He often works out His will (James 5:13-18).

Our writer makes one simple request, “that I may be restored to you the sooner” (v. 19). This is why he wanted them to “more earnestly” (v. 19). Like the Apostle Paul, he loved his followers so much that he longed to be with them. This shows his great affection for them. He wanted to see them face to face and have fellowship together. If they fail to pray, his return to them may be slowed or possibly never take place. But if they pray, he expects that their prayers will speed his restoration.
Some obstacle stood in Paul’s way; some difficulty blocked his path. We don’t know if it was a health problem, persecution and imprisonment or something else. Possibly some critics voiced the idea, “If he really cared for us, we would have seen his face by now!” But the author’s heart was to visit them, and so he asks them to pray.

His request shows that God is bigger than any circumstance we face, and that prayer is our means of laying hold of God’s power. Prayer is not just a polite gesture that shows brotherly concern. God has ordained prayer as one of the ways that He pours out His power and blessing on His people. Prayer shows us that we are not competent people who just need a little boost from God now and then. We are totally inadequate, unless He works, and He has chosen to work through our prayers. If more people prayed more regularly for their pastors, maybe there would be fewer church splits and fewer people leaving churches over petty matters, fewer pastors quitting. (adapted from Steve Cole’s sermon Your Duties Toward Church Leaders).

As far as the writer to the Hebrews was concerned their prayers determined if and when he is reunited with them. This shows how seriously he regarded their prayers for him and how important prayer is as a secondary cause of God’s will being enacted. God is sovereign, but prayer makes things possible that otherwise would not be possible. (John MacArthur Jr., The MacArthur NT Commentary: Hebrews, 449)

He knows that if the readers pray for him, the bond of unity between himself and the recipients of his letter is strengthened. And if they pray, they indicate that the message he conveys has been well received. (William Hendriksen & Simon J. Kistemaker, NT Commentary: Hebrews, 428)

His desire to be “restored” to them implies that he had previously ministered among them. This explains his detailed knowledge of their previous experience (Heb. 6:9-10; 10:32-34). Like other NT authors, he prefers ministry offered in person to written correspondence (Gal. 4:18-20; 3 John 1-14). He has urged them to encourage each other daily as they meet together (Heb. 3:14; 10:24-25), and he is eager to join them in that interaction. In the second cycle of closing news he will indicate that Timothy may accompany him “if he comes soon” (13:23), reemphasizing his sense of urgency to return to them “soon.”

A. W. Pink reminds us pastors: “If ministers desire the prayers of their people, then let them see to it that they are not backward in praying for those God has committed to their charge. This is an essential part of the minister’s functions. It is not sufficient that he faithfully preaches the Word: he must also fervently and frequently ask God to bless that Word unto those who have heard him. O that all who are called to the sacred office may feelingly exclaim “God forbid that I should sin against the Lord in ceasing to pray for you” (1 Sam. 12:23). (Arthur W. Pink, An Exposition of Hebrews, 1265-6)

If you want to hear a better sermon Sunday, then pray for your pastor throughout the week. R. Kent Hughes encourages us: “How different the modern church would be if the majority of its people prayed for its pastors and lay leadership. There would be supernatural suspensions of business-as-usual worship. There would be times of inexplicable visitations from the Holy Spirit. More lay people would come to grips with the deeper issues of life. The leadership vacuum would evaporate. There would be more conversions. (R. Kent Hughes, Preaching the Word: Hebrews, vol. 2, 239)

This passage emphasizes the mutual ministry between the pastor/preacher and the congregation. For the pastor to be able to remain faithful in his life and ministry he vitally depends upon the prayers of the people. This is the body image that Paul expounds upon and to which the author of Hebrews frequently alludes. So Philip Ryken says:

The metaphor of the church as a body is employed by the NT to represent both our union with Christ and mutual dependence: “The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I have no need of you’” (1 Cor 12:21). We need each other: “We, who are many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another” (Rom 12:5). We need each other’s gifts (Eph 4:11-16; 1 Cor 12-14; Rom 12). We need each other’s graces (as in the many “one anothers” found throughout the NT: love one another, be kind to one another, bear one another’s burdens, etc.). We need each other’s fellowship. So we are warned, “Let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together.” The writer to the Hebrews sees the public assembly as the primary place in which the mutual stimulation to “love and good deeds” takes place: “Not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the day drawing near” (Heb 10:24-25). (Philip Graham Ryken, Give Praise to God A Vision for Reforming Worship, 330-1)

The simple truth is that we need each other. We are not independent titans who can conquer the world on our own, but a band of brothers who together, each fulfilling our God-given roles with the gifts God has graciously given to us, can accomplish great things together.

On one of his visits to the Continent, Charles Spurgeon met an American minister who said, “I have long wished to see you, Mr. Spurgeon, and to put one or two simple questions to you. In our country there are many opinions as to the secret of your great influence. Would you be good enough to give me your own point of view?” After a moment’s pause, Spurgeon replied, “My people pray for me” (in Iain Murray, The Forgotten Spurgeon [Banner of Truth], p. 44). Maybe we should listen to him.

Remember: Your pastor, if you won’t pray for him, he will be preyed upon. Satan would love to discourage him, to make him fall, to bring about some moral failure, because Satan knows, the bigger they are, the harder they fall, and more people fall in their wake. In other words, if your pastor falls, many people will be disillusioned. Of course, to be disillusioned, that means that they had to have the illusion to begin with that their pastor was a superman who could never fall. So pray for your pastor, pray diligently, pray earnestly for him.

They Keep Watch Over Your Souls, part 1 (Hebrews 13:17)

We saw earlier in Hebrews 13 where our author encouraged his readers to “imitate the faith” of those who had taught them the Word of God, their “leaders” (Heb. 13:7). These leaders had been there to help them avoid following after “strange teachings” (Heb. 13:9) but now some of them were no longer with them. They still had leaders, however, and now in our passage today our author encourages them to “obey” and “submit” to them.

Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you.

Notice first of all, in both Hebrews 13:7 and verse 17 that this congregation had multiple leaders. A plurality of elders was the biblical norm (Acts 11:30; 14:23; 16:4; 20:17-18; 21:18; 1 Timothy 5:17; Titus 1:5; James 5:14; 1 Peter 5:1-5).

There are several advantages to having a plurality of leadership.

  1. Biblical accountability. Godly fellow elders are a great means for holding the pastor accountable to live, teach, and lead faithfully. In addition, sharing authority among a number of men can keep one man from wrongly lording it over the congregation
  2. Wisdom. There is more wisdom to be found in a multitude of counselors (Prov. 11:14; 24:6).
  3. Balance. No one man has all the gifts that are necessary to build up the church. Having a plurality of elders serves the church by bringing men with different gifts into the church’s leadership who can complement the pastor’s strengths.
  4. Burden sharing. Caring for the whole church is a burden God does not intend one man to bear alone. Even the most faithful, gifted pastor needs help from other godly men in order to pay careful attention to himself and to all the flock (Acts 20:28).
  5. Sets an example for the church. Having a plurality of elders demonstrates that the work of ministry is not reserved for a select few. Rather, it provides an example of maturity for every man, particularly when some of the elders are men who work ordinary jobs and are not paid by the church.

(Most of this material has been adapted from Benjamin Merkle, 40 Questions About Elders and Deacons [Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2008], pp. 183-186).

Like 1 Thessalonians 5:12-13 and Hebrews 13:7, Hebrews 13:17 directly communicates the responsibility of the congregation to its leaders. By using not one, but two imperative verbs, “obey” (πείθω [peitho]) and “submit” (ὑπείκω [hypeiko]), placed before and after the expression “your leaders,” indicates intensity. “The combination of these two terms,” writes one commentator, “stresses the need for faithful, thorough adherence to the oversight offered by their leaders” (Gareth Lee Cockerill, The Epistle to the Hebrews, p. 708). Thus, this was an urgent issue for the inspired writer of Hebrews and indeed for every church.

The verb “obey” is not the most normal word for obedience (which is ὑπακοή [hupokoe]). This word, sometimes translated “belief” or “confidence,” emphasizes that we follow a leader because we have confidence in them. This doesn’t exclude the idea of obedience, for obedience is natural when we have confidence in someone. We believe that they have our best at heart and so we are not afraid to entrust ourselves to them and to follow their leadership.

The verb “submit” is the stronger and broader of the two terms and its use here is it only occurrence in the New Testament. Again, it is not the normal word for submission in the New Testament (which is ὑποτάσσω). It means to “yield to someone’s authority” or a “glad disposition to follow the leadership of another person.”

I love how John Piper puts it:

Hebrews 13:17 means that a church should have a bent toward trusting its leaders; you should have a disposition to be supportive in your attitudes and actions toward their goals and directions; you should want to imitate their faith; and you should have a happy inclination to comply with their instructions.

Now you can hear that these are all soft expressions: “a bent toward trusting,” “a disposition to support,” “a wanting to imitate,” “an inclination to comply.” What those phrases are meant to do is capture both sides of the Biblical truth, namely, 1) that elders are fallible and should not lord it over the flock, and 2) the flock should follow good leadership.

We live in an individualistic and anti-authority age which makes it unthinkable for some people to submit to the authority of anyone else. But even more serious, is the fact that some leaders in churches have spiritually abused the people under them. This verse does not justify spiritual abuse.

The authority of elders comes from the Word of God, not from themselves. Also, Jonathan Leeman, in his helpful book Authority: How Godly Rule Protects the Vulnerable, Strengthens Communities, and Promotes Human Flourishing, says that the authority that elders possess is not the authority of command, but the authority of counsel.

“Both authority of command and the authority of counsel should be counted as true authority because God has given its holder the moral right to issue directives that bind the conscience. The difference is, someone with an authority of command also has the right to enforce what’s commanded through the power of discipline. The authority is unilaterally efficacious. It can enforce or make something happen against the will of those being commanded. With an authority of counsel, on the other hand, the power of discipline is dramatically reduced, if not altogether eliminated. It’s not unilaterally efficacious in the same way” (Jonathan Leeman, Authority, p. 153).

Now, why don’t elders have the authority to enforce a command? It is because ultimately church discipline lies in the hands of the congregation, not the elders (Matthw 18:15-18). Elders can guide that discipline process, but the ability to enforce certain standards lies in the hands of the congregation. The authority that elders possess is not “just counsel,” but “the authority of counsel.” As they teach the congregation, they are presenting God’s will for us all, to which we should all submit and for which we all will one day be held accountable.

“The Bible is acutely aware of both good and bad authority, and it intends for us to study both. Consider the Israelite king. The king is over his kingdom. Yet he’s a good king only insofar as he puts himself under God’s law and with his fellow Israelites” (Jonathan Leeman, Authority, p. 10).
This is what Israel’s kings were supposed to do:

18 When he takes the throne of his kingdom, he is to write for himself on a scroll a copy of this law, taken from that of the Levitical priests.
19 It is to be with him, and he is to read it all the days of his life so that he may learn to revere the LORD his God and follow carefully all the words of this law and these decrees
20 and not consider himself better than his fellow Israelites and turn from the law to the right or to the left. Then he and his descendants will reign a long time over his kingdom in Israel. (Deuteronomy 17:18-20)

Good human authority is never absolute. Good authority is always accountable. Good authority drives inside the lines that God has painted on the road! In fact, good authority is always submissive. Only God’s authority is absolute and comprehensive, being accountable only to the law of his own nature.

Alexander Strauch notes: “The effectiveness of any body of church leaders is impacted by the response of the people they lead. One angry person or a small hostile group of people can cause untold misery and ugly division within a local church. This was the case in Corinth, and it created painful division between Paul and the church (2 Cor. 2:1-11)” (Alexander Strauch, Biblical Eldership, Rev. ed., p. 275).

Abuse doesn’t just happen in one direction, from leaders to people. Just as often there is abuse from the congregation towards the pastor or elders. There are many hurting pastors as well. R. Kent Hughes, in his commentary on Hebrews, says “It is an indisputable fact–pastors as a group are one of the most abused and hurting segments of modern society.” Now that abuse could come because of something that pastor does or fails to do: laziness, ineptness, abuse of power to name a few.

Happy is the congregation when both halves of this verse are happily married—a congregation that willingly and joyfully follows and a leadership that leads in love. That loving leadership is expressed in the second half of the verse, “because they keep watch over your souls.” This reflects the shepherding imagery which was used by God to describe rulers in the Old Testament and lies beneath the understanding of the role of elders in the New Testament.

Good leaders have as their highest aspiration not power and authority, but the good of the people, especially the condition of their souls. They want to make sure that these men and women, boys and girls, are saved and sanctified, glorifying and enjoying God. They are working for the joy of their people (2 Cor. 1:24). In 2 Corinthians 1:24 Paul says, “Not that we lord it over your faith, but we work with you for your joy, for you stand firm in your faith.”

So we follow the leadership of our elders and pastors because they have a great responsibility to shepherd our souls. They “keep watch” with great vigilance and untiring effort because we have enemies that can attack us. This was the duty of watchmen on city walls (Ezek. 33:6) and shepherds tending flocks in open country (Ezek. 34:8). Watchmen who fail to sound the alarm when enemies approach and shepherds who do not protect the flock from predators will answer to God for their negligence. All will give account to God (Rom. 4:12; Heb. 4:13; 10:21; 12:29; 1 Pet. 4:5).
Church leaders are answerable not only for themselves (1 Tim. 4:16) but also for those they lead (Acts 20:26-31; James 3:1). Spiritual leaders should be obeyed precisely because of what they do sacrificially for their people. Good elders keep themselves alert and awake, sometimes with sleepless nights. Why? Because they are responsible for the souls of the people God has allotted to their care.

“Watchfulness requires tireless effort, self-discipline and selfless concern for the welfare of others. At times all leaders literally do lose sleep over problem issues within the church. As Richard Philipps comments, ‘They lie awake at night…pondering our spiritual well-being, how they might help and support us in the faith. What better reason could there be for us gladly to follow their teaching and rule?’” (Alexander Strauch, Biblical Eldership, Rev. ed., p. 280).

There will come a day when pastor/elders will have to give an account for how well they looked after…not the finances of the church, nor the reputation of the church, nor the longevity of the church…but after the souls of the people.

When the Scripture tells us that our spiritual leaders are responsible for the welfare of our souls, this does not mean that we do not take personal responsibility for our spiritual welfare. On the contrary, what good spiritual leaders do is to equip and instruct their congregation in how to take care of themselves spiritually.

The Bible tells us that “we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive what is due for what he has done in the body, whether good or evil” (2 Cor. 5:10; cf. Rom. 14:12; 1 Cor. 3:13-15; Heb. 4:13). Although all believers will appear before “the judgment seat of Christ,” James informs us that teachers will be judged more strictly because of their greater influence and God-appointed responsibility (James 3:1). Even if we have responsibility for only one soul, we will be held accountable for taking care of that one soul. This concern should weigh heavily upon the leader and guard and guide the use of both their teaching and their authority.

Strauch mentions, “When God’s people realize that their leaders must give an account to God, they ought to be much more tolerant, understanding, and sensitive toward their leaders’ actions and decisions. All this helps explain why the members of the church owe obedience and submission to their leaders” (Alexander Strauch, Biblical Eldership, Rev. ed., p. 282)

When elders focus on taking care of people and helping them grow to maturity in Christ and the people are following that leadership gladly, then it leads to “joy and not…groaning.” Every leader knows the joy of leading someone to Christ, seeing them grow in their faith, hope and love, watching them serve Christ and seeing them lead others to Christ. John the Apostle expressed this joy to his friend Gaius: “I have no greater joy than to hear that my children are walking in the truth” (3 John 4). Paul calls the Philippians his “joy and crown” (Phil. 4:1). This joy, which every leader longs for (2 Cor. 2:3), is possible only when the congregation cooperates by submitting to the Scriptural instruction of God-appointed leaders.

But, when God’s people stubbornly disobey, endless complain and quarrel, or publicly attack their spiritual leaders, the joys of pastoral leadership quickly diminish and may disappear entirely. According to recent surveys, around 42% of pastors have seriously considered quitting ministry within the last year, which translates to a significant number of pastors contemplating leaving their positions, though the exact number of pastors who actually left in 2023 is not readily available due to the lack of comprehensive data on pastor turnover.

Conflict over COVID, over politics, over ethical issues, over interpretations of Scripture, you name it, it is rampant in churches today. Yet those are just the surface issues. Underneath it all are sins like pride, spiritual and emotional immaturity, change and inflexibility, abuses of power and unclear authority (https://www.bmbaonline.org/blog/2020/8/27/seven-causes-of-church-conflict).

When church members refuse to listen to their leader’s warnings of aberrant teaching, unacceptable behaviors, and disrespectful attitudes, the leaders groan in distress. The word groan expresses painful, frustrated emotion, even grief that words are unable to fully articulate (Mark 7:34; Rom. 8:23, 26).

Moses groaned many times because of the folly of the people’s complaints and blatant unbelief. At one point, the people’s complaining became so intolerable that Moses called on God to take his life: “I am not able to carry all this people alone; the burden is too heavy for me. If you will treat me like this, kill me at once, if I find favor in your sight, that I may not see my wretchedness” (Num. 11:14-15).

Paul also groaned and shed many tears because of the disobedience or waywardness of some of the people in his churches. Church work is not easy.

All leaders know this pain. Phillips Brooks, one-time Episcopal Bishop of Boston, said:
To be a true minister to men is always to accept new happiness and new distress. . . . The man who gives himself to other men can never be a wholly sad man; but no more can he be a man of unclouded gladness. To him shall come with every deeper consecration a before untasted joy, but in the same cup shall be mixed a sorrow that it was beyond his power to feel before. (Phillips Brooks, The Influence of Jesus (London: H. R. Allenson, 1895), p. 91)

A heart that can know and accept such pain is a glory to God.

O give us hearts to love like Thee,
Like Thee, O Lord, to grieve
Far more for others’ sins than all
The wrongs that we receive.

When the members refuse to obey and fail to respect their leaders, the work in the church becomes burdensome. The members ought to realize that neither they nor the leaders own the church. The church belongs to Jesus Christ, to whom the readers are responsible. Should they make the work and life of the leaders difficult, they would be the losers. (William Hendriksen & Simon J. Kistemaker, NT Commentary: Hebrews, 426-7)

That is what this last statement is about: “for that would be of no advantage to you.” When church members cause leaders to groan under the burdens of a resistant or rebellious congregation, then everyone loses. In other words, it’s a spiritual disaster. While disobedience distresses the leader, it has an even more serious impact on the resistant believer. This is the final reason why church members should “obey” and “submit to” their leaders.

This is a classic understatement: it would “be of no advantage to you” really means that it would be an extreme disadvantage to you. It is a figure of speech called a litotes, which uses a milder negative statement in place of a stronger, positive one. It is the opposite of a hyperbole. The expression is designed to cause the reader to stop dead in their tracks and think real hard about the negative impact not only to the leaders, but even to themselves and to the whole church. Stated positively, it would read, “that would be disastrous to you.”

An individual who understands submission to spiritual authority is humble, full of love, unselfish, accountable and personally responsible. Conversely, a person who rejects submission to spiritual authority is prideful, full of criticism, selfish, self-ruled, and spiritually irresponsible.

To put oneself outside the teaching and watch care of God’s chosen shepherds is dangerous business. God may severely chastise the disobedient believer (1 Cor. 11:29-34), the devil may delude their minds (2 Cor. 11:3) or a bitter spirit may set in, halting all spiritual growth and Christlike maturity. So the concluding remark is, as William Lane remarks, “a sober reminder that the welfare of the community is tied to the quality of their response to their current leaders” (William Lane, Hebrews, 2:556).

This explains why some churches remain stuck as a small church, because pastors come and go based upon the poor response they receive from the congregation. Matriarchs and patriarchs actually rule the church and oppose anything the new pastor might do to change the church.
Human nature tends to view leaders with suspicion. Don’t fall into that trap. Cultivate a bent to trusting your leaders, because that will not only make their serious job easier, but it will be better for you too. You can be involved in a virtuous cycle or a vicious cycle. The virtuous cycle goes like this: happy sheep make happy shepherds, and happy shepherds make for happy sheep. Everyone wins. The vicious cycle goes like this: unhappy sheep make for unhappy shepherds, and unhappy shepherds make for unhappy sheep. Everyone loses.

As Jared Wilson puts it:

It is my goal now, for as long as God would have me simply as a sheep and not a shepherd, to be as low-maintenance as I can manage for my church. When my pastor sees me coming … I want him not to inwardly sigh or tense up or have to marshal some extra patience or energy but to relax a little, smile, and feel safe…

Good church folks love, respect, and submit to their pastors.

This does not mean idolizing them, treating them like celebrities, or becoming yes-men. It doesn’t mean becoming our pastor’s rubber stamp committee. But it does mean giving grace not just to your fellow sheep but also to your shepherds. In fact, they may need more, as the responsibilities they carry are more burdensome and they will have to give a greater account before God. Submitting to your leaders means repenting of the impulse to “yes, but” everything they say, especially if what they say isn’t sinful. In matters of differences of opinion, it means being circumspect in how we voice our own.

…How can we work toward our leaders’ joy and not their anxiety? It’s no advantage to us to be a nagging pain to our pastors. They will have to give an account for how they pastored us. And we’ll have to give an account for how well we presented ourselves to be pastored.

Stick with Jesus, part 2 (Hebrews 13:11-16)

All throughout the book of Hebrews the author has been warning, encouraging and pleading with these Jewish Christians not to abandon their faith in Jesus and return back to the Jewish religious system with its sacrifices. The passage we have before us today refers back to those sacrifices, particularly the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) and the point is made that since that sacrifice happened “outside the camp” (v. 11), then we are to “go to [Jesus] outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured” (v. 13).

11 For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. 12 So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. 13 Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured. 14 For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come. 15 Through him then let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name. 16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.

The imagery shifts from the perennial peace offerings to the annual Day of Atonement sacrifices, when the high priest entered the Most Holy Place, carrying blood to atone first for his own sins and then for the sins of the people (9:7, 25). This annual rite has been contrasted with the self-sacrifice of Christ, who brought his own blood into the heavenly sanctuary, atoning for sins once for all (9:24-28; 10:10-14).

Now our attention is directed to what happened to the carcasses of the animals after their blood was brought into God’s presence. Whereas the meat of peace offerings could be consumed by priests and worshipers after the Lord’s best portions were consumed on the altar, on the Day of Atonement the whole bull and goat from which atoning blood had been taken were carried outside Israel’s camp and completely incinerated. They were destroyed “outside the camp,” the realm of what was unclean, unfit to be seen by the Lord, who “walks in the midst of your camp” (Deut. 23:14; cf. also Lev. 13:45-46; Num. 5:1-4).

The bodies of Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, were taken outside the camp after they were judged and killed for offering up strange fire on the altar. If someone blasphemed God they were stoned outside the camp (Lev. 24:14, 23). When Miriam, the sister of Moses, was stricken with leprosy, she had to spend seven days outside the camp (Num. 12:14ff.). After the sins of the people were symbolically laid on the head of the scapegoat it had to be taken outside the camp (Lev. 16).
Eventually Jerusalem itself was considered holy ground. Everything beyond its borders was considered unholy or profane. Golgotha, where Jesus was crucified, was considered outside the city.

Golgotha site photographed in about 1870.

The association of territory “outside the camp” with defilement and banishment from God’s holy presence explains the theological significance of the fact that Jesus was crucified “outside the gate” of Jerusalem (cf. John 19:16-17). He endured God’s wrath as he bore others’ sin in his body on the tree (Matt. 27:46; Rom. 3:24-25; 1 Pet. 2:24). By bearing our guilt and absorbing its penalty, this “holy, innocent, unstained” High Priest (Heb. 7:26) endured sin’s curse (2 Cor. 5:21; Gal. 3:13) and thereby “sanctified” all believers by his blood. Throughout this sermon, “sanctify” (hagiazō; Heb. 2:11; 10:10, 14), “cleanse” (katharizō; 9:14, 23), and “perfect” (teleioō; 7:19; 9:9; 101, 14) have designated the purging from defilement that now qualifies worshipers to approach God’s holy presence.

Jesus’ sacrifice sanctifies his people so that they may respond to divine grace with thankful and reverent worship (12:28), standing in God’s presence as priests and offering sacrifices pleasing to him (13:15-16).

Our author is communicating two great things: (1) All those who remained committed to the old Jewish system were excluded from the benefit of partaking of Christ’s atoning death. And, (2) Jesus’ death outside the camp means that he is accessible to anyone in the world who will come to him.
Jesus’ crucifixion outside Jerusalem represented not only his forsakenness by God but also his repudiation by the Jewish community, “his own” people (Mark 15:9-15, 29-32; John 1:11; Acts 3:13-15). Jesus bore “our reproach” (v. 13).

When he says that Jesus died “outside the city,” he means He died outside Judaism. The Lord was utterly rejected by Israel. Judaism didn’t want Him. He was taken OUTSIDE and crucified–as if He were refuse. Therefore, His death was totally outside the Jewish system; utterly removed from it. (C. S. Lovett, Lovett’s Lights on Hebrews, 331)

Jesus did faithfully prepare his disciples to endure the same rejection he had endured (Luke 6:22; John 16:2), and indeed they were rejected (John 9:22, 33; 12:42; Acts 18:5-7). To follow after Jesus is to carry one’s cross toward shameful death (Mark 8:23; Heb. 12:2). Now the recipients of this letter must be prepared to share the reproach that Jesus endured, just as Moses did long ago (Heb. 11:24-26). To join Jesus “outside the camp” may demand that one forgo access to the Jerusalem temple, acceptance in local synagogues, and acknowledgment by one’s own family (Matt. 10:35-38).
For the Christian there must be a real identification with Christ and his shame; he must enter into a genuine “fellowship of Christ’s sufferings (Phil 3:10), and be willing even, like the first martyr Stephen, to lay down his life for his Lord and Savior “outside the city” (Acts 7:58). The recipients of this letter had gone forth “outside the camp” to associate themselves with Christ and his cross; but now their resolve is weakening and they are being tempted to turn back in the hope of finding an easier and more respectable existence “inside the camp.” (Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, 580)

There was and even is today a price to be paid in following Jesus which the Jews of that age did not have to bear. But as Jesus was despised, so would be His disciples. The question is: Are we willing to pay the price?

Spurgeon said: “A sorry life your Master had, you see. All the filth in earth’s kennels was thrown at him by sacrilegious hands. No epithet was thought coarse enough; no terms hard enough; he was the song of the drunkard, and they that sat in the gate spoke against him. This was the reproach of Christ; and we are not to marvel if we bear as much. ‘Well,’ says one, ‘I will not be a Christian if I am to bear that.’ Skulk back, then, you coward, to your own damnation; but oh! Men that love God, and who seek after the eternal reward, I pray you do not shrink from this cross. You must bear it.”
Pursuing Jesus “outside the camp” comes at a price.

Yet one OT passage foreshadows the privilege now enjoyed by those who go “outside the camp” for Jesus’ sake. After Israel’s adultery with the golden calf, the Israelites’ defilement was so pervasive that Moses had to pitch the tent of meeting “outside the camp” (Exod. 33:7-11). That became the place where people went to meet with God. Because of institutional Judaism’s repudiation of the Messiah, the spheres of the holy community and the polluted wasteland have been reversed. Those unwelcome in earthly Jerusalem’s temple and expelled from synagogues have become heirs of God’s unshakable kingdom and citizens of “the city that is to come.” Admittedly, “here we [followers of Jesus] have no lasting city.” But within a few years, in AD 70, Roman troops would destroy Jerusalem and its temple on Mount Zion. That city, which the psalmists had extolled for its security (Psalm 48, 87), would lie in ruins. When compared to the promise of being welcomed into the coming city that abides forever, to be expelled from a community that has turned its back on God’s grace in Christ is no great loss.

There thus remains only one thing to do, and so the writer exhorts us: “Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured. For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come” (vv. 13, 14). Guthrie sees verse 13 as the crux of the conclusion, a final direct appeal to the readers to identify themselves wholly with Christ.” In other words, he says, “Christians, join Jesus in his sufferings!”

The cities of the earth—all earthly institutions—will fall apart. Only the heavenly Zion will remain. We must go, flee to him outside the camp, and willfully embrace his “reproach,” for such an act is worth doing a million times over! Thus Jesus Christ, who is “the same yesterday and today and forever,” becomes our constant meal—our food, our drink, our life—and we will receive from him grace upon grace upon grace. And because he is outside the camp, he will always be accessible. In fact, he is with us, in us, and coming to us! This understanding that he nourishes us and is accessible to us will help us stay on course.

The good news is that for those who bear His reproach, this world is the worst they will ever have it. The best is yet to come! But for cowards who turn their back on Jesus, this life is the absolute best they will ever have it.

May we not say, too, that the Son who invites us to join him “outside the camp” himself first left the “camp” of heaven, which is the true and abiding camp and to which he returned in triumph; and that he came to our unholy ground for the purpose of removing the defilement of his people and for the consecration and renewal of the whole creation, so that in the eternity of his glorious kingdom all will be one “camp,” one “city,” without blemish and without bounds, because there will no longer be any such things as unholy territory, and the harmony of heaven and earth, of God and man, will be established forevermore? (Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, 582-3)

Christ went outside the city gate and suffered. We must go after him, and to him. This means we have to relinquish all the privileges of the camp and the city for his sake. We have to leave them behind and go to him. We must cling by faith to his sacrifice and through this sanctification, in place of all the sacrifices of the law. We must own him under all that reproach and contempt that were heaped on him during his suffering outside the gate. We must not be ashamed of the cross of Christ. (John Owen, Crossway Classic Commentaries: Hebrews, 264)

It was time for Jewish Christians to declare their loyalty to Christ above any other loyalty, to choose to follow the Messiah whatever suffering that might entail, to “go out to him outside the camp.” They needed to move outside the safe confinement of their past, their traditions, and their ceremonies to live for Christ. Since Jesus was rejected by Judaism, they should reject Judaism. (Bruce Barton, Life Application Bible Commentary: Hebrews, 238)

First, to the Hebrews to whom this letter was addressed, they are being told that as long as they remain within old covenant Judaism they cannot eat at the altar of God’s grace in Jesus Christ. They must leave the old covenant and embrace the new covenant. If they are to share in the salvation that Christ has obtained they must renounce their trust and confidence in the sacrifices and rituals of the old covenant system and put their hope and trust in Jesus Christ who is himself the fulfillment of all that came before. They must sever themselves from the now outmoded Mosaic system and cleave unto Christ in whom that system has been fulfilled. Don’t look to the priesthood of Aaron. Don’t put your hope in the feasts and rituals of the old covenant. Put your trust entirely in him to whom all such religious practices pointed: Jesus!

Second, we are also being called to share in the reproach that Jesus endured (v. 13). Today we don’t have a literal “camp” or “city” outside of which we are to go. So the “camp” must represent or symbolize something else for us. I think it points to everything we regard as safe and secure and respectable. To go “outside the camp” is to move beyond the comfort and acceptance that this world offers us. Inside the camp, inside the city gates, is where we find familiarity and ease and affirmation and respect from this world and its value system. To follow Jesus outside the camp is to embrace and bear the shame and reproach he suffered. To join Jesus outside the camp is to willingly identify with him in his suffering and to move out among the lost and unbelieving people of this world. It’s only outside the camp that we will find the unreached people of the world.

And the only thing that makes this a reasonable thing to do is the simple but glorious truth stated in v. 14. There we read that we do this “because” here “we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come” (v. 14). We can joyfully embrace the reproach that Jesus himself endured because we are looking for the city to come, the heavenly Jerusalem that God has prepared for his people who trust him and put their hope in him.

Perhaps the Jews were trying to entice the Hebrew Christians back into the Jewish fold by saying, “We have Jerusalem, but you have no such glorious city!” The author says, “Oh, but we do have a city! Ours is the same city that Abraham and the patriarchs were seeking, that heavenly city that God prepared for them and us” (11:13-16). After 70 A.D. these Jews would no longer be able to claim Jerusalem for themselves.

The religious leaders clung to the city of Jerusalem and cast Jesus from it. They surely did not realize that within a short span of some forty years the city of Jerusalem and the temple they trusted in would be totally destroyed. On the Temple Mount platform there would not be one stone left standing upon another exactly according to Jesus’ words in Matthew 24:2.

This concept of a heavenly city and heavenly reward is something we’ve seen repeatedly in Hebrews. Do you recall in Hebrews 10:34 that Christians are described as having “joyfully accepted the plundering” of their property because they knew they “had a better possession and an abiding one”? They were seeking a city that is to come; a city that has foundations; the eternal and heavenly Jerusalem on the new earth. Knowing this was theirs, they gladly suffered for the sake of aiding and supporting other Christians. It was a permanent possession that could never be taken away from them.

We saw it in Hebrews 11:25-26 where Moses “refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward.” The reward is the heavenly Jerusalem, the place of God’s eternal dwelling with his people on the new earth.

And what is to be our response to this pursuit of Christ into a life with pain and suffering?

15 Through him [Jesus] then let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name. 16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.

Verse 15 says it is a life of praise to God — real, heartfelt, verbal praise — the kind that comes out of your mouth as the fruit and overflow of your heart.

In ancient days some Jewish rabbis believed that the time would come when all sacrifices would cease and instead there would be praises. Also, the First Century Jewish writer Philo spoke of a time when the best sacrifice would be the ones glorifying God with hymns. Indeed, in Psalm 50:23 it is written: “The one who offers thanksgiving as his sacrifice glorifies me, to the one who orders his way righty, I will show the salvation of God.”

Scholars feel the “fruit of lips” is taken from Hosea 14:2. In the Hebrew of this verse it reads literally “the young bulls of our lips” (par-im se-fa-te-nu). Praise is indeed like a sacrifice, that costs us something.

When our author refers to this worship as a “sacrifice,” it is an analogy that we’ve seen Paul and Peter use (Romans 12:2; 1 Peter 2:9). Under the New Covenant the sacrifices are no longer physical, but spiritual—the praise of our lips to the God who saved us.

In the words of Warren Wiersbe, “The words of praise from our lips, coming from our heart, are like beautiful frit laid on the altar” (The Wiersbe Bible Commentqry: New Testament, p. 844).
So we are to offer sacrifices…sacrifices of praise. This exhortation can only rightly be exercised “through him,” that is, through Jesus. It is only because of Him and what He has done for us that we have something to praise God for.

It is praise “to God,” certainly not to ourselves. We did absolutely nothing to deserve or gain our salvation. And this praise is to be “continuous,” why? Because of all that God has done for us through Christ. As we noticed in 12:28, worship is always our most natural response to our redemption. Praise, therefore, should be our constant habit. There should hardly be a moment when our lips are not trembling with praise for how kindly and graciously and tenderly and mercifully our God has dealt with us through His Son Jesus Christ.

This praise is further clarified as “the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name,” that is praise that publicly affirms our trust in Jesus Christ, acknowledging Him as our Savior and Lord.
The second response we should have toward our redemption in Christ is to love one another, a theme that began in verse 1, but here it is spelled out in very practical terms.

16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.

These works of “doing good” and “sharing what you have” would likely include the hospitality mentioned in Hebrews 13:2, as well as the ministry to prisoners in Hebrews 13:3. “Doing good” today can include a number of ministries: sharing food with the needy, transporting people to and from church or medical appointments, contributing to needy causes; perhaps just being a helpful neighbor.

Our highest aspiration as those being “conformed” to the image of Jesus, is to live a life that is “pleasing to God.” In my mind, pleasing God goes a step beyond obeying God. We obey the explicit commands or prohibitions of God, while we please God by knowing His heart well enough to know not so much what He demands, but what He desires.

When we go with Jesus to the place of his sacrifice outside the camp, we see more clearly than ever that his sacrifice for us — the sacrifice of himself, once for all for sinners (Hebrews 9:26, 28) — brings to an end all sacrifices except for two kinds: the sacrifice of praise to God (verse 15) and the sacrifice of love to people (verse 16).

Jim Elliot, Pete Fleming, Ed McCully, Nate Saint, and Roger Youderian were killed on January, 1956, in Ecuador, moving toward the need of the Auca Indians and not toward comfort.

Shortly before their deaths on Palm Beach they sang this hymn. Elliot writes,
At the close of their prayers the five men sang one of their favorite hymns, “We Rest on Thee,” to the stirring tune of “Finlandia.” Jim and Ed had sung this hymn since college days and knew the verses by heart. On the last verse their voices rang out with deep conviction.

We rest on Thee, our Shield and our Defender,
Thine is the battle, Thine shall be the praise,
When passing through the gates of pearly splendor
Victors, we rest with Thee through endless days.

With that confidence, they went to Jesus outside the camp. They moved toward need, not comfort, and they died. And Jim Elliot’s credo proved true: “He is no fool to give what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.” “Here we do not have a lasting city, but we are seeking the city which is to come” (Hebrews 13:14).

Stick with Jesus, part 2 (Hebrews 13:11-16)

All throughout the book of Hebrews the author has been warning, encouraging and pleading with these Jewish Christians not to abandon their faith in Jesus and return back to the Jewish religious system with its sacrifices. The passage we have before us today refers back to those sacrifices, particularly the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) and the point is made that since that sacrifice happened “outside the camp” (v. 11), then we are to “go to [Jesus] outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured” (v. 13).

11 For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. 12 So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. 13 Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured. 14 For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come. 15 Through him then let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name. 16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.

The imagery shifts from the perennial peace offerings to the annual Day of Atonement sacrifices, when the high priest entered the Most Holy Place, carrying blood to atone first for his own sins and then for the sins of the people (9:7, 25). This annual rite has been contrasted with the self-sacrifice of Christ, who brought his own blood into the heavenly sanctuary, atoning for sins once for all (9:24-28; 10:10-14).

Now our attention is directed to what happened to the carcasses of the animals after their blood was brought into God’s presence. Whereas the meat of peace offerings could be consumed by priests and worshipers after the Lord’s best portions were consumed on the altar, on the Day of Atonement the whole bull and goat from which atoning blood had been taken were carried outside Israel’s camp and completely incinerated. They were destroyed “outside the camp,” the realm of what was unclean, unfit to be seen by the Lord, who “walks in the midst of your camp” (Deut. 23:14; cf. also Lev. 13:45-46; Num. 5:1-4).

The bodies of Nadab and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, were taken outside the camp after they were judged and killed for offering up strange fire on the altar. If someone blasphemed God they were stoned outside the camp (Lev. 24:14, 23). When Miriam, the sister of Moses, was stricken with leprosy, she had to spend seven days outside the camp (Num. 12:14ff.). After the sins of the people were symbolically laid on the head of the scapegoat it had to be taken outside the camp (Lev. 16).

Eventually Jerusalem itself was considered holy ground. Everything beyond its borders was considered unholy or profane. Golgotha, where Jesus was crucified, was considered outside the city.

Golgotha site photographed in about 1870.

The association of territory “outside the camp” with defilement and banishment from God’s holy presence explains the theological significance of the fact that Jesus was crucified “outside the gate” of Jerusalem (cf. John 19:16-17). He endured God’s wrath as he bore others’ sin in his body on the tree (Matt. 27:46; Rom. 3:24-25; 1 Pet. 2:24). By bearing our guilt and absorbing its penalty, this “holy, innocent, unstained” High Priest (Heb. 7:26) endured sin’s curse (2 Cor. 5:21; Gal. 3:13) and thereby “sanctified” all believers by his blood. Throughout this sermon, “sanctify” (hagiazō; Heb. 2:11; 10:10, 14), “cleanse” (katharizō; 9:14, 23), and “perfect” (teleioō; 7:19; 9:9; 101, 14) have designated the purging from defilement that now qualifies worshipers to approach God’s holy presence.

Jesus’ sacrifice sanctifies his people so that they may respond to divine grace with thankful and reverent worship (12:28), standing in God’s presence as priests and offering sacrifices pleasing to him (13:15-16).

Our author is communicating two great things: (1) All those who remained committed to the old Jewish system were excluded from the benefit of partaking of Christ’s atoning death. And, (2) Jesus’ death outside the camp means that he is accessible to anyone in the world who will come to him.
Jesus’ crucifixion outside Jerusalem represented not only his forsakenness by God but also his repudiation by the Jewish community, “his own” people (Mark 15:9-15, 29-32; John 1:11; Acts 3:13-15). Jesus bore “our reproach” (v. 13).

When he says that Jesus died “outside the city,” he means He died outside Judaism. The Lord was utterly rejected by Israel. Judaism didn’t want Him. He was taken OUTSIDE and crucified–as if He were refuse. Therefore, His death was totally outside the Jewish system; utterly removed from it. (C. S. Lovett, Lovett’s Lights on Hebrews, 331)

Jesus did faithfully prepare his disciples to endure the same rejection he had endured (Luke 6:22; John 16:2), and indeed they were rejected (John 9:22, 33; 12:42; Acts 18:5-7). To follow after Jesus is to carry one’s cross toward shameful death (Mark 8:23; Heb. 12:2). Now the recipients of this letter must be prepared to share the reproach that Jesus endured, just as Moses did long ago (Heb. 11:24-26). To join Jesus “outside the camp” may demand that one forgo access to the Jerusalem temple, acceptance in local synagogues, and acknowledgment by one’s own family (Matt. 10:35-38).

For the Christian there must be a real identification with Christ and his shame; he must enter into a genuine “fellowship of Christ’s sufferings (Phil 3:10), and be willing even, like the first martyr Stephen, to lay down his life for his Lord and Savior “outside the city” (Acts 7:58). The recipients of this letter had gone forth “outside the camp” to associate themselves with Christ and his cross; but now their resolve is weakening and they are being tempted to turn back in the hope of finding an easier and more respectable existence “inside the camp.” (Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, 580)

There was and even is today a price to be paid in following Jesus which the Jews of that age did not have to bear. But as Jesus was despised, so would be His disciples. The question is: Are we willing to pay the price?

Spurgeon said: “A sorry life your Master had, you see. All the filth in earth’s kennels was thrown at him by sacrilegious hands. No epithet was thought coarse enough; no terms hard enough; he was the song of the drunkard, and they that sat in the gate spoke against him. This was the reproach of Christ; and we are not to marvel if we bear as much. ‘Well,’ says one, ‘I will not be a Christian if I am to bear that.’ Skulk back, then, you coward, to your own damnation; but oh! Men that love God, and who seek after the eternal reward, I pray you do not shrink from this cross. You must bear it.”
Pursuing Jesus “outside the camp” comes at a price.

Yet one OT passage foreshadows the privilege now enjoyed by those who go “outside the camp” for Jesus’ sake. After Israel’s adultery with the golden calf, the Israelites’ defilement was so pervasive that Moses had to pitch the tent of meeting “outside the camp” (Exod. 33:7-11). That became the place where people went to meet with God. Because of institutional Judaism’s repudiation of the Messiah, the spheres of the holy community and the polluted wasteland have been reversed. Those unwelcome in earthly Jerusalem’s temple and expelled from synagogues have become heirs of God’s unshakable kingdom and citizens of “the city that is to come.” Admittedly, “here we [followers of Jesus] have no lasting city.” But within a few years, in AD 70, Roman troops would destroy Jerusalem and its temple on Mount Zion. That city, which the psalmists had extolled for its security (Psalm 48, 87), would lie in ruins. When compared to the promise of being welcomed into the coming city that abides forever, to be expelled from a community that has turned its back on God’s grace in Christ is no great loss.

There thus remains only one thing to do, and so the writer exhorts us: “Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured. For here we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come” (vv. 13, 14). Guthrie sees verse 13 as the crux of the conclusion, a final direct appeal to the readers to identify themselves wholly with Christ.” In other words, he says, “Christians, join Jesus in his sufferings!”

The cities of the earth—all earthly institutions—will fall apart. Only the heavenly Zion will remain. We must go, flee to him outside the camp, and willfully embrace his “reproach,” for such an act is worth doing a million times over! Thus Jesus Christ, who is “the same yesterday and today and forever,” becomes our constant meal—our food, our drink, our life—and we will receive from him grace upon grace upon grace. And because he is outside the camp, he will always be accessible. In fact, he is with us, in us, and coming to us! This understanding that he nourishes us and is accessible to us will help us stay on course.

The good news is that for those who bear His reproach, this world is the worst they will ever have it. The best is yet to come! But for cowards who turn their back on Jesus, this life is the absolute best they will ever have it.

May we not say, too, that the Son who invites us to join him “outside the camp” himself first left the “camp” of heaven, which is the true and abiding camp and to which he returned in triumph; and that he came to our unholy ground for the purpose of removing the defilement of his people and for the consecration and renewal of the whole creation, so that in the eternity of his glorious kingdom all will be one “camp,” one “city,” without blemish and without bounds, because there will no longer be any such things as unholy territory, and the harmony of heaven and earth, of God and man, will be established forevermore? (Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, 582-3)

Christ went outside the city gate and suffered. We must go after him, and to him. This means we have to relinquish all the privileges of the camp and the city for his sake. We have to leave them behind and go to him. We must cling by faith to his sacrifice and through this sanctification, in place of all the sacrifices of the law. We must own him under all that reproach and contempt that were heaped on him during his suffering outside the gate. We must not be ashamed of the cross of Christ. (John Owen, Crossway Classic Commentaries: Hebrews, 264)

It was time for Jewish Christians to declare their loyalty to Christ above any other loyalty, to choose to follow the Messiah whatever suffering that might entail, to “go out to him outside the camp.” They needed to move outside the safe confinement of their past, their traditions, and their ceremonies to live for Christ. Since Jesus was rejected by Judaism, they should reject Judaism. (Bruce Barton, Life Application Bible Commentary: Hebrews, 238)

First, to the Hebrews to whom this letter was addressed, they are being told that as long as they remain within old covenant Judaism they cannot eat at the altar of God’s grace in Jesus Christ. They must leave the old covenant and embrace the new covenant. If they are to share in the salvation that Christ has obtained they must renounce their trust and confidence in the sacrifices and rituals of the old covenant system and put their hope and trust in Jesus Christ who is himself the fulfillment of all that came before. They must sever themselves from the now outmoded Mosaic system and cleave unto Christ in whom that system has been fulfilled. Don’t look to the priesthood of Aaron. Don’t put your hope in the feasts and rituals of the old covenant. Put your trust entirely in him to whom all such religious practices pointed: Jesus!

Second, we are also being called to share in the reproach that Jesus endured (v. 13). Today we don’t have a literal “camp” or “city” outside of which we are to go. So the “camp” must represent or symbolize something else for us. I think it points to everything we regard as safe and secure and respectable. To go “outside the camp” is to move beyond the comfort and acceptance that this world offers us. Inside the camp, inside the city gates, is where we find familiarity and ease and affirmation and respect from this world and its value system. To follow Jesus outside the camp is to embrace and bear the shame and reproach he suffered. To join Jesus outside the camp is to willingly identify with him in his suffering and to move out among the lost and unbelieving people of this world. It’s only outside the camp that we will find the unreached people of the world.

And the only thing that makes this a reasonable thing to do is the simple but glorious truth stated in v. 14. There we read that we do this “because” here “we have no lasting city, but we seek the city that is to come” (v. 14). We can joyfully embrace the reproach that Jesus himself endured because we are looking for the city to come, the heavenly Jerusalem that God has prepared for his people who trust him and put their hope in him.

Perhaps the Jews were trying to entice the Hebrew Christians back into the Jewish fold by saying, “We have Jerusalem, but you have no such glorious city!” The author says, “Oh, but we do have a city! Ours is the same city that Abraham and the patriarchs were seeking, that heavenly city that God prepared for them and us” (11:13-16). After 70 A.D. these Jews would no longer be able to claim Jerusalem for themselves.

The religious leaders clung to the city of Jerusalem and cast Jesus from it. They surely did not realize that within a short span of some forty years the city of Jerusalem and the temple they trusted in would be totally destroyed. On the Temple Mount platform there would not be one stone left standing upon another exactly according to Jesus’ words in Matthew 24:2.

This concept of a heavenly city and heavenly reward is something we’ve seen repeatedly in Hebrews. Do you recall in Hebrews 10:34 that Christians are described as having “joyfully accepted the plundering” of their property because they knew they “had a better possession and an abiding one”? They were seeking a city that is to come; a city that has foundations; the eternal and heavenly Jerusalem on the new earth. Knowing this was theirs, they gladly suffered for the sake of aiding and supporting other Christians. It was a permanent possession that could never be taken away from them.

We saw it in Hebrews 11:25-26 where Moses “refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward.” The reward is the heavenly Jerusalem, the place of God’s eternal dwelling with his people on the new earth.

And what is to be our response to this pursuit of Christ into a life with pain and suffering?

15 Through him [Jesus] then let us continually offer up a sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name. 16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.

Verse 15 says it is a life of praise to God — real, heartfelt, verbal praise — the kind that comes out of your mouth as the fruit and overflow of your heart.

In ancient days some Jewish rabbis believed that the time would come when all sacrifices would cease and instead there would be praises. Also, the First Century Jewish writer Philo spoke of a time when the best sacrifice would be the ones glorifying God with hymns. Indeed, in Psalm 50:23 it is written: “The one who offers thanksgiving as his sacrifice glorifies me, to the one who orders his way righty, I will show the salvation of God.”

Scholars feel the “fruit of lips” is taken from Hosea 14:2. In the Hebrew of this verse it reads literally “the young bulls of our lips” (par-im se-fa-te-nu). Praise is indeed like a sacrifice, that costs us something.

When our author refers to this worship as a “sacrifice,” it is an analogy that we’ve seen Paul and Peter use (Romans 12:2; 1 Peter 2:9). Under the New Covenant the sacrifices are no longer physical, but spiritual—the praise of our lips to the God who saved us.

In the words of Warren Wiersbe, “The words of praise from our lips, coming from our heart, are like beautiful frit laid on the altar” (The Wiersbe Bible Commentqry: New Testament, p. 844).

So we are to offer sacrifices…sacrifices of praise. This exhortation can only rightly be exercised “through him,” that is, through Jesus. It is only because of Him and what He has done for us that we have something to praise God for.

It is praise “to God,” certainly not to ourselves. We did absolutely nothing to deserve or gain our salvation. And this praise is to be “continuous,” why? Because of all that God has done for us through Christ. As we noticed in 12:28, worship is always our most natural response to our redemption. Praise, therefore, should be our constant habit. There should hardly be a moment when our lips are not trembling with praise for how kindly and graciously and tenderly and mercifully our God has dealt with us through His Son Jesus Christ.

This praise is further clarified as “the fruit of lips that acknowledge his name,” that is praise that publicly affirms our trust in Jesus Christ, acknowledging Him as our Savior and Lord.

The second response we should have toward our redemption in Christ is to love one another, a theme that began in verse 1, but here it is spelled out in very practical terms.

16 Do not neglect to do good and to share what you have, for such sacrifices are pleasing to God.

These works of “doing good” and “sharing what you have” would likely include the hospitality mentioned in Hebrews 13:2, as well as the ministry to prisoners in Hebrews 13:3. “Doing good” today can include a number of ministries: sharing food with the needy, transporting people to and from church or medical appointments, contributing to needy causes; perhaps just being a helpful neighbor.

Our highest aspiration as those being “conformed” to the image of Jesus, is to live a life that is “pleasing to God.” In my mind, pleasing God goes a step beyond obeying God. We obey the explicit commands or prohibitions of God, while we please God by knowing His heart well enough to know not so much what He demands, but what He desires.

When we go with Jesus to the place of his sacrifice outside the camp, we see more clearly than ever that his sacrifice for us — the sacrifice of himself, once for all for sinners (Hebrews 9:26, 28) — brings to an end all sacrifices except for two kinds: the sacrifice of praise to God (verse 15) and the sacrifice of love to people (verse 16).

Jim Elliot, Pete Fleming, Ed McCully, Nate Saint, and Roger Youderian were killed on January, 1956, in Ecuador, moving toward the need of the Auca Indians and not toward comfort.

Shortly before their deaths on Palm Beach they sang this hymn. Elliot writes, At the close of their prayers the five men sang one of their favorite hymns, “We Rest on Thee,” to the stirring tune of “Finlandia.” Jim and Ed had sung this hymn since college days and knew the verses by heart. On the last verse their voices rang out with deep conviction.

We rest on Thee, our Shield and our Defender,
Thine is the battle, Thine shall be the praise,
When passing through the gates of pearly splendor
Victors, we rest with Thee through endless days.

With that confidence, they went to Jesus outside the camp. They moved toward need, not comfort, and they died. And Jim Elliot’s credo proved true: “He is no fool to give what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose.” “Here we do not have a lasting city, but we are seeking the city which is to come” (Hebrews 13:14).

Stick to Jesus, part 1 (Hebrews 13:9-10)

If you are to go on a wilderness journey, you will need more than a guide or a map and compass. You will need the realization that you are entering into a hazardous world. There are many dangers to be aware of. In the Christian life, teachers are one such danger.

Our author has just expressed how his readers were to regard their former teachers: “Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith” (Heb. 13:7). Those teachers, however, would not always be around, only Jesus remains the same (Heb. 13:8).

The New Testament era, just like ours, was rife with all kinds of heresies infecting the church. Paul warns the Ephesian elders about this in Acts 20:29, “I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock…” We are “he sheep of his pasture” (Psalm 100:3) and need shepherds to guide us. As sheep, we are vulnerable to many dangers. False teachers are like wolves that come in and drag off the sheep into the forest never to be seen again, so our author says, “Do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them” (Heb. 13:9).

The church is always at risk of being “led away” (or “washed away,” as in a river current; cf. Eph. 4:15) by “diverse and strange teachings.” During the apostolic age, some denied Christ’s incarnation (1 John 4:1-3), while others emphasized ascetic self-denial and mystical visions (Col. 2:8, 16-23).
These false teachers not only exist outside the church, but in our very midst as well. Paul warned the elders at Ephesus, “from among your own selves will arise men speaking twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them” (Acts 20:30). The elders, therefore, were to “Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood” (Acts 20:38). False teachers are not only out there; they are also in here. And today, with our access to podcasts and YouTube false teaching can easily enter our inboxes and our homes.

While in the Philippines this past week one of the places we visited was Faith Academy. In their fine arts center the letter “F” on the word “Faith” had broken off and they joked, tongue-in-cheek, about deconstructed faith. Unfortunately that is not a laughing matter, as progressive Christianity has infiltrated many Christian churches.

Michael Kruger (https://rts.edu/resources/what-is-progressive-christianity/) identifies these problems with progressive Christianity: (1) a low view of Christ, emphasizing only that He is a moral example for us to follow; (2) a low view of salvation, focusing on moralism (good works) and being a good person rather than confessing that we are sinners in need of a Savior; (3) downplays our fallenness and sin altogether. Also, they argue that Christ’s death on the cross as a satisfaction of God’s wrath against our sin is “cosmic sadism” and they argue against the reality of hell.

The church throughout the centuries has faced many heresies and today battles liberalism, secularism and postmodernism. These seek to “lead us away” from our purity of devotion to Christ. That is why our author firmly commands us “Do not be led away.”

We do not know exactly what this false teaching was for the Hebrew church. We do know that it was (1) diverse, (2) strange, (3) involved more than one kind of teaching (note the plural), and (4) involved foods and eating. Thus, it was some strange teaching that combined esoteric eating practices with their Christian faith, designed either to make them into Christians or become better Christians.

The ESV Study Bible explains: “The central concern appears to be doctrines about foods (9:10; Rom. 14:17; Col. 2:16-17; 1 Tim. 4:3; cf. 1 Cor. 8:13). The author argues against such doctrines by: (1) juxtaposing them with grace (which truly nourishes the heart); (2) noting that special foods are of no spiritual benefit (cf. 1 Cor. 8:8); and (3) observing that the Christian altar is better than the food of the tabernacle. This may indicate that some Jewish notions (perhaps in a syncretistic mix) are being combated. Unlike most OT offerings, the tabernacle priests could not eat the sin offering from the Day of Atonement, since it was burned outside the camp (Lev. 16:27). However, all Christians partake of the Christian altar (i.e., Jesus’ sacrifice). Some see a reference to the Lord’s Supper here, while others view this as a broader reference to the saving results of the shedding of Jesus’ blood.

One way to recognize false teaching is simply by understanding that it is “strange” (ξέναις). In other words, it lies outside the familiar teachings that had been passed down to them from the apostles (Heb. 2:3-4). Whenever someone comes up with a completely novel interpretation of Scripture that “no one else has ever discovered,” we should treat it like the Bereans did when exposed to Paul’s teaching. Even though Paul was an entrusted apostle, they still kept “examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so” (Acts 17:11b). This reminds us that the way to be able to spot false teachings is to so immerse ourselves in truth so that errors are easily spotted.

Haddon Robinson illustrates this truth in his book Biblical Preaching: “A Chinese boy who wanted to learn about jade went to study with a talented old teacher. This gentle man put a piece of the precious stone into his hand and told him to hold it tight. Then he began to talk of philosophy, men, women, the sun and almost everything under it. After an hour he took back the stone and sent the boy home. The procedure was repeated for several weeks. The boy became frustrated. When would he be told about the jade? He was too polite, however, to question the wisdom of his venerable teacher. Then one day, when the old man put a stone into his hands, the boy cried out instinctively, ‘That’s not jade!'”

A teaching that is “old” might be less appealing than something that is new and shiny. The fundamental reason that we should be wary of “strange” teachings is because Jesus himself never changes. He is “the same yesterday today and forever” (v. 8). If Jesus is the same and doesn’t change, then we should never embrace radical new teachings about Him that lie in opposition to what the Bible, and historical interpretation, teaches.

What the author likely has in view here in this strange teaching about foods is what the whole book has been about from the beginning, which is that certain teachers wanted these Jewish people who had been exposed to Christianity to now go back to the old ways of Judaism, including its laws about food. Is God pleased with you when you eat unclean foods? These teachers were warning them that their diet was damning them and that they needed to go back to Judaism and its food laws.
But it is actually and only through Jesus Christ alone that anyone can become clean and acceptable to God. And while we understand (even more so today) that certain foods are more healthy for us to eat than others, whether we eat red meat or are vegetarians, whether we eat salt or sugar, or use substitutes, those are all for our physical health and have nothing to do with our spiritual condition. Paul says the same in 1 Corinthians 8:8: “Food will not commend us to God. We are no worse off [spiritually] if we do not eat, and no better off [spiritually] if we do.”

So we are being warned here in Hebrews 13 not to elevate issues of diet and nutrition and certain kinds of food and drink to a place where we begin to put our hope in them for our spiritual well-being and acceptance with God rather than in the person and work of Jesus Christ.

The reason that these readers were to avoid being led away by these strange teachings is that
“it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them” (Heb. 13:9). It is possible that the author has in mind “the peace offerings that symbolized communion between the Lord and his people, since the meat of the sacrificed animal was shared by the Lord (blood sprinkled, fat and entrails burned), the priests, and the Israelite worshipers themselves (Lev. 3:1-17; 7:11-16). Such a fellowship meal in the OT sanctuary was rich in symbolism, but, since it conformed to “regulations for the body” (Heb. 9:10) that were temporary and external, it is no longer appropriate for new covenant believers. Now, believers under the New Covenant feed spiritually on Jesus Christ who is our Peace Offering.

It is grace which strengthens the believer’s heart, not subscription to rules and the avoidance of prohibited foods. There is no room now for material sacrifices, animal offerings, sacred meals and hallowed altars. All that is over and gone. Christians have determined to give central importance to one great aspect of their faith: Christ died for them. He was sacrificed for us and shed, not the blood of bulls, but his own blood. Those who stay within the narrow confines of Judaism and serve its tent, or tabernacle, can derive no benefit from the only sacrifice which really matters. (Raymond Brown, The Bible Speaks Today: Hebrews, 257)

Those Old Testament food offerings do not “strengthen” the heart, but rather the grace of God as expressed through the once-for-all, effective offering of Jesus Christ is what strengthens or establishes the heart.

Today, as Paul did long ago, we need to realize that all the food laws and all the sacrificial practices have been fulfilled in Christ (cf. Matt. 15:11; Mk. 7:18-23; Acts 10:15; Col. 2:16-23).

What does now “strengthen” (or “establish”: bebaioō; cf. 2:3; 6:19) the heart is God’s grace, received through faith in Jesus. By God’s grace Jesus tasted death on behalf of every believer (2:9), so that through him we can always draw near to God’s throne of grace to find grace (4:16).

Our author indicates for us how beneficial going to Jesus and His grace will be for us. He says “it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace.” Because it is “good” it should be something that we want, that we desire and pursue after.

A heart “strengthened” is the opposite of one that is “carried about with every wind of doctrine” (Eph. 4:14) or “led away” (Heb. 13:9). There is no legalism in grace; grace is all that God affords us because of what Christ did, not because of anything that we do. Christ’s efficacy is the basis for God’s grace toward us. Thus, salvation is all of God and not of us. Grace assures the believer of eternal salvation. A person who believes this is “strengthened or established by grace.”

Our author emphasizes that there are not two ways to gain spiritual strengthening and life—through Christ and through foods—when he emphasizes, “not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them” (Heb. 13:9).

Instead of going to the temple altar “We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat” (Heb. 9:10). The priests used to eat from the altar, eating certain parts of the animal sacrifices. But our author points to a better altar, a heavenly altar, one “from which those who serve the tent (the priests) have no right to eat.” Even those highly privileged in the Old Testament to eat from the earthly altar are forbidden to eat from this altar because on this altar is Jesus Christ and the only way to partake of Him is by grace through faith. Unbelieving Jews “have no right to eat” of (feed on) Christ, who was sacrificed on that cross altar.

“The old system of the tabernacle accomplishes nothing eternal, nothing spiritual, and nothing that can contribute to our salvation or sanctification. It never has in any permanent way. Christians have an altar completely distinct from the system of animal sacrifices at the tabernacle. Here “altar” is used as an image for the perfect sacrifice of Christ on the cross. Those who exchange the full atonement of the cross of Christ for the temporal, ritual cleansing of animal sacrifices thumb their noses at the Messiah” (Charles R. Swindoll, Swindoll’s Living Insights: Hebrews, 221).

“Christians had none of the visible apparatus which in those days was habitually associated with religion and worship–no sacred buildings, no altars, no sacrificing priest. Their pagan neighbors thought they had no God, and called them atheists; their Jewish neighbors, too, might criticize them for having no visible means of spiritual support” (F. F. Bruce, The New International Commentary on the NT: Hebrews, 379). So our author here wants to encourage his readers that true faith in Jesus Christ, though it has so little visible, external support (Heb. 11) it is nonetheless real and powerful and is our real strength.

For the writer, [our] altar is the cross on which Jesus offered himself as a sacrifice to God. And to the Christian the cross is a symbol that represents the completed work of redemption. As the author of Hebrews repeatedly confirms, Christ offered his sacrifice once for all (9:25, 26, 28; 10:9, 12, 14). The clause we have an altar, then, stands for the cross, which symbolizes the redemption Christ offers his people. (William Hendriksen & Simon J. Kistemaker, NT Commentary: Hebrews, 418)

Grace only goes to the humble, who know they do not deserve it and can never earn it so they instead rest in faith, they “dare not trust the sweetest frame, but wholly lean on Jesus’ name. This is the spiritual law behind Proverbs 3:34, which James 4:6 quotes: “‘God opposes the proud, but gives grace to the humble.’” In our weakness, grace strengthens us.

In every one of Paul’s letters he opens by saying, “Grace be unto you.” And he concludes each of his letters with the same statement that we find in Hebrews 13:25 – “Grace be to you.” In other words, as you open God’s Word and read its contents, “grace” comes to you. Grace is the power of God released into your life through the Scriptures and the Holy Spirit. God wants your “heart” is to be “strengthened” by the power of His grace.

So we feed on Christ instead of the animal sacrifices. “We are allowed to feed on the sacrifice offered up for our sins, and not for our sins only, but for the sins of the whole people of God. And we thus have a far higher privilege in reference to sacred food, not merely than the Israelites, but even than the priests themselves enjoyed. Such seems to me the general meaning of the passage” (John Brown, Geneva Series Commentaries: Hebrews, 697-8).

Jesus told us in John 6:51, “ I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. And the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.”

“God knows that the greatest battle His church faces is purity of doctrine, because that is the basis of everything else. Every bad practice, every bad act, every bad standard of conduct, can be traced [back] to bad belief. The end result of the work of apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers, and of believers becoming unified in the faith and maturing in Christ, is that “we are no longer to be children, tossed here and there by waves, and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, by craftiness in deceitful scheming” (Eph 4:14). A church that is not sound in doctrine is unstable and vulnerable” (John MacArthur Jr., The MacArthur NT Commentary: Hebrews, 436-7)

Posted by Melissa Taylor on FaceBook, 12/4/24

This passage is encouraging believers not to be deceived. The sad reality is that we 21st century Christians are even more easily deceived than the ancients, even though we have the completed Scriptures and two thousand years of solid theological and biblical teaching. But we are gullible and naïve, believing everything that internet tells us. We fail to test this against the Word because we know so little of the Bible or sound doctrine.

If you are faltering and your heart needs to be strengthened, don’t put your trust in any laws or principles or rules or ten steps, but reinforce your faith in Jesus Christ. Go to the Scriptures and allow God’s grace to inflame your heart and inform your mind so that your faith grows.

Jesus has fulfilled the sacrificial system of the old covenant. It does no one any good any longer to trust in those blood offerings or to eat the meat of the sacrificial animals. Most of us are not doing that, but we might be trusting in our religious faithfulness, our baptism, our perfect attendance, our spiritual disciplines. Rather, one must now come to the only altar where full forgiveness and salvation may be found: the cross of Jesus Christ. And when you come to that altar, eat all the grace you can get!

Follow the Leader, part 2 (Hebrews 13:8)

We talked last week about remembering and imitating the faith of our leaders. For the Hebrews, some, maybe most, of those leaders were now gone, likely having been martyred for their faith. The reality is for all of us that our pastors come and go, and some of them fall into sin. We’ve seen that happen far too often among pastors we have respected and loved lately.

Not only will our leaders change, but the religious landscape around us will change. All of us who are older know that our culture has gotten “worse and worse” (2 Tim. 3:13). So Jesus’ unchanging character not only encourages them in the midst of losing good leaders but also admonishes them to stay true to the faith and not follow “diverse and strange teachings” (Heb. 13:9). If Jesus does not change, we should be wary of any new teachings.

“Jesus Christ” was the center of the message that the leaders had preached to these hearers (cf. v. 7). That message and its Hero is what this writer had urged his readers not to abandon. The leaders had preached the Word of God to these readers, and that preaching culminated in Jesus Christ.

All the changes that we face is why it is so important to keep our eyes and trust on Jesus Christ. Everything, and I mean everything else changes. Some of those changes upset us. That is why it is so comforting that “Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever” (Heb. 13:8). So we need most to follow our real Leader, Jesus Christ our Lord.

In the midst of this ever-changing environment, it is good to remember that there is one thing that never changes — and that is Jesus Christ! He was in the past exactly who He is in the present and precisely who He will be forever! That’s why Hebrews 13:8 says, “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, and today, and forever.”

Here, the very same Old Testament Scriptures and wording that describe God the Father’s immutableness are applied directly to Christ (cf. Psalm 102:27 and Hebrews 1:12; Isaiah 48:12 and Revelation 1:17).

The later admonition to “obey your leaders and submit to them” (13:17) may imply that some in the congregation have not transitioned well from the first generation to the present leadership. If any were troubled over the loss of those who once shepherded them, they must realize that their great shepherd is and always will be with them: “Jesus Christ is the same [ho autos] yesterday and today and forever.” The OT citations showing the Son’s divine superiority to angels at the start of this sermon included Psalm 102:25-27, in which the Son is contrasted with the created heavens and earth: “They will perish, but you remain. . . . You are the same [ho autos], and your years will have no end” (Heb. 1:10-12).

The created order’s mutability has touched his hearers’ experience in the death of their shepherds, but the divine Son, Jesus Christ, remains “the same,” unchangeable and eternal. That divine Son has become the incarnate Son, has undergone temptation and suffering and death, and has emerged triumphant “by the power of an indestructible life” (7:16) to become and remain a “priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek” (7:17). If the death of trusted human shepherds has contributed to the hearers’ weariness and faintheartedness, they must realize that they have a “great shepherd” whom God “brought again from the dead” (13:20). He “always lives to make intercession for them” (7:25) and keeps his word, promising, “I will never leave you nor forsake you,” which he expressed in other words to his awestruck disciples after his resurrection: “I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matt. 28:20). (ESV Expository Commentary).

Some of these readers might have experienced Jesus while he was still alive, but for most of them they had no first-hand experience with Christ. But the Jesus seated at the right hand of God is the same Jesus who walked on earth and the same Jesus who will come again for us.

Everything around us changes. We humans change most of all. Our moods sweeten or sour, our ability to work lessens as we age, we age and fall ill and eventually we die. Jesus does not. He always lives and is always the same.

Yesterday Jesus “offered up prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears, to him who was able to save him from death” (5:7). Today he is a high priest before the Father who is able to sympathize with our weakness because “in every respect [he] has been tempted as we are, yet without sin” (4:15). And forever this same Jesus “always lives to make intercession for them” (7:25). “Our priest is eternally the same and eternally contemporary. We need not fear opinion changes or mood swings in Jesus!” (R. Kent Hughes, Preaching the Word: Hebrews, vol. 2, 228).

But what does that mean? What does it mean to say that Jesus is the “same” no matter what time or season it is? This is what theologians call “immutability.” That is, God does not change in His essence (character), His will or His plans or His promises. There is no variableness, no “shadow of turning” (James 1:17) in Christ.

“[Immutability] means that, being perfect, God cannot and does not change. In order to change, a moral being must change in either of two ways. Either he must change for the better or he must change for the worse. God cannot get better, because that would mean that He was less than perfect earlier, in which case He would not have been God. But God cannot get worse either, because in that case He would become imperfect, which He cannot be. God is and must remain perfect in all His attributes” (James Montgomery Boice, Minor Prophets, Volume 2, p. 600).

When we say that Jesus is always and ever the same and that he never changes we aren’t thinking of immutability in the way we apply that term to the Rock of Gibraltar. The Rock of Gibraltar is a very real place off the southwestern tip of Europe on the Iberian Peninsula, was known in myths and history as a solid, stable entity that could not be moved.

John MacArthur has written: “Immutability does not mean that God is static or inert, nor does it mean that He does not act distinctly in time or possess true affections. God is impassible—not in the sense that he is devoid of true feeling or has no affections but in the sense that His emotions are active and deliberate expressions of His holy dispositions, not (as is often the case with human emotions) involuntary passions by which He is driven.”

God is solid and stable, like a rock, and we can depend upon Him in any and every circumstance. But rocks don’t have sense or feelings. Jesus is alive and feels and thinks and responds to circumstances.

Jesus Christ did “become flesh” (John 1:14) but did not cease to be God. God is willing and able to be reconciled to former enemies through the cross (Romans 5:10; 2 Corinthians 5:18-19).
The Greek word for the “same” emphatically states that Jesus Christ is unchangeable! What good news this is in a world where things are changing at lightning speed! Jesus Christ is the one Person we can depend on to be the same, regardless of the time or the spirit of the age. We don’t need to refigure who Jesus is, what He thinks, or what His message is, because He is the same — and everything He represents is the same — yesterday, today, and forever!

The word “yesterday” is the Greek word exthes, and it depicts all time that ever was up until this present moment. It describes the past. The word “today” is the Greek word semeron, and it means today or at this very moment or this current age. It depicts the present. But in the Bible when the words “yesterday and today” are used in one phrase, as they are used here, it also portrays continuity.
The words “yesterday and today” are an Old Testament expression to denote continuity (see Exodus 5:14; 2 Samuel 15:20). So here we find that Jesus isn’t one way in the past and another way in the present. Whoever He was in the past is exactly who He is in the present. There is continuity in Jesus Christ!

Therefore, if you discover Jesus of the past, you have also discovered Jesus of the present, and you have discovered Jesus of the future, because He is continuously the same. The word “forever” in Greek means into all the ages of the future. This phrase depicts all future time to come, including all ages that will ever be known. Hence, it describes the future.

I don’t know about you, but I am so thankful that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and for all future ages! With all the sweeping changes happening in the world right now, I thank God that Jesus isn’t one of them!

Who He was in the past, in the Gospels is the same Jesus who is present with us today and will be with us forever!

There is no “before” or “after” with God, as there is with us. There’s no “He used to be like that, but now He’s like this.” There’s no such thing as “the Old Testament God” as opposed to “the New Testament God.” He was good, He is good, and He always will be good. And the same can be said about His power, His wisdom, His love, and so on.

Another way to talk about God’s immutability is that whereas you and I are always “becoming,” God is always “being.” We’re always traveling; God is already there and has always been. We can develop or deteriorate, grow or decay, progress or regress. But with God, there is no room for improvement. He has always been, and always will be, utterly and delightfully perfect in every way. One theologian puts it like this: “All that is creaturely is in [the] process of becoming. [The creature] is changeable, constantly striving, in search of rest and satisfaction, and finds this rest only in him who is pure being without becoming.”

So when we talk about Jesus never changing, we mean, first of all, that His love towards us does not change. There is no “loves me, loves me not.” Whom He loves, He loves to the end (John 13:1). His love for you doesn’t rise and fall like a thermometer. It doesn’t change toward us because we fail Him, rather His love changes us.

William E. Sangster, a Methodist leader, suggested that if you nail your heart to people, they will move and change, but if you nail your heart to Jesus, as the Bible says, He is, “the same yesterday and today and forever.”

Now, understand that God loves different people in different ways. God “loved the world” (John 3:16) and provides the possibility of salvation. God loves His own children in a different and deeper way. He also loves someone who obeys Him (John 15:14) and who is a cheerful giver (2 Cor. 9:6) in a different way. We could say for those who belong to Jesus Christ God’s love towards us is unconditional, or maybe better said, “contra-conditional.” He loves us even though we are sinners.

The Puritan Thomas Adams takes his love back into the past before the worlds began. He writes:
“Much comfort I must hear leave to your meditation. If God preordained a Savior for man before He had either made man, or man had marred himself—as Paul to Timothy, “He hath saved us according to His own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began” (2 Tim. 1:9)—then surely he meant that nothing would separate us from that eternal love in that Savior (Romans 8:29)” (Thomas Adams, The Immutable Mercy of Jesus Christ).

Secondly, God’s promises do not change. Isaiah 40:8 makes the point: “The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God will stand forever.” He will always be faithful to keep His promises no matter how seemingly impossible it may be. “There is many a believer who forsakes God, but there is never a believer whom God forsakes” says Bob LaForge.

When God’s people departed from Him (in the Old Testament biblical accounts) all the more emphasis was put upon His faithfulness, so that the only hope of His wayward people lay not only in His grace and mercy but also in His faithfulness, which stands in marked contrast with the faithlessness and inconstancy of His people (Gaspar Hodge).

“God is true. His Word of Promise is sure. In all His relations with His people God is faithful. He may be safely relied upon. No one ever yet really trusted Him in vain. We find this precious truth expressed almost everywhere in the Scriptures, for His people need to know that faithfulness is an essential part of the Divine character. This is the basis of our confidence in Him” (A. W. Pink, The Attributes of God). As Spurgeon says, “God writes with a pen that never blots, speaks with a tongue that never slips, acts with a hand that never fails.”

Consider God’s faithfulness to His promises: We learn that all things do work together for good (Rom. 8:28). We learn that God will never leave us nor forsake us (Heb. 13:5). We learn that nothing will separate us from the love of Christ (Rom. 8:35). We learn to walk by faith and not by sight (2 Cor. 5:7). We learn to trust in God’s character and not our circumstances. We learn no detail of our life is outside His loving purpose and sovereign control. We learn His solution far surpasses our most creative imagination. We learn God is often closest when we least feel His presence. We learn Hebrews 10:23 which calls us to “hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful.”

Thirdly, His presence is always with us. To say that Jesus is unchanging and always the same means that there never has been a time in the past and never will be in the days ahead when his assurance to us in the Great Commission will prove false. You will recall that in Matthew 28 Jesus said, “And I will be with you, even to the end of the age.”

So here in v. 8 he tells us that we need never fear that we will wake up one day and God will be gone, vanished, having left us to ourselves. We know this will never be the case because Jesus Christ who is God is the “same” yesterday, when he first made that promise, as well as today when I need him to be near and close by to me, and in the days and weeks and years ahead when my life starts to fall apart.

When we face difficulties, we sometimes forget God’s past faithfulness. We see only the detours and the dangerous path. But look back and you will also see the joy of victory, the challenge of the climb, and the presence of your Traveling Companion who has promised never to leave you nor forsake you.

I’m sure most of you are familiar with the poem Footprints in the Sand.

One night I dreamed I was walking along the beach with
the Lord. Scenes from my life flashed across the sky. In
each, I noticed footprints in the sand. Sometimes there were
two sets of footprints; other times there was only one.
During the low periods of my life I could see only one set of
footprints, so I said, “You promised me, Lord, that you would
walk with me always. Why, when I have needed you most,
have you not been there for me?”
The Lord replied, “The times when you have seen only one set
of footprints, my child, is when I carried you.”

This is the consistent reason, throughout Scripture, why we have no need to fear. After the death of Moses, God encouraged Joshua, the new leader who would lead the children of Israel into the covenanted land, “Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened, and do not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go” (Joshua 1:9).

What a precious promise.

What this means most of all for us and for our author’s first-century readers, is that everything else may change and does change, and only Christ can be depended upon. Our trust in him is therefore a confident trust, for we know that he will not, indeed cannot, change. His purposes are unfailing, his promises unassailable. It is because the God who promised us eternal life is immutable that we may rest assured that nothing, not trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword shall separate us from the love of Christ. It is because Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever that neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, not even powers, height, depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord (Rom. 8:38-39)!

No matter what lies ahead in this always-changing world with its drifting continents and fading suns—no matter what the seas may bring, we must sustain ourselves with this double-focus—remembering those who have gone before and focusing on Jesus Christ, our eternal, unchangeable contemporary. Those who truly do this will navigate the roughest seas.

Follow the Leader, part 1 (Hebrews 13:7)

Today we’re going to look at a verse in Hebrews 13 that has to do with our response to those who lead us in the church. Who has had an impact upon your life spiritually? What men or women have taught you truth that has changed your life? Who are your mentors? More than likely someone has planted seeds in your life that have helped you to become the man or woman you are today. Hebrews 13:7 encourages us to remember them and imitate them.

Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith.

Oh how the church, and even our culture, needs leaders who faithfully speak God’s Word and live in such a way that we want to imitate their faith. Unfortunately, even in this past year we have seen pastor after pastor fall to moral failures.

How we need models. We need men and women that we can pattern our lives after. Men and women of ironclad integrity, strong faith, indomitable courage, sacrificial kindness and genuine humility.
The Bible puts a high emphasis on remembering, usually remembering things about what God has done for us and who He is. But we are also to remember our leaders, those who taught us and modeled the faith for us. We are to regularly call them to mind so that we can imitate their faith. The verb consider actually means to “look at again and again,” to “observe carefully.” (William Hendriksen & Simon J. Kistemaker, NT Commentary: Hebrews, 414)

It’s too easy to forget those who are dead and gone. Our attention span can only focus on so much these days, and the new and spectacular tends to grab our attention. Warren Wiersbe reminds us that “while we do not worship people or give them the glory, it is certainly right to honor them for their faithful work.”

Unlike the Lord, who is ever with us (Heb. 13:5-6), human leaders, just like the Old Testament priests are “prevented by death from continuing in office” (Heb. 7:23). Therefore, in addition to “remembering” those presently suffering imprisonment and abuse (13:3), the hearers must also “remember” their congregation’s original leaders, who no longer serve among them.

It is important to have guides and mentors from the past. Maybe for you these are people who have long since passed from this life, people like John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, Charles Simeon or even more recently J. I. Packer or Eugene Peterson. I would encourage you, if you cannot think of someone who has impacted your life significantly, to turn to some of these mentors from the past and learn from them.

In fact, I would encourage you to read Christian biographies. There are some compilations which feature several key Christians, like John Woodbridge’s Sketches of Faith: An Introduction to Characters from Christian History, Eric Metaxas’ Seven Men and the Secret of Their Greatness and Seven Women and the Secret of Their Greatness, and James and Marti Hefleys’ By Their Blood: Christian Martyrs of the 20th Century and Tim Chester’s Bitesize Biographies. All of John Piper’s compilations of men from the past which he calls The Swans are not Silent, seven books each covering three biographical sermons about men from the past are excellent.

Then there are individual biographies as well. I would recommend John Bunyan’s Grace Abounding, Hudson Taylor’s Spiritual Secret, Iain Murray’s Amy Carmichael. There are several biographies of C. S. Lewis, Charles Spurgeon, Martin Luther and John Newton that are excellent as well. All of these will encourage your faith. Tim Challies has a long list of Christian biographies on his website: https://www.challies.com/book-recommendations/biographies/

Now, the key concepts here are remembering and imitating. One of the dangers we have in our society is what is widely known as the “celebrity culture” in which pastors are often put upon pedestals and almost treated as gods. This is unhealthy. It is fine to remember them and imitate their lives, but don’t worship them.

R. Kent Hughes reminds us how this passage fits in this context. He says…

“Significantly, this is beautifully consistent with the purpose of chapter 13, which is to strengthen the little Hebrew church so it will ride out the coming storms of persecution. A church that adequately recalls its godly leaders and considers the outcome of their way of life and attempts to imitate that way of life will sail well! Remembering, considering, and imitating the virtues of departed believers is of greatest spiritual importance both to one’s family and to the broader family of the Body of Christ. Doing so will certainly help keep the boat afloat” (R. Kent Hughes, Hebrews, An Anchor for the Soul, volume 2, p. 227).

Our author points out two specific characteristics of these men. They had taught them the Word and they lived out their faith. In other words, they preached the Word, then they practiced what they preached (Ezra 7:10). First, these are men “who spoke to you the word of God.” When you recall how few copies of Scripture these first century churches possessed, you can see how highly dependent they were upon teachers of the Word. This teaching the Word is a vital part of our mentoring and discipling of others today, that we engage with them over the Scriptures. We open the Scriptures and seek to interpret its meaning just like Ezra and Nehemiah did. “They read from the book, from the Law of God, clearly, and they gave the sense, so that the people understood the reading” (Neh. 8:8).

Likely this author wanted his readers to become so proficient with the Scriptures that, like the Bereans, they could “examin[e] the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so” (Acts 17:11).

Relationships that impact us deeply are relationships that are built upon the truth of God’s Word. Oh, we can have relationships with people outside the faith. In fact, we should. But our spiritual lives are nourished by being around people of the Book. We need the Word of God to guide us, especially today with its emphasis on feelings.

In Paul’s final imprisonment he wrote the Pastoral Epistles. Over and over again in those three letters to Timothy and Titus Paul emphasized the importance of sound doctrine and instructing people in that sound doctrine.

Paul gives instructions for many ministries of the church, but the one he emphasizes most is the ministry of preaching and teaching the Word of God. He exhorts Timothy to “devote [himself] to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation [preaching], to teaching” (1 Tim. 4:13). The ministry of the Word is critical to faith. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. Moreover, sitting under the Word strengthens the faith of God’s people. In 2 Timothy, Paul exhorts his younger colleague to “preach the Word . . . in season and out of season . . . for the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions” (2 Tim. 4:2-3).

Paul told Timothy, “and what you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses entrust to faithful men, who will be able to teach others also” (2 Tim. 2:2). We are to teach the Word so that it is passed on from generation to generation.

But we are not only to listen to these men teach, we are also to watch their lives, the way that they live and (likely) the way that they died. This is so that we can imitate them. They say that more is caught than taught, meaning that the way you live preaches more powerfully than the words of your mouth.

Remember that Jesus chose twelve men “so that they might be with him and he might send them out to preach” (Mark 4:13). These men learned by watching Jesus. It was not just what He taught that was vitally important, it was the way he interacted with people, cared for people, and lived His life before the Father. They saw him pray and then asked, “Teach us to pray” (Luke 11:1). It was this very reality that these men had been “with Jesus” that was so obvious to the religious leaders after Pentecost. In Acts 4:13, as Peter and John are preaching before the Sanhedrin, their conclusion was “Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated, common men, they were astonished. And they recognized that they had been with Jesus.”

Life on life is so very important. Those who disciple, don’t just depend upon some written curriculum and believe that once you have finished that you have discipled someone. They need to see how you live. That was the genius of Dawson Trotman, the founder of the Navigators. He would invite sailors into his home to see how he and Lila and his children lived together. They need to see your “way of life.”

Now, it is quite possible that our author is speaking of leaders who are no longer with them. In the past they “spoke to you the word of God,” and hearers must now recollect the “outcome of their way of life.” That “outcome” (ekbasis) was their exit from life on this earth, the completion of their pilgrimage. Whether their deaths were due to natural or accidental causes or to martyrdom, our author does not say. Although the hearers of Hebrews themselves had not yet shed blood (12:4), some of their leaders may have done so.

Scholars agree that the author here is referring to past leaders who have already died. In 13:17 & 24, he refers to current leaders. But in 13:7, they are told to consider (Greek = “to look at again and again”) the result or outcome of these past leaders’ way of life, implying that they successfully finished their course. While some of them had been martyred, it is not specifically the actual death which they were to consider and imitate, but rather the “sum total” or “achievement” of their day-to-day behavior, manifested in a whole life. Yes, they had finished their race well.

This, of course, is what our author had earlier encouraged all of them to do, to run the race so as to win. Back in Hebrews 12 he encouraged them:

1 Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, 2 looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God.

Elsewhere in the NT, congregational leaders are called “elders” or “overseers” (Acts 20:17-35; Phil. 1:1; 1 Tim. 3:1-7; Titus 1:5-9; 1 Pet. 5:2-3). Teaching and spiritual shepherding are the ministries of such elders/overseers. The original leaders of the people reading this letter “spoke . . . the word of God,” and their successors were “keeping watch over your souls” (Heb. 13:7, 17). The first generation’s integrity and conduct were no doubt exemplary, but our author spotlights their faith as that which must be imitated (reinforcing the point of 10:26-12:3).

Now, reading this passage in its context, we realize that the dilemma these readers were facing, in addition to losing some of their leaders, there was the possibility of being “carried away by varied and strange teachings” (13:9), including returning to Judaism. So he calls them to remember the godly teachers who had spoken the word of God to them (13:7). Even though these men had now died, Jesus Christ, whom they preached, is the same yesterday, today, and forever (13:8). His grace (13:9) and His sacrificial death on the cross (13:10-12) are at the center of sound doctrine.

Jesus and His death on the cross have become our altar, which supersedes and replaces the Jewish altar in the temple. Therefore, we must turn our backs on Judaism or any other religion and hold firmly to Christ and the cross (13:13). If such faith leads to hardship, rejection, persecution, or even death, keep in mind that we are not living for rewards in this life, but for the reward He has promised us in heaven (13:14).

The fact that our heroes do sometimes fall and every leader eventually dies is what makes verse 8 so powerful. “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.” The reality is, even for those of us preachers and leaders who are still here, we need to point our people to Jesus. Their focus must be on Him, not us.

Warren Wiersbe relates how after announcing his resignation from a church that he had been pastoring for several years, one of the members said to him, “I don’t see how I’m going to make it without you! I depend so much on you for my spiritual help!”

His reply shocked her. He said, “Then the sooner I leave, the sooner you can start depending on the Lord. Never build your life on any servant of God. Build your life on Jesus Christ. He never changes.”

So, keep pointing to Jesus. Give him all the glory. Don’t steal the glory from God.

But all of us, as leaders, should want to finish well. Seeing men that we have known and respected crash and burn through moral failures makes this all the more urgent. We should want to be like Paul, neither coasting into the final years of our lives, nor crashing and burning, but finishing well.
Paul said at the end of his two letters to Timothy (2 Timothy 4:7-8)…

“I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing.”

Paul fought, Paul finished, Paul kept the faith. Finishing well means that we deal with our sins decisively, killing sin and confessing it when we commit sin. It also means treasuring God, beholding Christ, and being filled with the Spirit — finding all our satisfaction in Him.

It made me think of Robertson McQuilkin, who served as president of Columbia International University for 22 years, died in 2016. He wrote these words before he died:

It’s sundown, Lord … I fear not death, for that grim foe betrays himself at last, thrusting me forever into life: life with you, unsoiled and free.

But I do fear … That I should end before I finish or finish, but not well. That I should stain your honor, shame your name, grieve your loving heart. Few, they tell me, finish well. . . Lord, let me get home before dark.

McQuilkin feared “the darkness of a spirit grown mean and small, fruit shriveled on the vine, bitter to the taste of my companions … the darkness of tattered gifts, rust-locked, half-spent, or ill-spent, a life that once was used of God now set aside.” He longed for fruit “lush and sweet, a joy to all who taste.” He wanted to burn brighter at the end.

“Of your grace, Father, I humbly ask. . . Let me get home before dark,” he prayed. And to that we say, “Amen.”

When we use the phrase, “finishing well,” we mean following Christ to the very end of our lives, finishing his assignments for us and hearing his “well done, good and faithful servant.” That should be our highest desire, our greatest goal in life.

Ultimately, the only thing that can keep is in the race and help us to finish well is to drink deeply of God’s grace constantly. Grace is also how we start the race. Grace is what keeps us in the race. And grace is what takes us to the end. As John Newton put it in his famous hymn, “Tis grace hath brought me safe thus far, and grace will lead me home.”

When all is said and done, grace is the ultimate explanation for why any of us make it. We are kept by the grace of God. It is then very appropriate to pray, “Lord, give me the grace to finish well.”
Jerry Bridges identifies four practices that can help us finish well. He says…

There may be other issues that are important, but I believe these four are fundamental. They are:
 daily time of focused personal communion with God
 daily appropriation of the gospel
 daily commitment to God as a living sacrifice
 firm belief in the sovereignty and the love of God
https://www.desiringgod.org/messages/four-essentials-to-finishing-well

So if you are a leader, set your nose to the grindstone and pursue those practices that will help you to finish well. The church depends upon it. Future generations of Christians depend upon it. Teach the Word well, but also live a life that is worth imitating.

If you are a Christian, look for leaders whose life you can imitate. If you cannot find one that is near you, get on the phone or go visit them. If you cannot find anyone that is alive, find a mentor among the biographies I mentioned earlier.

For the Hebrews, it was their regular recollection of the victorious witness of those persons who had first led them to Christ by faith, of their joyful living for the glory of God, and of their untroubled dying in the assured hope of resurrection, that would put away from them all thoughts of giving up their own struggle. It would encourage them to “keep on keeping on.”

And I hope it will do the same for you today.

Two of Our Most Dangerous Idols, part 3 (Hebrews 13:4-6)

Last week we looked at a second idol that is so dangerous to our Christian race, the temptation to believe that money and possessions will fill the holes in our souls and bring us ultimate joy and satisfaction. The reality is that only God can do that. Our text is Hebrews 13:5-6:

5 Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” 6 So we can confidently say, “The Lord is my helper; I will not fear; what can man do to me?”

Instead of coveting more, we need to learn to be content with what we have, with what God has given us.

Steve Cole illustrates the reality that contentment is an attitude of the heart independent of circumstances in this way:

A Jewish man in Hungary went to his rabbi and complained, “Life is unbearable. There are nine of us living in one room. What can I do?” The rabbi answered, “Take your goat into the room with you.” The man was incredulous, but the rabbi insisted, “Do as I say and come back in a week.”

A week later the man returned looking more distraught than before. “We can’t stand it,” he told the rabbi. “The goat is filthy.” The rabbi said, “Go home and let the goat out, and come back in a week.” A week later the man returned, radiant, exclaiming, “Life is beautiful. We enjoy every minute of it now that there’s no goat—only the nine of us.” (Reader’s Digest [12/81].) Contentment is more a matter of our perspective than of our circumstances, isn’t it!

But even among God’s people, true contentment is not common. The Puritan Jeremiah Burroughs captured this fact by titling his book, The Rare Jewel of Christian Contentment. The philosopher, Immanuel Kant, saw this when he observed, “Give a man everything he wants, and at that moment, everything will not be everything” (cited by Richard Swenson, Margin [NavPress], p. 190).
Contentment never comes from having more, contentment comes from trusting in the God who can provide all that we need. When we have God, we have all we need.

What is to be the standard of contentment as to food and clothing? The Apostle furnishes us with it in the words before us: “Be content with present things.” Indeed, if we do not make this the standard of contentment, we will never be content at all (John Brown, Geneva Series Commentaries: Hebrews, 682). We are to be content with the things we already possess, that God has already given to us. In fact, one of the best ways to overcome our greed is to be grateful for what we already have. Another is to be generous with what we have.

For you see, not only does contentment focus upon what I presently have, not what I feel like I “need”; contentment also focuses upon eternity. Joni Eareckson Tada says it like this:
For me, true contentment on earth means asking less of this life because more is coming in the next. Godly contentment is great gain. Heavenly gain. Because God has created the appetites in your heart, it stands to reason that He must be the consummation of that hunger. Yes, heaven will galvanize your heart if you focus your faith not on a place of glittery mansions, but on a Person, Jesus, who makes heaven a home” (Heaven: Your Real Home, p. 126)

The reality was, some of these people our author is addressing had had property seized, had been put in prison, had all their worldly possessions taken away from them. Certainly that could be a reason for them to abandon their faith. But the writer here encourages them to keep their eyes on their Lord.

A boatload of discontented materialists—lovers of money—will not do well in the coming storms. Those who always want more and more will turn away from God when their Christianity brings material subtraction rather than addition. On the other hand, those who are content—who have found their ultimate treasure in the unflagging presence and care of God—these will sail on!

And that gets us to the reason our author gives for pursuing contentment in life, “for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” What a wonderful, amazing promise!

The Greek text is very emphatic that this is a promise directly from God to you, for literally “He himself said ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.” No one else has said it on God’s behalf. This isn’t someone claiming to speak for God. God himself, and it is quite emphatic, is the one who makes this promise and assurance to us. And he doesn’t merely say it once. Again, more literally, “he said it and it still stands.” Or, the ever-lingering and always applicable effect of what he said is that he will never leave us.

“Greed not only flows from the lie that God is not enough for us in the present, but the fear that he will not adequately provide for our future. Greed not only wants to hoard, acquire, and possess more today, but it also fears that God will not meet our sense of need and be enough for us tomorrow. Hebrews 13:5 not only teaches us that the opposite of the ‘love of money’ is being ‘content with what you have,’ but it also takes God’s stunning promise of provision to Joshua (Josh. 1:5) and gives it to every Christian: ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.’ Far better than having some seemingly endless, but finite reserve of possessions is having the infinite God himself and his truly endless energy and resourcefulness to supply our every need, and to lavish his grace on us ‘far more abundantly than all that we ask or think’ (Eph. 3:20)” (David Mathis, Kill Joys: The Seven Deadly Sins)

In other words, “Christians, be content because you have God—and he will never forsake you!” “be content with what you have, for he has said, ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.’”
Where in the Old Testament did God say he would never leave us or forsake us? Only occasionally explicitly, but everywhere implicitly! God told Jacob as he fled from Esau to Bethel, “I am with you. . . . I will not leave you” (Gen. 28:15). Moses encouraged the Israelites, “Be strong and courageous. Do not fear or be in dread of them, for it is the LORD your God who goes with you. He will not leave you or forsake you” (Deut. 31:6, cf. vv. 7, 8). When Joshua was called to take over Moses’ leadership, God said, “I will be with you. I will not leave you or forsake you” (Josh. 1:5). David instructed Solomon, “Do not be afraid and do not be dismayed, for the LORD God, even my God, is with you” (1 Chron. 28:20). David expressed the preciousness of God’s presence when he said, “Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me.” “To the people of Israel as a whole God said: “When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; and through the rivers, they shall not overwhelm you” (Isa. 43:2). To the church Jesus said: “And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matt. 28:20).

There is no more precious promise than God’s presence with us. In Psalm 73 Asaph initially becomes envious of the wicked who had so much—not only material possessions, but health and comfort and influence over others. It bothered him greatly, until he went to worship and there his perspective turned more towards God, towards spiritual realities and towards eternity. Then he realized that all that they had on earth would perish with them, but he would be received into glory (Psa. 73:24). His conclusion then are some of my favorite verses in Scripture:

“Whom have I in heaven but you? And there is nothing on earth that I desire besides you. My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever.” (Psa. 73:25-26)

Asaph was enabled to revive in his estimation the value of God’s presence over having all the advantages of this life. You see, idols cannot be just rooted out of one’s life by willpower, it has to be replaced. As Thomas Chalmers called this the “expulsive power of a new affection.” You get rid of the old affections by replacing them with new, and greater, affections.

Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones illustrates it this way: “The way the dead leaves of winter are removed from some trees is not that people go around plucking them off; no, it is the new life, the shoot that comes and pushes off the dead in order to make room for itself. In the same way the Christian gets rid of all such things as bitterness and wrath and anger and clamour and evil speaking and all malice. The new qualities develop and the others simply have no room; they are pushed out and they are pushed off.”

Charles Spurgeon reminds us, “You that are familiar with the Greek text know that there are five negatives here. We cannot manage five negatives in English, but the Greeks find them not too large a handful. Here the negatives have a fivefold force. It is as though it said, ‘I will not, not leave thee; I will never, no never, forsake thee.’” How wonderful is that? He uses a double negative which might be rendered this way: “I will not, no, by no means will I ever abandon you. And if that doesn’t register with your soul, let me say it again: I will not, no, by no means ever will I forsake you.” Wow!

You would think saying it once would be enough. But God knows how prone we are to doubt. He knows how inclined we are to question whether or not he’s really that committed to us. He knows that our experience in this world is one where we are often abandoned by people closest to us. People make promises. They make vows. They declare their undying and unwavering commitment and promise that no matter what happens they will always be there for us. No matter how bad it gets, whether there be financial disaster or physical disability or some devastating loss, they tell us that we can count on them. They won’t let us down.

God knows that all of us, at some time or other, and in the case of many of you several times, have experienced the devastation that comes when that person on whom you thought you could always depend failed to show up or decided not to stick with you. Or if they did show up, they told you they were backing out of a relationship or a marriage or now refuse to fulfill a promise or pay a debt.
God says:

“I know how hard it is for you to believe anyone when they promise they’ll always be present with you. I know how deep the pain is in your heart. I know that your instinct is never to trust anyone ever again. I know that you’ve put up defenses in your heart lest you suffer that unimaginably painful rejection yet again. I know that you think you yourself can only rely on you yourself. But I’m telling you that, as God, as the only totally truthful being in the universe, I will always be there when you need me. You may not feel my presence. You may feel all alone, but you aren’t. I’m there. I’m watching and loving and caring and guiding you through even the worst of circumstances. So don’t be afraid. Don’t make stupid or sinful decisions based on your past experience with unreliable people. Trust me. I will never, ever, by no means ever leave you or forsake you or abandon you. There isn’t much you can rely on in this life. The stock market looks stable, but one day it will crash. Your house feels sturdy and strong, but a tornado may leave it in a pile of rubble. Your husband/wife gives every indication that they meant what they said when they exchanged wedding vows with you, but there’s no guarantee they won’t fall in love with someone else. Your best friend has repeatedly told you, ‘If you’re ever in a bind, call me.’ But I’m the only one you can ultimately and unconditionally and with complete confidence know will keep his word to you.”

And here’s the most important point. God will be there when money cannot be. You can’t trust money to be there like you can trust God to be there.

Again, “This is the reason why we must not be covetous. There is no room to be covetous, no excuse for being covetous, for God hath said, ‘I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.’ We ought to be content. If we are not content, we are acting insanely, seeing the Lord has said, ‘I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.’”

The material things in life can decay or be stolen, but God will “never leave us or forsake us.” He will not leave us even for a little while. He may seem to hide his face, but he will not leave us.

The soul that on Jesus hath lean’d for repose,
I will not, I will not, desert to his foes;
That soul, though all hell should endeavour to shake,
I’ll never, no never, no never forsake.
Rippon’s Hymns, 1787

What a wonderful promise. God promises he will “never leave us or forsake us.” People may forsake us, turning their backs on us and we can no longer count on them as friends. Even married people can become enemies and divorce. And people, through no fault of anyone, may move away and leave us. But God does neither. He will not forsake us, no matter how much we mistreat Him. And He will never leave us, He is always present, right at our side, or as Tozer says, “God is as near to you as your own breath, as near to you as your blood, as near to you as your nerves, as near to you as your thoughts and your soul.”

And here’s the amazing truth. God will always be there for us precisely because one day on a cruel cross at Calvary, God abandoned His own Son. Yes, God did forsake his only-begotten Son. He abandoned him on the cross. He gave him over to torture and death. He turned His back on His beloved Son. Jesus cried out from the cross those plaintive words of Psalm 22, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”

Of all the people on earth that God should have kept this promise to, it was Jesus, His perfect Son. But out of eternal love and grace and mercy He had determined to forsake His Son on the cross so that you and I might be accepted, eternally and fully and completely accepted.

Jesus was forsaken and abandoned as the punishment and judgment you and I deserved, precisely in order that we would never have to undergo such an experience. We will never be forsaken by God precisely because Jesus was forsaken in our place. Whatever abandonment you and I deserved, abandonment to eternal torment, he suffered. The separation from God that he endured, we should have, but now never will.

Therefore, if someone had pushed back against God’s promise here in v. 5 and said, “How do I know you will never leave me or forsake me,” God would reply by pointing to the cross of Christ. “There,” he says to us, “right there in the God-forsakenness of my Son and your substitute is the assurance that you will never undergo what he did. All the reasons why I might leave you or forsake you have been poured out on Jesus.”

Based upon this strong, amazing promise (v. 5), we can speak to ourselves with confidence (θαρροῦντας), reminding ourselves that “The Lord is my helper.” Our mind-set must be crowned with matchless confidence: “So we can confidently say, ‘The Lord is my helper; I will not fear; what can man do to me?’” (v. 6). The Apostle Paul addressed this same issue in slightly different terms in Romans 8. He asked: “If God is for us, who can be against us”? (Rom. 8:31). And he backed this statement up with another look at the cross for proof: “He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?” (Rom. 8:32).

When our minds are fearful at what man can do to us, this is the promise we must remember.
This is the mind-set that will ride out the storm no matter what happens to us—just as Chrysostom did when he was brought before the Roman emperor and was threatened with banishment:

“Thou canst not banish me for this world is my father’s house.” “But I will slay thee,” said the Emperor. “Nay, thou canst not,” said the noble champion of the faith, “for my life is hid with Christ in God.” “I will take away thy treasures.” “Nay, but thou canst not for my treasure is in heaven and my heart is there.” “But I will drive thee away from man and thou shalt have no friend left.” “Nay, thou canst not, for I have a friend in heaven from whom thou canst not separate me. I defy thee; for there is nothing that thou canst do to hurt me.”

Our author quotes from Psalm 118:6 (LXX 117:6): “The Lord is my helper [boēthos]; I will not fear; what can man do to me?” The ancient psalmist, surrounded by enemies, confidently defeated them “in the name of the LORD” (Psalm 118:10-13). Hebrews has shown the length to which the Lord went to be our “helper,” undergoing suffering and temptation in order to “help” (boētheō) us in temptation (2:14-18) and to grant us access to the throne of grace, where we find “grace to help [boētheia] in time of need” (4:16).

This quotation from Psalm 118:6 points to the truth that real contentment comes only when we trust in God to meet our needs and to be our security. There will always be the temptation to believe that our security comes from our bank accounts and pension plans, from insurance and retirement accounts. But our help comes from God.

Psalm 118 us a Messianic Psalm, meaning that it is fulfilled in Jesus Christ. As Warren Wiersbe says, “It was a source of great peace to the early Christian to know that they were safe from the fear of man, for no man could do anything to them apart from God’s will, Men might take their goods, but God would meet their needs” (The Wiersbe Bible Commentary: New Testament, p. 843).

A woman once said to evangelist D. L. Moody, “I have found a promise that helps me when I am afraid. It is Psalm 56:3—‘What time I am afraid, I will trust in thee.’” Mr. Moody replied, “I have a better promise than that! Isaiah 12:2—‘I will trust and not be afraid.’” Both promises are true and each has its own application to life circumstances. The important thing is that we know Jesus Christ as our Lord and Helper, and that we not put our trust in material things.

Our last two statements about God “never leaving or forsaking” and God is “my helper,” show us that theology—what we believe about God—is vitally relevant and practical for our daily lives. We are all theologians. We all believe something about God. Unfortunately, that something is not always accurate nor adequate.

To think accurately about God is to think about him exactly as the Scriptures have presented Him to us. Throughout history, even the Israelites of all people, worshipped gods other than the true God. God had warned them to “have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3), but throughout history until their return from Babylon, the Jewish people had a tendency to adopt the gods of the surrounding nations and worship them. That ruined their lives.

Late in the history of the Northern Kingdom, before they were taken into captivity in 722 B.C. by the Assyrians, Hosea warned, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…” (Hos. 4:6). In particular, they didn’t know their God and they disregarded His laws.

It is vital that we think accurately about God today. We have the advantage of the whole Bible and two thousand years of study and reflection upon the Word of God. We have commentaries and theological works to help us understand and worship the true God. There is no excuse for us. Yet today we still worship idols—idols of sexual pleasure and material accumulation. We mistakenly believe that they will “save” us from lives of disappointment, boredom, meaninglessness, powerlessness, victimhood, aloneness. Every addiction is our attempt to fill the holes in our souls through idols.

It is also vital that we think adequately about God today. What do I mean by that? Why is that important? We think accurately about God when we understand that He is holy—completely unique and totally set apart from sin. But we think adequately about God when it our hearts grasp that He is “holy, holy, holy,” holy to the highest extreme. It is important to know that God is merciful, but even more important that we know that He is “rich in mercy.”

So knowing God is vitally important and it is practically relevant to our lives today. Because God is always with us and promises to help us, we don’t have to fall into the trap of trusting in money to be our savior, we can trust in the only One who truly can deliver us.

Two of Our Most Dangerous Idols, part 2 (Hebrews 13:4-6)

Over the course of the last few weeks we’ve been looking at several imperatives that start off Hebrews 13, commands on how to live the Christian life: “Let brotherly love continue,” “do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers,” “remember those who are in prison,” then last week “let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled.”  Today we come to the last of the imperatives and the second of which identifies two of our most dangerous idols that we pursue for the sake of happiness—sexual fulfillment and a multiplicity of possessions.

Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” So we can confidently say, “The Lord is my helper; I will not fear; what can man do to me?”

I’m fairly confident in saying that regardless of the century in which a person lives, sex and money will always be at the top of the list when it comes to our greatest battles and the temptations we encounter.  Today we want to look at the temptation to greed and covetousness.

Decades ago Friedrich Nieztzsche wrote that with the absence of God in our culture, money would take His place.  Money would become our idol.

“What induces one man to use false weights, another to set his house on fire after having insured it for more than its value, a third to take part in counterfeiting, while three-fourths of our upper classes indulge in legalized fraud…what gives rise to all this? It is not real want, — for their existence is by no means precarious…but they are urged on day and night by a terrible impatience at seeing their wealth pile up so slowly, and by an equally terrible longing and love for these heaps of gold…What was once done “for the love of God” is now done for the love of money, i.e. for the love of that which at present affords us the highest feeling of power and a good conscience.”

But so few of us really think that we are greedy!  The other guy, sure, but not me. In fact, covetousness and greed are often admired in our culture.  It is part and parcel of ambition.  

The Bible also calls this covetousness and it is the last of the prohibitions in the Ten Commandments (Exod. 20:17) and the one that Paul says tripped him up (Rom. 7:7-8). John Owen has said that “covetousness is an inordinate desire to enjoy more money than we have, or than God is pleased to give us.”

Yet, love of money is a huge pitfall in the Christian life.  So here in Hebrews 13:4-6 our author links together these two prevalent idols in our culture—the desire for sexual fulfillment and the desire for more and more.

The sins of sexual impurity and covetousness are linked in several NT passages (e.g., 1 Cor 5:10-11; Eph 4:19; 1 Thes 4:3-6), probably because their prohibitions are given side by side as the seventh and eighth of the Ten Commandments.  Both the sexually immoral and those greedy for money pursue a myopic self-gratification that takes them outside the bounds of God’s provision.  Such greed amounts to accusing God of incompetence as a provider of one’s most basic needs and, therefore, is incompatible with commitment to God himself (cf. Mt 6:24).  Consequently, Christians are exhorted to keep their lives “free from the love of money” and to “be content” with what they have.  (George H. Guthrie, The NIV Application Commentary: Hebrews, 437)

The pagan culture at the time, and our modern, especially New York culture today; puts those two things (money and sex) in opposition.  For us today, sex is just a means to an end.  It is not a holy, sacred thing.  So you do it with whomever.  But, money is very, very sacred and so you don’t share it with anybody.  But you see, Christians are the opposite.  Because in Christianity, sex is seen as a holy thing in itself.  Something that you don’t share with anybody but your spouse.  But money is not big a deal.  You share it with whomever. (Tim Keller; Money and Your Faith)

Covetousness, either of another man’s wife, or someone else’s property, is a perilous snare.  The Christian believes that in his providential goodness the Lord will give him what is good for him.  He will work hard, be generous with his possessions, and leave the rest with God.  He certainly does not spend his precious time fretting about how he can collect more money, or acquire more valuable things.  This is the way the godless behave.  The believer is grateful for those material necessities he already possesses and rejoices in far more satisfying spiritual possessions.  His heart is set on those riches, not on the perishable things which have no value beyond death.  Covetousness is born of doubt; contentment is the child of faith.  (Raymond Brown, The Bible Speaks Today:  Hebrews, 254)

So our author tells us, “Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have…”  We are to be content with “what we have.”  Although these are two separate statements, they are saying the same thing.  Not to be in love with money is contentment.  And if you are able to live in contentment with what you have, it means you are free from the love of money. 

To grumble about our circumstances is to challenge the love and goodness of our heavenly Father.  To be discontented implies that He has not provided us with what we need. Discontent was the sin of Israel in the wilderness.  God had just miraculously delivered them from slavery in Egypt and He was miraculously meeting their needs, yet they grumbled and complained about their hardships and even threatened to return to Egypt.

Notice first of all in our passage that it is not money that is the problem, but the “love of money,” the desire to have more and more of it, to make our wants our needs.  It is not sinful to have money, and some people God has blessed with greater wealth.  I believe that God gives people wealth when He knows He can trust them with it—that it will not become an idol and will be used to glorify God and bless others.  So money itself is not the problem.  Rather, loving money is.

And it is not only the rich who face this temptation.  Even poor people can be obsessed with getting money.  1 Timothy 6:9-10 expresses this danger that we all face:

But those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. 10 For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs.

Money and possessions can be a snare that plunges us to ruin and destruction.  It is a craving that can cause us to doubt God and ruin our spiritual life.

Men who trap animals in Africa for zoos in America say that one of the hardest animals to catch is the ringtailed monkey.  For the Zulus of that continent, however, it’s simple.  They’ve been catching this agile little animal with ease for years.  The method the Zulus use is based on knowledge of the animal.  Their trap is nothing more than a melon growing on a vine.  The seeds of this melon are a favorite of the monkey.  Knowing this, the Zulus simply cut a hole in the melon, just large enough for the monkey to insert his hand to reach the seeds inside.  The monkey will stick his hand in, grab as many seeds as he can, then start to withdraw it.  This he cannot do.  His fist is now larger than the hole.  The monkey will pull and tug, screech and fight the melon for hours.  But he can’t get free of the trap unless he gives up the seeds, which he refuses to do.  Meanwhile, the Zulus sneak up and nab him.

The author of Hebrews does not want us to fall into the trap of being so greedy for more that we imperil our spiritual lives.

Again, it is “the love of money” that is so harmful.  And as such it is “a root of all kinds of evils.”  Materialistic cravings and greed are a great evil because they show dependence on money rather than on Christ.  Materialism is the antithesis of chapters 11-12, where a life pursuing heavenly rather than earthly rewards is extolled.  Materialism also demonstrates that someone cares more about items they can see than about spiritual promises that they cannot presently see.  (Bruce Barton, Life Application Bible Commentary: Hebrews, 233)

So terrible is this sin and so great is its power that, one who is governed by it will trample upon the claims of justice, as Ahab did in seizing the vineyard of Naboth (1 Kings 21); he will disregard the call of charity, as David did in taking the wife of Uriah (2 Sam. 11); he will stoop to the most fearful lies, as did Ananias and Sapphira; he will defy the express commandment of God, as Achan did; he will sell Christ, as Judas did.  This is the mother sin, for “the love of money is the root of all evil.”  (Arthur W. Pink, An Exposition of Hebrews, 1140)

Yet, most of us truly believe that if we had “just a little bit more” we would be happy.  Instead of being content, we long for more; we believe that we need more.  But the Scriptures say that this attitude will ruin us.

Leo Tolstoy once wrote a story about a successful peasant farmer who was not satisfied with his lot. He wanted more of everything.  One day he received a novel offer.  For 1000 rubles, he could buy all the land he could walk around in a day.  The only catch in the deal was that he had to be back at his starting point by sundown.  Early the next morning he started out walking at a fast pace.  By midday he was very tired, but he kept going, covering more and more ground.  Well into the afternoon he realized that his greed had taken him far from the starting point.  He quickened his pace and as the sun began to sink low in the sky, he began to run, knowing that if he did not make it back by sundown the opportunity to become an even bigger landholder would be lost.  As the sun began to sink below the horizon he came within sight of the finish line.  Gasping for breath, his heart pounding, he called upon every bit of strength left in his body and staggered across the line just before the sun disappeared.  He immediately collapsed, blood streaming from his mouth.  In a few minutes he was dead.  Afterwards, his servants dug a grave.  It was not much over six feet long and three feet wide. 

The title of Tolstoy’s story was: How Much Land Does a Man Need?  How much money is enough money?  For John D. Rockefeller the answer was “just a little bit more.” At the peak of his wealth, Rockefeller had a net worth of about 1% of the entire US economy. He owned 90% of all the oil & gas industry of his time.  Compared to today’s rich guys, Rockefeller makes Bill Gates and Warren Buffett look like paupers.  And yet he still wanted “just a little bit more.”

Forbes Magazine, February 19, 2024 issue reported: “For millennials, however, make that 480% more.  In a 2023 study by financial services company Empower, millennials reported needing to earn $525,000 a year to be happy.”

The author of Ecclesiastes informs us, “He who loves money will not be satisfied with money, nor he who loves wealth with his income” (Ecclesiastes 5:10).  Our hearts resonate with the wisdom of these ancient words. C. H. Spurgeon amplifies this thought:

It is not possible to satisfy the greedy.  If God gave them one whole world to themselves they would cry for another; and if it were possible for them to possess heaven as they now are, they would feel themselves in hell, because others were in heaven too, for their greed is such that they must have everything or else they have nothing.

Jesus also warned us that, “the deceitfulness of riches and the desires for other things enter in and choke the word” (Mark 4:19).  Our spiritual growth is likely to be stunted by the desire for and the ownership of many possessions.

The sin is not in having more, the sin is being discontent with what God has given us.  The sin is not in having wealth, the sin is in what you do with it.  It’s not the amount, it’s the attitude… It’s not about what you have, it’s about how you feel about what you have.

The very first temptation in the history of mankind was the temptation to be discontent…that is exactly what discontent(ment) is – a questioning of the goodness of God.

The Scriptures tells us that desire for wealth is a danger. After Jesus’ encounter with the rich young man, Mark tells us:

And Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How difficult it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!”  And the disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said to them again, “Children, how difficult it is to enter the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.”  And they were exceedingly astonished, and said to him, “Then who can be saved?”  Jesus looked at them and said, “With man it is impossible, but not with God.  For all things are possible with God.” (Mark 10:23–27)

Jesus’ point was that it is impossible for a man who trusts in riches to get into Heaven, because a rich man trusts in himself!  However, by the grace of God it is still possible.  God’s grace can change hearts. At the end of the Sermon on the Mount Jesus recommended:

Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. (Matthew 6:19–21)

So again, our author tells us, “Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have…”  Choose contentment with what you have, over covetousness for what you don’t have.  Don’t let your possessions possess you.  “The avaricious man is never content: ungenerous and grasping, he always wants more and is always afraid of losing what he has” (Philip Edgecombe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, p. 567)

An insatiable appetite to acquire possessions is a form of idolatry (Eph. 5:5; Col. 3:5), since it relies on created things to provide the satisfaction and security found only in the Creator (Rom. 1:25; cf. Jer. 2:11-13).  It’s idolatry because the contentment that the heart should be getting from God, it starts to get from something else.  The Lord Jesus warned against covetousness: “One’s life does not consist in the abundance of his possessions” (Luke 12:15).

Paul talks about contentment in Philippians 4 as a “secret” that needs to be “learned.”  In other words, it doesn’t occur to us naturally.  Naturally, from infancy we learn to strive for more.  We cry out for more nourishment as babies, we fight for one more toy as infants,

10 I rejoiced in the Lord greatly that now at length you have revived your concern for me. You were indeed concerned for me, but you had no opportunity. 11 Not that I am speaking of being in need, for I have learned in whatever situation I am to be content. 12 I know how to be brought low, and I know how to abound. In any and every circumstance, I have learned the secret of facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need. 13 I can do all things through him who strengthens me.

Paul goes on to promise these potential givers, something that he and all of us need to remember, that “my God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus” (Phil. 4:19).

So Paul learned to be content no matter what his external circumstances were, whether “facing plenty and hunger, abundance and need” and then reflected on the reality that this was not due to his own strength, but “through him who strengthens me,” through his personal relationship with Jesus Christ, in total dependence upon Him.

What is contentment?  It is an attitude of satisfaction with your present circumstances.  It doesn’t depend upon the circumstances.  Those circumstances could be good or bad.  Contentment is “a result of faith in God’s provision and is a supernatural gift that can be found in any situation” (John Piper).

“The contented person experiences the sufficiency of God’s provision for his needs and the sufficiency of God’s grace for his circumstances. He believes God will indeed meet all his material needs and that He will work in all his circumstances for his good “(The Practice of Godliness, NavPress, 1996, p. 85).  That is a contented person.

Don’t misunderstand what Paul is saying.  This is not laziness or fatalism or yielding passively to whatever comes our way.  This is not resignation.  That’s not what contentment is.  Rather it is a detachment from anxious concern by having learned to live immune from the poison of circumstances. It doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t try to improve our lot in life, nor does it mean that we shouldn’t enjoy the material blessings God has given us.  It simply means that whether we have a lot of stuff or nothing at all, our confidence in God and our joy in life are unchanged!  We don’t transfer our trust from God to money, but continue to trust in God and enjoy Him no matter how much of this world’s “stuff” we have or don’t have.

John Ortberg concludes:

We keep thinking that a train called more will get us to a station called satisfaction.

What if trying to pursue satisfaction by having more is like trying to run after the horizon?  Why would we ever expect more to be enough here if this is not our home?

What if the train is called contentment?  What if the station is called heaven?

What if the station is real and is to be the object of our truest and deepest longings?  Then we will see God face-to-face.  Then our longings for glory, beauty, love, and meaning will be fully realized.  Then the restless human race will finally cry out, “Enough!”

And God will say, “More!”  (John Ortberg, When the Game is Over It All Goes Back in the Box, 200)

Two of Our Most Dangerous Idols, part 1 (Hebrews 13:4-6)

Idols, throughout the Bible they were made of stone, metal or wood or nature itself—sun, moon, rain, etc.–, but they were all used in an effort to bring some sort of blessings upon the one who sacrificed to the idol.  But on a deeper level, and one which is still in operation today, is that idolatry is “anything that we come to rely on for some blessing, or help, or guidance in the place of a wholehearted reliance on the true and living God” (John Piper)

If we come to crave, love, depend upon, and trust for a blessing people’s praise to enhance our self-exaltation, or money, or power, or sex, or family, or productivity, or anything else besides God himself for the greatest blessing, help, guidance, and satisfaction, then in essence we are doing what idolatry has always done.  Thus, the Apostle John concludes his first epistle with this clarion call, “Little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21).

If verses 1-3 were looking at how we look out for others in love, here in vv. 4-6 we are encouraged to look out for ourselves.  We must guard our own hearts in order to pursue genuine love for God and true holiness.  So our author chooses to focus in on what are likely the two most common idols that human beings struggle with: sex and money.

Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous. Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” So we can confidently say, “The Lord is my helper; I will not fear; what can man do to me?”

These directives summon Christians to seek satisfaction of their physical needs and desires through submitting to God’s will and trusting in God’s presence. Sex and money are perennial human issues, and with both the author orients our hearts toward God, who designed our sexual drives to be fulfilled in marriage and who jealously woos our anxious hearts away from an adulterous affair with silver. In doing so, God makes good his promise never to leave us (a promise that silver cannot keep: Prov. 23:4-5; Luke 12:16-21).

He starts with sex: “Let marriage be held in honor among all…”

Marriage was under attack in the first century, either through asceticism or libertinism.  Ascetics considered “virginity as necessary to Christian perfection” (Philip Edgcumbe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977), p. 556).  This later developed in the second century into the Montanist movement, which later spawned celibate monasticism. To such, those who choose marriage choose inferior spirituality. 

We know that this was an issue even within the New Testament era because Paul in 1 Corinthians 7 addresses some in the church at Corinth who believed that sexual relations in marriage were spiritually defiling and that husbands and wives, though married, should refrain from all sexual contact with each other.  Paul sternly rebukes them for this.  Then again in 1 Timothy 4 Paul issues this warning:

“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons, through the insincerity of liars whose consciences are seared, who forbid marriage and require abstinence from foods that God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth. For everything created by God is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, for it is made holy by the word of God and prayer” (1 Timothy 4:1-5)

But the greatest assault on marriage’s honor came from the libertines who saw marriage as irrelevant as they pursued unbridled sexual fulfillment.  In fact, it was very common for Roman men to have a wife to sire his children and a number of women on the side, including slaves, to fulfill his sexual desires.  There was no expectation in that society that men would be sexually faithful to their wives. 

So Christians were already distinctive in the way they viewed sex and marriage.  The second-century Christian writer Tertullian, for example, said, “One in mind and soul, we do not hesitate to share our earthly goods with one another.  All things are common among us but our wives (Apologetics, p. 39, italics are mine)

Wouldn’t you agree that marriage is under attack in our world today?  People no longer honor marriage like we used to.  Instead, people ridicule it, argue against it, make fun of it, and hide from it.  Divorce, adultery, cohabitation, homosexuality and transgenderism all dishonor the biblical idea of marriage.  Today radical secular wisdom claims that marriage impedes self-actualization—an unforgivable sin in the eyes of modern men and women.  We live in the wake of the “free sex” movement of the 1960s which allows any and every sexual expression.

So our author addresses both groups.  To the one he says: “Marriage is good.  Marriage is not to be forbidden or avoided.  Hold marriage in high regard.  Honor it as the divine gift from our heavenly Father.”  To the other group he says: “And when you get married, be faithful to your spouse.  Don’t defile your marriage covenant or the marriage bed by committing sexual immorality or adultery.”

So what is marriage?  What does the Bible say?  Well, first of all, marriage is God’s good idea.  We find it in Genesis 2.  Genesis proclaims, after God gave Eve to Adam, “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24).   This is God’s instruction.  It is God’s good idea.

Ray Ortlund reminds us: “What every married couple needs to know is that their marriage is a remnant of Eden. This is why every marriage is worth working at, worth fighting for. A marriage filled with hope in God is nothing less than an afterglow of the garden of Eden, radiant with hope until perfection is finally restored.”

Sam Storms gives this definition of marriage: I would define marriage as the enjoyment of spiritual and physical unity between one man and one woman based on a life-long, covenant commitment, the ultimate aim of which is to display the covenant relationship between Jesus Christ and his Bride, the Church.

Marriage, from the beginning, was between one man and one woman and it was to be a permanent, heterosexual relationship.  As Jesus later said, “What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate” (Matthew 19:6).

There are no other acceptable alternatives in the Bible.  God’s clear and unmistakable revealed will is that marriage is a life-long covenant between one man and one woman that illustrates or displays the covenant love between Christ and his Church.  Same-sex marriage does not exist as far as the Bible is concerned.  It is not what God calls “marriage.”

Our author says that marriage should be “held in honor.”  “Held in honor” reflects the adjective timios (Acts 5:34), which can often mean “precious” in the sense of having great value, such as “precious stones” (1 Kings 10:2, 10-11; 1 Cor. 3:12).  Our author focuses, therefore, on the priceless gem of sexual intimacy, to be protected by the covenant of exclusive fidelity between one man and one woman. 

Charles Swindoll notices that our author places the adjective “honored” at the front of the sentence in a position of emphasis.  In contrast to the triad of asceticism, immorality, and indifference, Christian marriage should be honored.  (Charles R. Swindoll, Swindoll’s Living Insights: Hebrews, 215)

Our author here in Hebrews is telling us that marriage is not simply an institution or arrangement or even merely a covenant.  It is not to be looked at as a negative thing, an imprisonment.  Rather, it is something of immeasurable value: it is precious in the sight of God and we must treat it accordingly.  Treasure it.  Respect it.  Esteem it.  Prize it.  And therefore protect it.

Honoring marriage is so vitally important partly because it is a picture of something bigger and greater and more mysterious.  The Holy Spirit honors it in Ephesians 5 by using it to portray the relationship between Christ and his church (Ephesians 5:23–32).  So if you dishonor marriage, you dishonor God’s picture of redemptive love.  That’s a big deal!

John Piper writes:

What this implies is that when God engaged to create man and woman and to ordain the union of marriage, he didn’t roll the dice or draw straws or flip a coin as to how they might be related to each other.  He patterned marriage very purposefully after the relationship between his Son and the church, which he had planned from all eternity…Those of us who are married need to ponder again and again how mysterious and wonderful it is that God grants us in marriage the privilege to image forth stupendous divine realities infinitely bigger and greater than ourselves. (https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/the-mystery-of-marriage).

Two sins seem to be represented here, “sexual immorality” and “adultery.”  The difference, basically, is whether one is married or not.  Sexual immorality, from the Greek πόρνους, from which we get our word pornography, stands for any kind of sex outside of marriage.  This would include premarital sex, pornography, masturbation, polyamory and homosexuality.  It is the broad sweeping term.  In contrast, adultery (μοιχοὺς), can only be committed by a married person who is being unfaithful to their marriage vows and engaging in sex with someone other than their spouse.

F. F. Bruce confirms:  “Fornication and adultery are not synonymous in the New Testament: adultery implies unfaithfulness by either party to the marriage vow, while the word translated ‘fornication’ covers a wide range of sexual irregularities.”

Unfortunately, sexual immorality and adultery are not confined to unbelievers in the world around us.  Far too many pastors, not to mention other Christians, have fallen into sexual sins lately.  That’s why this counsel from our author is so needed today!

Christopher Ash provides six reasons to take adultery very seriously in his book Marriage for God.  First, adultery is turning away from a promise made to the person we married.  At the wedding we turned towards them and made promises, but adultery is turning away from them and breaking those promises. 

Second, adultery leads the adulterer from security to chaos.  Because the adulterer has turned away, he or she enters into a life of torn loyalties.  “Once the promise is broken, the barrier is breached, the secure wall of marriage is torn down, all hell breaks loose.  And an adulterer finds he or she has not after all exchanged one secure place (his marriage) for another secure place (the new home with the new partner).  That is the illusion, but the reality is much different.

Third, adultery is secretive and dishonest.  Adultery is inherently secretive, inherently dishonest.  It has to be because no one wants to trumpet that they are breaking a promise.  Adultery loves the darkness and flees the light and for as long as it can it tries to remain a secret.  “Whereas news of a marriage is broadcast by joyful announcement and invitations, news of adultery leaks out by rumor and under pressure.”  Ouch.  That alone should tell us what is at the heart of adultery, for sin loves to remain in the darkness while righteousness loves the light.

Fourth, adultery destroys the adulterer.  Adultery does no favors to the adulterer.  To the contrary, it undermines and erodes character and integrity.  “Like all secret sin, it eats away like some noxious chemical at the integrity of the one who commits it.  The moment any of us drive a wedge between what we say we are publicly and what we actually are privately, we injure ourselves at the deepest possible level.”

Fifth, adultery damages society.  We can widen the scope from the individual to the society around him and see that the damage continues there, too.  Adultery does harm to the very fabric of society.  “Each act of adultery is like a wrecker’s ball taking a swing at the secure walls of the social fabric of society. It stirs up hatred and enmity.  It encourages a culture which reckons marriage boundaries needn’t really be quite so rigid.”  We love to think our sins are our own, that they concern only us.  But no, our sin goes far beyond ourselves and impacts others, tragically so.

And that leads us to the sixth serious consequence of adultery, adultery hurts children. Adultery does grievous harm to an innocent party—children.  “Because children are right in the thick of it, in the intimacy of the family home broken by cheating on promises, darkened by secrecy and lies, riven with conflict and hatreds.”  Children thrive when there is structure, when there is stability, when there is peace and order.  Children are harmed when adultery brings chaos and conflict and disunity.  Children are innocent parties who are terribly harmed when adultery separates their parents.

But there is an even greater consequence that our text forewarns: God’s judgment.  The reason marriage should “be held in honor among all” “the marriage bed be undefiled” is because “God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.”

God’s judgment will follow the sexually impure (cf. 12:29).  Under the Old Covenant the Israelites were to punish fornicators and adulterers, but under the New Covenant, God Himselfhas promised to do it. 

“It is because of immorality and impurity, says Paul, that ‘the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience’ (Eph. 5:5f; cf. Rom. 1:26ff.), cutting them off from the divine blessing, as our author has warned by citing the example of Esau (12:16f.).  Similarly, again, Paul admonishes the members of the Thessalonian church: ‘This is the will of God, your sanctification, that you abstain from sexual immorality…because the Lord is an avenger of all these things, as we solemnly forewarned you.  For God has not called us for uncleanness, but in holiness’ (1 Thess. 4:4-7)” (Philip Edgecombe Hughes, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews, pp. 566-567).

Proverbs tells us “Can a man carry fire next to his chest and his clothes not be burned? Or can one walk on hot coals and his feet not be scorched?  So is he who goes in to his neighbor’s wife; none who touches her will go unpunished” (Proverbs 6:27-29) and “He who commits adultery lacks sense; he who does it destroys himself” (Proverbs 6:32).

“How does God judge fornicators and adulterers?  Sometimes they are judged in their own bodies (Rom. 1:24-27) as God “gives them over” to their idolatrous desires.  Certainly they will be judged at the final judgment (Rev. 21:8; 22:15).  Believers who commit these sins certainly may be forgiven, but they will lose rewards in heaven (Eph. 5:5ff).  David was forgiven, but he suffered the consequences of his adultery for years to come; and he suffered in the hardest way: through his own children” (Warren Wiersbe, The Wiersbe Bible Commentary: New Testament, p. 842).

When our author is saying, “Let marriage be held in honor among all…” he is not saying that marriage IS held in honor by all, but is exhorting all of them to hold marriage in high honor.  As Christians we should celebrate biblical marriage, we should celebrate anniversaries.  Holding marriage in honor also means that we reject any marriage that does not follow the biblical example.  We don’t have to be ugly about it, but we don’t honor marriage as God presented it by countenancing any other type of marriage pattern.  Marriage is God’s good gift.  He ordained it and defines it.

Indispensable, of course, to the honor of marriage is purity, and thus the text adds, “and let the marriage bed be undefiled” (v. 4b).  “Bed” is used here as a euphemism for sexual intercourse, and in demanding that it be kept “undefiled” “our author is referring in sacrificial terms to married chastity” (Hugh Montefiore, A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1964), p. 240).  The marriage “bed” is an altar, so to speak where a pure offering of a couple’s lives is made to each other and to God.

The Bible celebrates sex between one man and one woman united in marriage, such as we see in that book that was off-limits to young Jewish men, the Song of Solomon.  There we see passionate sex which God applauds between a man and woman who were now married.  Before that, he says three times, “Do not arouse or awaken love until it pleases,” or, as paraphrased by Eugene Peterson in The Message, “Don’t excite love, don’t stir it up, until the time is ripe — and you’re ready.”  And that time is within the boundaries of a marriage between one man and one woman.  Marriage, as an ordinance and gift from God, is neither defiling nor to be defiled.

Sex between a man and woman who have committed themselves to one another through marriage is precious and sacred and life-giving.  Paul says in 1 Corinthians 7:6-7 that sexual desire is not, in itself, sin.  However, if someone has those desires, the answer is to get married.  Marriage is the place to legitimately satisfy our sexual desires.

This was radical stuff in the pagan context—and Christians lived it out.  When Pliny was sent by the Roman Emperor Trajan to govern the province of Bithynia and looked for charges against the Christians, he had to report back that on the Lord’s Day, “They bound themselves by oath, not for any criminal end, but to avoid theft or adultery, never to break their word. . . .” (William Barclay, The Letter to the Hebrews (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1957), p. 221).  Christian sexual morality was unique in the pagan world and a source of wonder. 

Today it is more a subject of ridicule.  And it has become increasingly so today in a world that considers adultery irrelevant, purity abnormal, and sex a “right” (however and with whomever one may get it) and that has invented the egregious term “recreational sex.”

Sex is not just for reproduction, nor is it merely for pleasure, although both of those are good results.  Sex is primarily to build together a one-flesh intimacy, a deepening knowledge and appreciation of one another as we meet one another’s sexual needs.

Talk-show host Dennis Prager wrote about an ad he read for a sex therapist in Los Angeles: “If you’re not completely satisfied with your sex life, give us a call.”  The more he thought about it, the more he was struck by the brilliance on the ad, all because of two words: “completely satisfied.”  Who is ever completely satisfied with anything?

Imagine these ads:

If you’re not completely satisfied with your spouse, give us a call.

If you’re not completely satisfied with your body, give us a call.

If you’re not completely satisfied with your church, give us a call.

We are completely satisfied with nothing.

Why are we completely satisfied by nothing on earth?  Maybe it’s because we are too demanding.  Maybe the answer is to bank our desires, settle for what life gives, and try to keep ourselves from wanting.

Or maybe it’s because we were made for something earth does not have to offer and we’re playing life’s game in a way it wasn’t designed to be played.  (John Ortberg, When the Game is Over It All Goes Back in the Box, 193).  Maybe we were made for something greater, something more satisfying.  As C. S. Lewis said in his wonderful book Mere Christianity, ““If I find in myself desires which nothing in this world can satisfy, the only logical explanation is that I was made for another world.”  We were made to find our deepest desires and needs met in God Himself, not in anything He has created, even our spouses.

Can sex become an idol?  Sure it can!

So John Piper reminds us…

It is astonishing that in this Psalm (51), David never prays directly about sex.  His corruption all started with sex, leading to deceit, leading to murder…or did it?   I don’t think so.  Why isn’t he crying out for sexual restraint?  Why isn’t he praying for men to hold him accountable?   Why isn’t he praying for protected eyes and lust-free thoughts?  The reason is that David knows that sexual sin is a symptom, not the disease.  People give way to sexual sin because they don’t have fullness of joy and gladness in Jesus.  Their spirits are not steadfast and firm and established.  They waver.  They are enticed, and they give way because God does not have the proper place in their feelings and thoughts. (John Piper, Shaped By God, 37)